ServiceNTucson
Posts: 127
Joined: 4/3/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FLsubmalecd Very interesting thread. As a sub, if my Mistress wanted me to tie her up, spank her or do anything that would otherwise seem like something done to a sub, I'd be glad to do it for her and not even think of it as anythign but giving her what she wants. I mean if sh ordered me to flog her, I would just knowing I'm doing what she has directed, ordered or otherwise wanted me to do FOR her. Not to her. It stll would be her that is in charge and would be respected as my Domme. It's more of a mind set as to who is in charge so to speak. Not the act itself I'm not saying I'd enjoy any of those things. But if it made her happy and leased her, that is what would be important to me. now all I have to do is find her. sigh.......... For the most part, I would agree with this. My only disagreement (speaking only for myself, YMMV) is with the second to last sentence "I'm not saying I'd enjoy any of those things." I would enjoy it, because I enjoy topping. But, I enjoy topping because I enjoy serving. This does not, by any means, make me dominant. When I top I like the same thing I like when submitting, doing what she likes, what gives her pleasure. I see no contradiction whatsoever to a slave topping his Owner for her pleasure. She's still the one in charge. Everything is still done according to her desires and her limits. Does deriving pleasure from topping occasionally make a submissive unsubmissive? I don't think so. Does deriving pleasure from bottoming make a dominant undomly? I don't think so either. It takes a lot of trust to bottom, particularly for a woman to bottom to a man. If my owner (if I had one) told me to top her, I would not take it as a sign that she's undomly or unworthy of owning me. I'd take it as a sign that she trusts me.
_____________________________
Harry "I find television very educating. Every time somebody turns on the set, I go into the other room and read a book." Groucho Marx www.desertdominion.org
|