FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slvemike4u There you go once again repudiating a basic tenet of the tea party "express" .The "throw the bums" out impulse.Voters are fickle...and effective governing needs to take a longer view.Let's look at how a state like California is doing....here we have gonernment by popular decree...everything open to the whims and fancy of the electorate ie:referrendums....resulting in chaos and ineffectual governing.Policy can not be crafted by popular vote....not as long as those voting look solely to their own wants,needs and various special interests. You are correct this upcoming congress will not be able to overturn the health care reforms recently passed....though they will kick up a shitstorm in trying to do so....thereby pandering to the shortsighted fears of their core constituency...the idea of being forced to pay for the health care of others.Why that is shortsighted is that we have been paying for the health care of others all along.....and overpaying in fact.Healthcare reform is now like a rock rolling downhill...soon,as you said to become another "third rail" in American politics.....and that is a good thing. Now you go ahead and chew up everything I have said...I need to put some baby back ribs on the grill....and take the long view with them...cook'em slow and easy. Be back in a few....lol. mike, I'm not going to chew up everything you have said. It's pretty good, as far as it goes. It just doesn't go far enough. The problem is that you are accusing "the other side" of being short sighted and fearful, but that accusation is no less valid for "your side" of the debate. In the long run, "your side's" agenda is unsustainable, or at the least trades one group of problems for another. So, assuming that "health care reform" stays in place, and many people get care who otherwise wouldn't. Great! But it comes at a cost. You are shifting the burden from one group of people, to another group, and you are likely "spreading the misery", rather than eliminating it. And not only when it comes to health care, but at a larger societal cost. It comes at the cost of reducing the freedoms and property rights within the society as a whole, for the benefit of a smaller portion of the society. This is the way that most democratic nations have been going on the last couple of centuries. It remains to be seen if that trade-off is sustainable to such a society as a whole. TANSTAAFL, after all. Firm
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|