EbonyFtshGoddess
Posts: 446
Joined: 1/1/2006 From: Hollywood Hills, CA Status: offline
|
juliaoceania quote:
I think that the difference is that there are so few dommes compared to sub men and sometimes these men pay a lot of tribute for what ends up to be nothing. I am not saying that is what you do, I do not know you. I think that the difference I can see is that from what I have read here the "tribute" is often unasked for. don't worry, i'm not taking it personally, but on the other thread.. women that freely admit we don't demand tribute still got our tits nailed to a board. or people were saying that we demand it, but aren't upfront about it. i've run across a lot of profiles here from fulltime pro dommes that are clear about what they want. i'm clear about what i expect.. if someone can't serve me in the lifestyle capacity i want, but still they may want a heavy gummi klinik or rubber intensive therapy scene with me will compensate me for my time. and i've had 4 tributed sessions- 3 of which i collared after about our 3rd session and the tributing stopped because they were then owned. i spend money on my slaves but i know by FAR male doms are expected (sorta) to take care of their slaves.. personally, i contribute to the upkeep of any top i've ever had. the slaves that tribute because they know they can't live up to my expectations but still wnat to experience a scene with me, my personal slaves give up WAY more valuable things than fuckin money.. such as.. their free will. that's their *tribute*.. allowing me complete control and micromanagement of their lives.. the other slaves that want a taste or *glimpse* tribute me with rubber or i have been tributed cash for some of the tributed scenes i've given. that's their contribution because they realize they can't contribute lifestyle acquiescence. i'm not in the habit of training people just so we can *play*.. any training is to mold them into the better submissive/slave for me. a pro client realizes he can't submit to my ideals. i do see your point tho. i entirely agree how the women that demand gifts or money then run off is wrong. who would agree it's right? but when the women on the other thread said we accept sincere gifts or contribution to our toys/playspace/rubber/gear etc were suddenly whores. darq quote:
EFG, its a lot about attitude. Over and over again in the other thread female dominants have commented that they're taking tributes now as a way to make the submissive prove himself. i wholeheartedly agree and i stated before on the other thread, there are many ways for a submissive to prove himself without cash tribute. i suggested how i field through my potential applicants. they weed themselves out when they aren't willing to handwrite a letter of intent to serve and mail it to me. i feel if someone can't take the time to mail a letter then he surely couldn't submit to my whim. i know some that do demand financial tribute as a way to prove sincerity.. even though i disagree with that practice i will say this- i've never had a male tribute me randomly on his own (without me demanding it) ever turn out not to be sincere. like someone else said on the other thread- people are reluctant to part with their money. all of the males that use cash as a gift upfront without me saying it. many will send money with their handwritten letter of intent.. i'm not asking or demanding they mail Euros with their letter, they do it all on their own.. or they'll mail rubber stockings with the letter.. or a flogger or my favourite flowers. i don't demand it, but dammit if i'll send a nice matching set of equally weighted, chrome handle rubber floggers back to them just to *prove* i'm not trying to cheapen things. only a couple (literally like 2 or maybe 3) of the mistresses said they demand tribute upfront for lifestyle slaves. but i do distinctly recall women being flamed for saying they do not mind nor turn down heartfelt gifts.. but i'm glad another mistress suggested this thread. i do have dominant male tops that i will engage in SM play with as a bottom and i have no problem buying us gas masks or pussy/clit pumps etc that we both enjoy during play. i feel if a top is taking time with me, i can contribute to toys or gear that make both of our experiences more enjoyable.. i just saw a wide variety of women being lumped under one umbrella and attacked like the rest just because we admit (and freely). yeah.. hook us up with some toys.. i won't turn it down.. but nearly all of the women there also said they don't demand toys yet we won't turn them down. but then we got replies pretty much saying that if we want toys we should get them ourselves. in my heart i do sense a bit of misogyny.. at the same time.. i've always seen both sides of the fence. i know i expect different things from a male wishing to just *scene* with me, rather than someone willing to actually being *owned* by me. ok. i'll back out and read now.. i was just curious why this thread wasn't as heated as the other one.. and why the male masters weren't being flamed like the female tops are/were. back to lurking on this one..
< Message edited by EbonyFtshGoddess -- 4/29/2006 9:12:01 AM >
_____________________________
One Man's Phobia is Another Man's Fetish
|