DomKen
Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004 From: Chicago, IL Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen What do you think he means by 'looking into certain areas' that means subpoenas and hearings. Why is he requesting an expanded budget for his committees legal staff if not for endless hearings and subpoenas? Let's just cut all the horse crap right here and now. I'm not "final" on this thought, but I've been deliberating this about a day. I think a lot of investigations and subpoenas may be a good thing, and entirely appropriate, and may even be political advantageous, depending on how the House goes about doing it. So I don't accept your unstated premise that it will be somehow wrong for the House to do so. Live by the subpoena, die by the subpoena. What does Obama and the Democrats have to hide, that you are afraid that the disinfectant of light will reveal? Firm Do you not remember 1995 through 2000? I don't care about legitimate oversight and don't care about the occasional hearing or round of subpoenas. What I, and I think most Americans, don't want is another utterly pointless waste of money and effort over something akin to whitewater. Previous chair's of the Government Oversight commitee have made do with 40 staff attorneys and investigators (including Democratic chairmen overseeing Republican Presidents) so why does Issa need to double the staff?
|