quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I have never brought my orientation into play, except as a giggle so dont even pull that bullshit on me.
proper english sentance structure is your friend
case in point you said and this is a quote

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
We were talking for just shy of an hour and 1/2 discussing why gardening and the mating rituals of slugs of course.

who what now??
"discussing why  gardening and the mating rituals of slugs"....what?
it makes no sense, NONE
why gardening and the mating rituals of slugs can pass a morning pleasantly?
what
you make no sense
or NONSENSE
Im not going to waste more time
but no definitely not interesting, I would rather stick pointy sticks in my eyes and  rattlesnakes up my arse than read what you have to say about anything
I was just offering some constructive criticism

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I know this will seem picky RO, but why is a document written before the 1776 more important than a document written after it ? After all what you just posted to Lucy was written in 1774 long before the Treaty of Paris some nine years later.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nslavu

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nslavu

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

What did I believe from the liberal media ?  I made a direct quotation from a bonafide source proving RO was wrong. Pahunk still cant prove his claim about the Magna Carta. It seems you are dumb enough to believe them but that's cool.
Edited for typing.

You mean in the pejorative sense of course.... gratuitous verbal abuse doesn't actually raise you above the dumb whoever you may point at. Factually speaking I have mode NO comment on the issue above (magna carta)pro or con, of which you accuse me of dumbness in belief. A deductive fallacy. Talk about 'feed me bullshit.'

Your liberal media influence was noted in counter conspiracy postings.

um....what the heck is that called again, personal or personality tranference?  In psychology its when person A, summarizes precisely what person A is doing or about to do and switches it around to blame person B (target) opponent.  I wont get into the serious long term psychological implications and consequences.  Substituting the issues of one person with another is a different dysfunction when its habitual or a matter of course.

You mean like "morons always do that 'psychological projection' shit". I was leaving out the projection because most people know about it... and besides it's just plain fun to call someone a maroon or a pant-load, no real harm done.

The deductive fallacy was far more interesting.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

I have never brought my orientation into play, except as a giggle so dont even pull that bullshit on me.
proper english sentance structure is your friend
case in point you said and this is a quote

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
We were talking for just shy of an hour and 1/2 discussing why gardening and the mating rituals of slugs of course.

who what now??
"discussing why  gardening and the mating rituals of slugs"....what?
it makes no sense, NONE
why gardening and the mating rituals of slugs can pass a morning pleasantly?
what
you make no sense
or NONSENSE
Im not going to waste more time
but no definitely not interesting, I would rather stick pointy sticks in my eyes and  rattlesnakes up my arse than read what you have to say about anything
I was just offering some constructive criticism

well you made reference to talking the way I am on a kink board or some crap like that. so what the hell it was fair game LOL

Yeh attorneys on the legislative council always spend that kind of time talking about gardening and the mating habits of slugs...  LMAO

Thats what they get paid for!

quote:

ORIGINAL: PorcHouse


Real0ne, I haven't read the whole topic, just the first two pages, but I would strongly recommend you to check out this link:

http://www.freestateproject.org/

And this radio show:

http://www.freetalklive.com/

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
FR
I am not reading this whole thread.

quote:


Allodial means without lord. That means you are the lord. Nobody gets that type of title or deed today, fact. File in your common Law courts all you want but when the taxman comes, you know the difference, bigtime.
If you actually have allodial title, you can then charge tolls from those who wish to travel down your road(s), you can do alot of other things as well. In a sense the government has allodial title to every blade of grass in their jurisdiction. You can only be a holder, and that also means a holder in goosd grace with the REAL owner(s), which are they who are more powerful than you. It has been that way for millenia, but now it seems to be disguised.
Society cannot exist without structure. Previously this subjugation was used to keep undesirables out, but that is no longer politically correct for the serfs. Only the big boys are allowed to do it. Anything hidden eventually shows, and this is showing as a class war.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I know this will seem picky RO, but why is a document written before the 1776 more important than a document written after it ? After all what you just posted to Lucy was written in 1774 long before the Treaty of Paris some nine years later.

Hey I cant begin to imagine how you construed that and what you are driving at.

Our Saxon ancestors held their lands, as they did their personal property, in absolute dominion, disencumbered with any superior, answering nearly to the nature of those possessions which the Feudalists term Allodial.

kool huh!

judges in america have construed alodial to mean feudal when the record shows it was not.

Little problem in dodge

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

No you were trying to obfuscate with the orientation, not make it fair game, it was a lame attempt too, not worth responding to.
and the quote, still makes no sense in any english comprehension way either, you are missing some vital puntuation or ommitted a couple of words
and this is pandemic in your posts
it makes them unreadable, and therefore of little interest beyond constructive criticism

We were talking for just shy of an hour and 1/2 discussing why gardening and the mating rituals of slugs of course.
makes nonsense of the english language
you cant communicate properly...thats not my fault, or my problem, its yours

quote:

ORIGINAL: PorcHouse
Real0ne, I haven't read the whole topic, just the first two pages, but I would strongly recommend you to check out this link:
http://www.freestateproject.org/
And this radio show:
http://www.freetalklive.com/

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Im sure they sound so supportive in your head.
be happy with them they are your friends
Im putting you back on ignore
one less irritant for the day ahead

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Well if I wanted to really have fun I would write in mathematically provable quantum syntax language which is a manner in which one establishes fact that the meaning is mathematically provable and cannot be constructed any way but intended and it can also be read in either direction with the same meaning and directly translates into 5000 languages. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Well if I wanted to really have fun I would write in mathematically provable quantum syntax language which is a manner in which one establishes fact that the meaning is mathematically provable and cannot be constructed any way but intended and it can also be read in either direction with the same meaning and directly translates into 5000 languages. 

Well, do so that it is readily apparent to anyone who speaks any of the 5000 languages.  Or is english, french, spanish, italian, mandarin chinese, japanese and portugese not on that list.