quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

I have a small bit of gold.  For the common man- silver is more doable. So silver is what I buy.  I stack it and forget about it.     (I tried food storage- but do not have a nack for it) IMO it does not hurt to have a well stocked house.

Thanks for the shout.     :-)

For sure. You don't even have to believe in apocalyptic stuff for that, a good tornado or earthquake'll have you grateful.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Elisa,   the system does tell us everything they do and intend to do.   You simply must focus to hear the message.    They DO tell us.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

feudal state' in any historic sense/snip

care to surmise on robo signers and the fraudulent foreclosures?

Which the sheriff of your hometown just put on hold.. Dart may be the only sheriff in the country to have done so.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Elisa,   the system does tell us everything they do and intend to do.   You simply must focus to hear the message.    They DO tell us.

Yeah like this thread topic...all it boils down to is that all land within US borders is considered US soil, subject to US law (with exceptions made for reservations) and there's really nothing nefarious about that.

The absolute ownership RO is talking about is like the medieval idea of independent dukedoms, only on a micro-scale. He's talking about voluntary association with the US government (what would that even be, if there's no such thing as US soil outside of national parks?) although I don't think he'd like needing his passport stamped to pull out of his driveway in Realonia onto an American road.

The alternative simply is not viable. It would be chaotic for landowners and oppressive for non-landowners. It's not a 'feudal state' in any historic sense, you might as well call it a commune because everyone contributes to the general upkeep.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Well, you are certainly drowning as always.

Let's suppose for a moment, that the USA was taken from the indians (seems like a safe bet) and that out east the british sort of claimed it, and at a subsequent time (after several Kings had passed on and ended at George) they said fuck it and threw off the british.  Then (and lets not quibble the wars, the politics and so on) they subsequently as a government bought land in the form of the louisianna purchase, alaska, and so on, and wrested a bunch of land from mexico,  such that a majority of that fledgling nation had a stakehold in it.  Then at some point, someone said, hey, we need some wheat, some corn, someone to guard our borders, someone to be fruitful and multiply thereon, in short, settlers, so they gave out deeds to those that could hold it and work it. 

Then as time passed, inheritances were divied up, to sons, land was bought and sold for some had more than they needed, and some had less than they needed.

Now, it comes to pass that say (for example) a family line dies out, and that last holder of the deed and the breath dies intestate (since you have such poor etymology, and no real understanding of words and their meanings; it means without balls.....)

So, you now see that the placid state of affairs should be a hole there, a no-mans land where once land was, that lies fallow and barren, a grey spot right there in the middle earth.......

You need to come up for air, sonny. The lack of oxygen to your brain is showing you off in a very bad light.    

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Which system had 13 original star signs?

quote:


According to this trippy hippy site the Mayans had 19.
http://www.energy-healing-info.com/mayan-astrology-signs.html
And according to wiki they had 20.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_zodiac

quote:


What systems are you referencing?
ETA: The star sign Ophiuchus (fuck that's awkward to spell) isn't included in any traditional zodiac.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ophiuchus_(astrology)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Swearing on the testicles is recorded in the Bible. The practice is mentioned in the Old Testament, though the King James’ version bowdlerised the reference in Genesis to “grasping the thigh”.

The Biblical reference implies that the person is swearing on the testicles of the king, not on their own.


Check it out.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella

Yeah like this thread topic...all it boils down to is that all land within US borders is considered US soil, subject to US law (with exceptions made for reservations) and there's really nothing nefarious about that.

quote:


The absolute ownership RO is talking about is like the medieval idea of independent dukedoms, only on a micro-scale. He's talking about voluntary association with the US government (what would that even be, if there's no such thing as US soil outside of national parks?) although I don't think he'd like needing his passport stamped to pull out of his driveway in Realonia onto an American road.

quote:


The alternative simply is not viable. It would be chaotic for landowners and oppressive for non-landowners. It's not a 'feudal state' in any historic sense, you might as well call it a commune because everyone contributes to the general upkeep.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

I am not willing to do YOUR homework and that means that I AM NOT WILLING TO TEACH YOU LAW.

Now do you understand what I said?  I gave you the sources that prove my point, not that it means anything to you because you do not understand how to correctly interpret law.

Now since you want to dismiss this as bullshit why dont YOU EXPAND on whatever you read in that link that you THINK supports your position by telling us precisely how it all relates with strict peculiarity in application such that it justifies your position then I will be happy to do a follow up and correct you.

knock yourself out man!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nslavu

I thought it was funny.

I also think it funny that you buy the 'libral meeja' without question.

As for nonsense, some people have a great deal of money and are bleeding it from every source they can, including you. They print money at will, then disperse it, attaching interest, so it's fake money raping value at every level of humanity in the interest cloud. The only proof necessary of this is the inequity of income dispersement and how deeply mortgaged your (and many other) country's future is. Those things are worth questioning. I don't see it as a conspiracy so much as some greedy fucks maximizing self interest on the backs of an ignorant populace. It's major nonsense, so if bringing truth to nonsense is your real purpose you might consider investigating the libral meeja nonsense.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

I am not willing to do YOUR homework and that means that I AM NOT WILLING TO TEACH YOU LAW.

Now do you understand what I said?  I gave you the sources that prove my point, not that it means anything to you because you do not understand how to correctly interpret law.

Now since you want to dismiss this as bullshit why dont YOU EXPAND on whatever you read in that link that you THINK supports your position by telling us precisely how it all relates with strict peculiarity in application such that it justifies your position then I will be happy to do a follow up and correct you.

knock yourself out man!

Just as I thought, you cant substantiate your claim but instead try and switch things around. I gave you a link to the Treaty of Paris, show me why that isnt in effect.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nslavu
I thought it was funny.
I also think it funny that you buy the 'libral meeja' without question.
As for nonsense, some people have a great deal of money and are bleeding it from every source they can, including you. They print money at will, then disperse it, attaching interest, so it's fake money raping value at every level of humanity in the interest cloud. The only proof necessary of this is the inequity of income dispersement and how deeply mortgaged your (and many other) country's future is. Those things are worth questioning. I don't see it as a conspiracy so much as some greedy fucks maximizing self interest on the backs of an ignorant populace. It's major nonsense, so if bringing truth to nonsense is your real purpose you might consider investigating the libral meeja nonsense.

What did I believe from the liberal media ?  I made a direct quotation from a bonafide source proving RO was wrong. Pahunk still cant prove his claim about the Magna Carta. It seems you are dumb enough to believe them but that's cool.
Edited for typing.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nslavu

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nslavu
I thought it was funny.
I also think it funny that you buy the 'libral meeja' without question.
As for nonsense, some people have a great deal of money and are bleeding it from every source they can, including you. They print money at will, then disperse it, attaching interest, so it's fake money raping value at every level of humanity in the interest cloud. The only proof necessary of this is the inequity of income dispersement and how deeply mortgaged your (and many other) country's future is. Those things are worth questioning. I don't see it as a conspiracy so much as some greedy fucks maximizing self interest on the backs of an ignorant populace. It's major nonsense, so if bringing truth to nonsense is your real purpose you might consider investigating the libral meeja nonsense.

What did I believe from the liberal media ?  I made a direct quotation from a bonafide source proving RO was wrong. Pahunk still cant prove his claim about the Magna Carta. It seems you are dumb enough to believe them but that's cool.
Edited for typing.

You mean in the pejorative sense of course.... gratuitous verbal abuse doesn't actually raise you above the dumb whoever you may point at. Factually speaking I have mode NO comment on the issue above (magna carta)pro or con, of which you accuse me of dumbness in belief. A deductive fallacy. Talk about 'feed me bullshit.'

Your liberal media influence was noted in counter conspiracy postings.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nslavu

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

What did I believe from the liberal media ?  I made a direct quotation from a bonafide source proving RO was wrong. Pahunk still cant prove his claim about the Magna Carta. It seems you are dumb enough to believe them but that's cool.
Edited for typing.

You mean in the pejorative sense of course.... gratuitous verbal abuse doesn't actually raise you above the dumb whoever you may point at. Factually speaking I have mode NO comment on the issue above (magna carta)pro or con, of which you accuse me of dumbness in belief. A deductive fallacy. Talk about 'feed me bullshit.'

Your liberal media influence was noted in counter conspiracy postings.

um....what the heck is that called again, personal or personality tranference?  In psychology its when person A, summarizes precisely what person A is doing or about to do and switches it around to blame person B (target) opponent.  I wont get into the serious long term psychological implications and consequences.  Substituting the issues of one person with another is a different dysfunction when its habitual or a matter of course.