Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Hanky Spanky


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Hanky Spanky Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 3:43:09 AM   
CaringandReal


Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

In years past, some people were afraid to admit that they were anything but hard-core, 24/7, TPE, Uber-Master & no-limits slave, etc., because they would receive flack from the "One True Way" types that looked down their noses at anyone who presented themselves as bedroom-kinky only.

I think this site has done a lot to open minds and promote acceptance of all types, so the kinksters are coming out into the daylight.

Also, some people get online and type a lot of fantasy. Just because you're reading about someone's house and barn full of slaves doesn't mean they actually exist. Online, you can be anybody you want.





(amused)

Not that it's the least bit important anymore, but in my "years past" which I am guessing wildy were a few years before your "years past" people were afraid to admit online that they were in master/slave relationships becuase if they did they would recieve flack from all the top/bottom casual players promoting their endless play parties, dungeon fuckfests, hedonstic screwing of casual acquaintances or total strangers. In fact, terms like TPE were invented precisely because "master" and "slave" were so misunderstood, hated, and feared by the popular bdsm sceners at that time. It was an attempt, I now believe a misguided attempt, to soften the impact of that reality, to make it easier for others to acknowledge this way of doing kink as legitimate enough not to earn a burning at the stake.

There really was a time, not that long ago, when anybody who spoke of wanting a deeper relationship or of having more than casual play or the occasional "bonding of equals who happen to like kink" was deeply derided and attacked, told they were mentally ill and at the same totally arrogant and pushing that life onto others, and frequently threatened with being outed and reported to the police, by people who wanted them to just shut up so that they could get on with convincing newcomers to the Scene that the epitomy of their lives would be reached when said newbie was whipped by them. You see, many a succulent piece of "fresh meat" was beginning to prick up its ears at all the tpe controversies, and wonder, "You mean there could be more to this than reporting to the world in explicit detail how I was single-tailed to a shred last weekend by the great master whipper, John Q. Scenester who then dumped me for a a chick he wanted to fuck more later that night? There is a psychological element to all of this? There might even be.. gasp... love? Or devotion? Or even someone who would want to control me outside of a short, shallow sexual scene that left me wanting so much more?" And when a few of the formerly master/slaves-now-TPEists stuck to their guns and responded with, "Yes. This is the way I happen to live, it's the way that makes me personally most happy and fulfilled, and you could have this too, if you want it badly enough" they were labeled elitist scum (aka "One True Wayists") as a way of discrediting and dismissing their discussion of their individual routes to happiness...and also pulling all the hot chicks away from the play parties. Certain monsterous ideologes, who shall go unnamed as it pleases me to observe their slowly drying flesh in the halls of the forgotten, seriously could not be happy unless everybody nodded and kowtowed to the great Scene Event in the Sky. Switches were the true royalty in those days. Twice as much kink experience as anybody else! ;)

The point of the above moldy history lesson is this: when it comes to controversy over sexual lifestyle choices within the bdsm umbrella, the wheel turns, the kalidscopic picture seems to change, but the patterns are still basically the same and they always repeat. Backlash against one form of opression generates, in its turn, those who backlash against the backlashers. (Ah, backlashing! I haven't had a good back lashing in such a long time--but I digress.) The people who talk about these things with such high dudgeon remind me of those families in which abuse is perpretrated. Parent beats kid. Kid grows up and beats his own kids. etc. Aside from getting totally off this mentally dysfunctional wheel, the only thing we can try to do is try to control our personal desires to repeat idiotic and utterly wasteful pattern of hatred and acrimony toward those wo do not act or believe as we do. Think of the wonderous things one could purchase with the hoard of emotional energy saved by not getting all bent out of shape by truly ancient controversies. Maybe even enough to "afford" a blacklashing? ;)

TPE, Non-TPE, sheesh on a lesah! People really do have a thing for the good old hate days, don't they? Look around you, sniff the air, smell what's there before it's wafted away. We are living in very different times and there are some extremely interesting scents on the breeze!



_____________________________

"A friend who bleeds is better" --placebo

"How seldom we recognize the sound when the bolt of our fate slides home." --thomas harris

(in reply to windchymes)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 6:51:28 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CaringandReal
TPE, Non-TPE, sheesh on a lesah! People really do have a thing for the good old hate days, don't they? Look around you, sniff the air, smell what's there before it's wafted away. We are living in very different times and there are some extremely interesting scents on the breeze!


Yeah, sorry, that was me. I had a kebab for lunch, with extra chilli sauce.

My bad.

(in reply to CaringandReal)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 9:42:37 AM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
Now returning to our original programming:

quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

Hello folks,
In response to the discussion of more intellectual?  indepth?  threads, I'm putting out something that has been niggling at my brain for a bit.

There are a lot of people on the fora that are "Lifestyle" people.  These are folks who really go with the whole TPE kind of dealio.  (Y'all know I'm down with that - if it makes you happy, nobody is being harmed, hey... have at it!).

I rarely see threads that are about "in the bedroom only" kind of folks.  Where do the Hanky Spankies fit in here? 

What comes up sometimes is the whole Domination / running the relationship thing, and often the folks who are just not into that aren't represented as much. 
The Tops and Bottoms are here, but the norms of the fora (which I did start a thread about recently) are generally about more intensive BDSM type relationships (not more intensive relationships - just ones that are more BDSM dynamically inclined). 

Am I off my rocker here? too sensitive? missing something because of a blind spot?

best,
sunshine



sunshine,

I think it is a good topic for discussion.

I have seen subtle and not so subtle prejudices towards people who just dabble.
Heck, after all, there are people who claim that unless you play in public, you aren't real.

I have seen people make comments along the lines of kinksters and spankos are really just vanillas in disguise.

I have read similar remaks about people who are just here for fetishes... "Go someplace else, we don't serve your kind here" or the more polite version "Wouldn't you be more comfortable with those of your own kind?"

In my current relationship, we started off D/s mostly in the bedroom and then it shifted to more of a M/s relationship. Likely it might not seem M/s to anyone who was "serious" but what matters is how we define it.

Primarily in the bedroom we play relatively soft.
Another vanilla in disguise...

_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 9:45:39 AM   
daddysprop247


Posts: 1712
Joined: 6/24/2005
From: DC Metro area
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CaringandReal



(amused)

Not that it's the least bit important anymore, but in my "years past" which I am guessing wildy were a few years before your "years past" people were afraid to admit online that they were in master/slave relationships becuase if they did they would recieve flack from all the top/bottom casual players promoting their endless play parties, dungeon fuckfests, hedonstic screwing of casual acquaintances or total strangers. In fact, terms like TPE were invented precisely because "master" and "slave" were so misunderstood, hated, and feared by the popular bdsm sceners at that time. It was an attempt, I now believe a misguided attempt, to soften the impact of that reality, to make it easier for others to acknowledge this way of doing kink as legitimate enough not to earn a burning at the stake.

There really was a time, not that long ago, when anybody who spoke of wanting a deeper relationship or of having more than casual play or the occasional "bonding of equals who happen to like kink" was deeply derided and attacked, told they were mentally ill and at the same totally arrogant and pushing that life onto others, and frequently threatened with being outed and reported to the police, by people who wanted them to just shut up so that they could get on with convincing newcomers to the Scene that the epitomy of their lives would be reached when said newbie was whipped by them....

TPE, Non-TPE, sheesh on a lesah! People really do have a thing for the good old hate days, don't they? Look around you, sniff the air, smell what's there before it's wafted away. We are living in very different times and there are some extremely interesting scents on the breeze!




CaringandReal, that was a valuable history lesson...it's funny (and depressing) how the more things change, the more they stay the same.

(in reply to CaringandReal)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 2:38:07 PM   
Toppingfrmbottom


Posts: 6528
Joined: 6/7/2009
Status: offline
There are bedroom only people out there, and there's room for them, perhaps though they're just quieter than the "lifestyle" people:)
quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss

Hello folks,
In response to the discussion of more intellectual?  indepth?  threads, I'm putting out something that has been niggling at my brain for a bit.

There are a lot of people on the fora that are "Lifestyle" people.  These are folks who really go with the whole TPE kind of dealio.  (Y'all know I'm down with that - if it makes you happy, nobody is being harmed, hey... have at it!).

I rarely see threads that are about "in the bedroom only" kind of folks.  Where do the Hanky Spankies fit in here? 

What comes up sometimes is the whole Domination / running the relationship thing, and often the folks who are just not into that aren't represented as much. 
The Tops and Bottoms are here, but the norms of the fora (which I did start a thread about recently) are generally about more intensive BDSM type relationships (not more intensive relationships - just ones that are more BDSM dynamically inclined). 

Am I off my rocker here? too sensitive? missing something because of a blind spot?

best,
sunshine



_____________________________

One world under lube with vibrators and dildo's for all! quote from the sex toy 101 book

(in reply to sunshinemiss)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 2:44:06 PM   
IceDemeter


Posts: 84
Status: offline
FR -

As a definite member of the Hanky Spanky group, I can't say that I've ever felt unwelcome or belittled here. There are some folks who tend to make derogatory comments about any lifestyle different from their own, but they are honestly the minority of what I see. Of course, when I see the first post from someone with that apparent attitude, I tend to ignore any of their further posts...

I have run in to much more disrepect about being a "vanilla with fur cuffs" from some at real life events than I see here - and even then, it's a small minority. Most are quite happy to be helpful when they realize that I'm there to learn and expand my own personal boundaries, without wanting to judge theirs. The relationship I am in lies somewhere in the grey area between purely bedroom and D/s, and is (as most relationships are) continually changing.

I have no issue whatsoever in being considered vanilla - albeit vanilla with sprinkles. It is the sprinkles that bring me here and to munches and to the vast list of BDSM books, as there really is no way to learn about them in the 'nilla world. The threads about "how-to" are very helpful, sometimes just in figuring out what someone gets out of a particular activity and fitting it in to my personal headspace as something I am or am not interested in pursuing.

The main reason that I keep coming back here to peruse the fora (besides the pure entertainment value of the trainwrecks) is that I find most of the posters here to be quite bravely open about their own lives and experiences and opinions even when they know full well that there is a high chance of getting trashed. Learning about some of the more extreme dynamics has been an eye-opener to me --- both in attempting to understand where they are coming from, and in accepting some parts of myself. There are some here who I feel great respect for, in how they communicate and how they are so positive about their relationships, even when I know that I would personally find those relationships horrifying. Yet, without their openness, there are things about myself that I would either not have recognized, or would have had a lot more difficulty in accepting.

I don't post because either someone has already said what I was thinking, or I didn't see the thread for ages after it was started (the whole "real life" thing does get in the way of reading here regularly) - NOT because I feel that my opinions are less valid because I'm not TPE, or that I'm concerned about being denigrated by those who live a lifestyle different from mine.

There most definitely IS room here for the Hanky Spankies --- the room the we each individually find or create in this little cyber-world. It is our choice as to whether that room is open and welcoming and has something to add to our lives, or if it is not...

Kudos to you, Sunshinemiss, for opening what you knew would be a can of worms (or poisonous snakes...) and giving a gentle reminder to those who are a bit more stuck in their ways that there ARE other viewpoints to be considered, too...

< Message edited by IceDemeter -- 11/18/2010 3:19:24 PM >

(in reply to VideoAdminTheta)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 4:06:40 PM   
IceDemeter


Posts: 84
Status: offline
FR ---

Sorry, sunshinemiss, for not noticing that passage and saying something - you see, I liked your topic (enought that I made my first post in well over a year!) and chose to ignore the obvious derailment (if the first sentence or so of a post isn't about the topic, I just don't bother reading it). There may be others who did the same.

Kudos again for starting the thread

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 5:10:08 PM   
VideoAdminTheta


Posts: 3967
Joined: 10/24/2009
Status: offline
The thread is now open. If your post has been removed it was either off topic, quoting a removed post, responding to a removed post or continuing to post the type of post a mod warned you not to.

Thank you

< Message edited by VideoAdminTheta -- 11/18/2010 6:41:28 PM >

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/18/2010 8:33:03 PM   
xssve


Posts: 3589
Joined: 10/10/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CaringandReal


quote:

ORIGINAL: windchymes

In years past, some people were afraid to admit that they were anything but hard-core, 24/7, TPE, Uber-Master & no-limits slave, etc., because they would receive flack from the "One True Way" types that looked down their noses at anyone who presented themselves as bedroom-kinky only.

I think this site has done a lot to open minds and promote acceptance of all types, so the kinksters are coming out into the daylight.

Also, some people get online and type a lot of fantasy. Just because you're reading about someone's house and barn full of slaves doesn't mean they actually exist. Online, you can be anybody you want.





(amused)

Not that it's the least bit important anymore, but in my "years past" which I am guessing wildy were a few years before your "years past" people were afraid to admit online that they were in master/slave relationships becuase if they did they would recieve flack from all the top/bottom casual players promoting their endless play parties, dungeon fuckfests, hedonstic screwing of casual acquaintances or total strangers. In fact, terms like TPE were invented precisely because "master" and "slave" were so misunderstood, hated, and feared by the popular bdsm sceners at that time. It was an attempt, I now believe a misguided attempt, to soften the impact of that reality, to make it easier for others to acknowledge this way of doing kink as legitimate enough not to earn a burning at the stake.

There really was a time, not that long ago, when anybody who spoke of wanting a deeper relationship or of having more than casual play or the occasional "bonding of equals who happen to like kink" was deeply derided and attacked, told they were mentally ill and at the same totally arrogant and pushing that life onto others, and frequently threatened with being outed and reported to the police, by people who wanted them to just shut up so that they could get on with convincing newcomers to the Scene that the epitomy of their lives would be reached when said newbie was whipped by them. You see, many a succulent piece of "fresh meat" was beginning to prick up its ears at all the tpe controversies, and wonder, "You mean there could be more to this than reporting to the world in explicit detail how I was single-tailed to a shred last weekend by the great master whipper, John Q. Scenester who then dumped me for a a chick he wanted to fuck more later that night? There is a psychological element to all of this? There might even be.. gasp... love? Or devotion? Or even someone who would want to control me outside of a short, shallow sexual scene that left me wanting so much more?" And when a few of the formerly master/slaves-now-TPEists stuck to their guns and responded with, "Yes. This is the way I happen to live, it's the way that makes me personally most happy and fulfilled, and you could have this too, if you want it badly enough" they were labeled elitist scum (aka "One True Wayists") as a way of discrediting and dismissing their discussion of their individual routes to happiness...and also pulling all the hot chicks away from the play parties. Certain monsterous ideologes, who shall go unnamed as it pleases me to observe their slowly drying flesh in the halls of the forgotten, seriously could not be happy unless everybody nodded and kowtowed to the great Scene Event in the Sky. Switches were the true royalty in those days. Twice as much kink experience as anybody else! ;)

The point of the above moldy history lesson is this: when it comes to controversy over sexual lifestyle choices within the bdsm umbrella, the wheel turns, the kalidscopic picture seems to change, but the patterns are still basically the same and they always repeat. Backlash against one form of opression generates, in its turn, those who backlash against the backlashers. (Ah, backlashing! I haven't had a good back lashing in such a long time--but I digress.) The people who talk about these things with such high dudgeon remind me of those families in which abuse is perpretrated. Parent beats kid. Kid grows up and beats his own kids. etc. Aside from getting totally off this mentally dysfunctional wheel, the only thing we can try to do is try to control our personal desires to repeat idiotic and utterly wasteful pattern of hatred and acrimony toward those wo do not act or believe as we do. Think of the wonderous things one could purchase with the hoard of emotional energy saved by not getting all bent out of shape by truly ancient controversies. Maybe even enough to "afford" a blacklashing? ;)

TPE, Non-TPE, sheesh on a lesah! People really do have a thing for the good old hate days, don't they? Look around you, sniff the air, smell what's there before it's wafted away. We are living in very different times and there are some extremely interesting scents on the breeze!
Awesome rant!

(in reply to CaringandReal)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 12:15:50 PM   
angelikaJ


Posts: 8641
Joined: 6/22/2007
Status: offline
Having had considerable time to think and reconsider my initial post was quite off the mark of the OP's intent.

I am very literal and it took my seeing it spelled out as non-TPE/non-27/7 for me to get what she was talking about.

Take 2:
I am in a non-27/7 relationship.
It is also non-TPE.

It is still M/s.


While this discussion is impossible to have without some compare/contrast with TPE-24/7, it is not about those relationships.
I have no idea if it is easier or harder than people who are in TPE-24/7 relationships as I have no experience with those.
I think the idea used was simplicity and I can understand that perspective.

I know I envy the people for whom obedience seems easy.

For me, surrender seems easier in the bedroom than it does pertaining to washing the dishes sometimes.
He appreciates the gift of my struggle. Not when I don't do something of course, but when there is some sort of internal reluctance and I do it anyway.

That's all i have for now.









_____________________________

The original home of the caffeinated psychotic hair pixies.
(as deemed by He who owns me)

http://www.collarchat.com/m_3234821/tm.htm

30 fluffy points!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQjuCQd01sg

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 1:57:05 PM   
IceDemeter


Posts: 84
Status: offline
FR ---

For me, having no experience in 24/7 or TPE or M/s --- well, I don't know how I would find it.

What I have found personally is that an initial interest in bedroom kink hasn't exactly stayed in the bedroom. The play and the spankings and the wild rough sex (nope - not in to edge play and am not a full masochist - does sensation junkie fit the bill?) were a great start and I found them great fun, although there was a wee bit of regret that I wasn't "normal" and some soul-searching required to accept that this is part of my needs and desires and nothing to get my knickers in a spin about.

The initial purely sexual responses were relatively easy for me to deal with (daytime: rule the world; playtime: on your knees; sleep; repeat as necessary --- all nicely segregated). However, those experiences were casual, with no emotional ties beyond friendship. Then I started a relationship with a man (and I'm highly tempted to steal barelynangel's reference to a MAN...) who has made it more than a little bit disconcerting and disturbing. I am discovering that I am apparently wired with not just the desire for physical domination, but also with the need to submit, emotionally and mentally.

Which is one of the places where things can get weird for us Hanky Spanky types - this wasn't anywhere in the original script, so where the heck is this coming from? This is an equal relationship - with nobody officially in charge except in play --- so how to deal with the carry-over of happy little subliness that wants to wander out of the bedroom with me?

This has become quite the topic of discussion for us, as he had no intentions of taking control outside of the bedroom, and neither of us is quite sure where we want to go with it yet. I do know that the desire to submit is to him alone (since I DO still rule the world during the day - well, my little part of it, anyways!) but I would love to hear how anyone else dealt with this and either brought it in to their relationship, or brought it under control so that it didn't impact the rest of the relationship...

I wonder if there don't seem many threads strictly about the Hanky Spanky because some folks seem to find that it morphs away from that into some version of D/s or even M/s with the HS being almost the intro...


< Message edited by IceDemeter -- 11/19/2010 2:02:30 PM >

(in reply to angelikaJ)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 2:18:04 PM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: IceDemeter


I wonder if there don't seem many threads strictly about the Hanky Spanky because some folks seem to find that it morphs away from that into some version of D/s or even M/s with the HS being almost the intro...



Except when it doesn't.

I've heard the same comparison made with switches... they're new and have no clue what they want so we'll call 'em a switch.

If kink activities don't morph into something more, does it follow that the person is only 'playing pretend' or that they just don't know what they want?

Are there 'levels' of commitment a person must go through to be seen as 'real'?

By the way..."sensation junkie" works for me.

(in reply to IceDemeter)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 3:12:33 PM   
IceDemeter


Posts: 84
Status: offline
Thanks, BonesFromAsh --- I'll have you know that I most definitely am a REAL sensation junkie!

Whether it changes into something else down the line doesn't change the fact of what I am and what I enjoy right now. When it comes to kink activities, I have no doubts about what I want, and it's no more "playing pretend" than anyone else's bedroom antics. Besides, "playing pretend" can be waaaay hot (so how did it manage to start being considered an insult?!?).

Thank you for so nicely pointing out my poor wording - I really didn't put across what I was meaning at all - probably because I had two different meanings in mind at the same time. My conscious meaning was that the THREADS morph in to something else, but my poor grammar didn't make that meaning very clear, did it?

Somewhere in the dim recesses of my mind I was also thinking that for me, I didn't have enough issues or questions or comments about the level of kink that I enjoy to start a thread, or really feel the need to jump in on an existing one. Where my personal angst, if you will, came in was at this beginning of an apparent morph into something different. It was this underlying thought that more clearly came through in what I said - although without the personal reference to give it proper perspective.

I seem to recall sunshinemiss saying something earlier in the thread about someone coming in with a question and all of the answers being 20 jumps ahead of where the questioner was starting from. That really resonated with me since I really enjoy the perspectives of those who have realized the type of person and relationship that makes them happy, regardless of which end of the bell-curve their interest in kink lies. There are some here who are purely HS, some who are 24/7 TPE, and most who are somewhere around the centre --- and ALL of their views are equally REAL.

Although --- can you really trust anything said by a "nilla with fur cuffs"?!?!?

(in reply to BonesFromAsh)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 3:39:31 PM   
BonesFromAsh


Posts: 1362
Joined: 6/17/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: IceDemeter

Thanks, BonesFromAsh --- I'll have you know that I most definitely am a REAL sensation junkie!


I'll keep that in mind.

quote:


Whether it changes into something else down the line doesn't change the fact of what I am and what I enjoy right now. When it comes to kink activities, I have no doubts about what I want, and it's no more "playing pretend" than anyone else's bedroom antics. Besides, "playing pretend" can be waaaay hot (so how did it manage to start being considered an insult?!?).


Which, in the end, is all that matters. You set the bar, along with your partner, and that's all that matters. To be honest, I've always been a bit put off when folks use "bedroom submissive" or "playing pretend" as a way to describe what they feel is somehow less than, which I think was sort of the jist of the op.

quote:


Thank you for so nicely pointing out my poor wording - I really didn't put across what I was meaning at all - probably because I had two different meanings in mind at the same time. My conscious meaning was that the THREADS morph in to something else, but my poor grammar didn't make that meaning very clear, did it?

Somewhere in the dim recesses of my mind I was also thinking that for me, I didn't have enough issues or questions or comments about the level of kink that I enjoy to start a thread, or really feel the need to jump in on an existing one. Where my personal angst, if you will, came in was at this beginning of an apparent morph into something different. It was this underlying thought that more clearly came through in what I said - although without the personal reference to give it proper perspective.


I wasn't really trying to point out anything in particular. Your post just caused me to form my own questions. It's normal for me to answer a question with a question, but thanks for clarifying.


quote:


I seem to recall sunshinemiss saying something earlier in the thread about someone coming in with a question and all of the answers being 20 jumps ahead of where the questioner was starting from. That really resonated with me since I really enjoy the perspectives of those who have realized the type of person and relationship that makes them happy, regardless of which end of the bell-curve their interest in kink lies. There are some here who are purely HS, some who are 24/7 TPE, and most who are somewhere around the centre --- and ALL of their views are equally REAL.


Funny you should mention that. There was a thread here recently where the OP was talking about what to do with a masochistic partner given that the OP always felt sadistic but never had a chance to explore it. The two examples I offered were very simplistic...wooden spoons and crops, oh and a quick word on how much I enjoy those free chopsticks you get with take-out chinese. Like I said to the OP...Rome wasn't built in a day. Seriously, you have to start somewhere and Bull Whips 101 might not be the best place to send a beginner. Mind you, other folks offered basic ideas too.

Regardless...pinch me, I'm real. Just as real as you and anyone else. Sometimes, though, I get the impression real, like normal, is relative.

quote:


Although --- can you really trust anything said by a "nilla with fur cuffs"?!?!?



HA! Fur cuffs...Long live the Fluff!!!!

(in reply to IceDemeter)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 5:57:01 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
I can relate to your absolute confusion and dismay at discovering you want to submit to him and that he wants to control you. We started as friends who were falling in love, who wanted to do bondage and have sex together. Eight years later control is now over such mundane things as car repairs. He usually does them himself. When he doesn't he picks the shop and he decides what has to be done. He has decreed that the brake fluid needs to be flushed and changed. I had no idea you ever did such a thing.

Hell, he even does the driving 90% of the time. I can't recall ever negotiating who gets to drive in all those careful talks about limits.

I'm coughing round the clock which led to him handing me Nyquil at noon and sending me to bed where I stayed all afternoon. Since when did I agree to him dosing me up and making me pass out? There's nothing fun or sexy about this. But it's as real as it gets.


_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to BonesFromAsh)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 6:29:25 PM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
Hi folks,

I've been thinking about this quite a lot while reading the choices thread.  It has given me the opportunity to combine some things things I've been thinking.  It seems to me that we truly are talking only levels here.  Relationships all require people to choose what's best for the relationship in order to maintain it.  The choice of what is best is the question for that particular couple (or set of people) and is really at the heart of the topic based on where you fall on the BDSM continuum. 

It looks like, the difference between HS people and the 24/7 people is the acknowledgement of reality.  On one end are the people who admit that there is a beginning and an end point, who admit that there is a choice.  The folks who are into the more M/s kind of relationship on the other end of the continuum pretend that there is no choice or have more rigidity within their choices.  Over and over I see people say - I have 2 choices - obey or leave.  After the relationship ends, they often realize that despite the rigidity they chose to live within there were other choices all along.

The existence and acknowledgment of choice by the HS people makes the M/s house of cards fall and that could be why so many responses are  dismissive of people who "play" rather than "live" the lifestyle.  We couldn't even talk about the possibility on this thread without a mod deleting a full 50% of the thread to allow the topic to exist.

I think that the choice to be in a more M/s relationship is a perfectly valid choice but so is the choice to not do that.  So is the choice to be completely vanilla and on this board.  Most of what we talk about is relationships.  I'd like to see more openness to talking about the fluidity of non-M/s relationships. 

best,
sunshine

< Message edited by sunshinemiss -- 11/19/2010 6:31:09 PM >


_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to BonesFromAsh)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 6:57:50 PM   
CaringandReal


Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: xssve

Awesome rant!



Thanks! Now if only I had been feeling rantish at the time, my life would be replete, er, complete.

But I'll settle for awesome.

Actually... no. I don't particularly like feeling awesome.

Miserable, anyone? :p

_____________________________

"A friend who bleeds is better" --placebo

"How seldom we recognize the sound when the bolt of our fate slides home." --thomas harris

(in reply to xssve)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/19/2010 7:01:37 PM   
CaringandReal


Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: CaringandReal
TPE, Non-TPE, sheesh on a lesah! People really do have a thing for the good old hate days, don't they? Look around you, sniff the air, smell what's there before it's wafted away. We are living in very different times and there are some extremely interesting scents on the breeze!


Yeah, sorry, that was me. I had a kebab for lunch, with extra chilli sauce.

My bad.


_You_ caused all of this troublesome flame-war nostalgia? (suspicious look). Well, as long as it wasn't a longpig kebab, you can probably be forgiven. :/

_____________________________

"A friend who bleeds is better" --placebo

"How seldom we recognize the sound when the bolt of our fate slides home." --thomas harris

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/20/2010 10:47:04 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
Where does bedroom-only end and D/s begin?  The woman in my life is my equal outside the bedroom, but she sleeps in my collar and restraints, and calls herself my slut.  I don't see how such behavior can limit itself to just the bedroom. It radiates out to all aspects of our interactions in small ways.

I think the premise of much of this thread discussion is mistaken.  Instead of D/s and hanky-spanky being fundamentally different, discriminating against each other, etc., I think they are virtually the same.  Anyone who makes a romantic life commitment to another person is transferring over power.  Period.  It doesn't matter how they identify.  The only "real" authority transfer occurs when one person falls in love and the other person doesn't care.


_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to CaringandReal)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Hanky Spanky - 11/20/2010 4:59:24 PM   
IceDemeter


Posts: 84
Status: offline
FR ---

For me, the "fluidity" of the relationship is exactly what I'm realizing - where things ooze from equal-equal to something nowhere near that. In many ways it appears that it would be easier to say that everything is his decision (I can only say "appears" since I've never been in that position and don't expect to be), as it can get disconcerting when he pops up with something out of the blue that comes out as more of an order or a statement that "this is how it shalt be", or when I automatically comply with no discussion on something that we both know I don't intellectually agree with. Definitely not situations that came up in discussing "limits"!

I'm chuckling away right now at DesFIP's fabulous example of the driving --- that is SOOOO what is going on here right now! I'm a travelling sales wench who puts on ridiculous mileage every year, and never trusts anyone else to drive.....but, somehow, now my vehicle is parked at the end of each day and it doesn't even occur to me to question that it will be him driving. Just where did THAT come from?!? Apparently the same place that has resulted in me sitting here drinking the fourth glass of water that I don't want because he decided that I might be slightly dehydrated....

So far things like this have just happened spontaneously - not as a result of discussion about changing the nature of the relationship. I'm just riding with it to see where it goes from here - with much optimism that it will work out to a joyful HS - D/s compromise that I see a few great examples of here on the boards. I just hope that those folks keep posting for those, like me, who get somewhat flustered at times with this fluidity!

(in reply to RedMagic1)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Hanky Spanky Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109