|
Edwynn -> RE: Wikileaks (12/10/2010 11:39:55 PM)
|
CM is about 15 years behind the times as to how forums work, so for technical reasons that would take too long to explain, this is a continuation of the above.
This is an excerpt from a forum that I'm not providing the link for because it involves my profession, but it is from a Swedish citizen.
"With our Swedish laws being a bit odd and different from other countries, to begin with he has not yet been charged with rape. Only accused. This discrepancy compared to British law has caused some issues already.
The scenario is apparently that he had consensual sex a couple of times with this woman, and then afterwards he woke up in the middle of the night and "hit it on" again while she was asleep. No violence was involved, in any way. Since she wanted sex earlier that evening and night, he probably thought it to be OK. (She was the one that actively contacted him and tried to step into his life, btw) And it seems it was OK until a few days later, when she found out he had been sexing it on with another woman. When they both found out they weren't planned to become his wife they started the whole carousel. There are SMS and Twitter messages from the women after the rape and molestation dates where they were braggingly and happily mentioning Assange in a positive way. Only several days later, once the women got together, it became rape and so forth.
The initial prosecutor dropped the charges immediately, the second one didn't. There were leaks from the police to the press at this time. Between this, a highly questionable lawyer took charge of the women and their case (whith is really not theirs anymore). This man has said that the women did not know if they had been raped or not, because they are not lawyers. (I kid you not) Assange stayed in Sweden for forty days waiting to be heard a second time, nothing happened until he left the country. (There was no legal cause hindering him to do so, either)
And since a rape accusation in Sweden automatically becomes a public accusation, the woman is out of the picture and the prosecution will own and lead the case even if the woman would take it all back. The lawyer can run such an errand for ages, and get paid while doing so. This in itself is a sad state of affairs that has negative consequences on every serious accusation of rape, but that's Sweden for you. (The former politician and lawyer of the two women, he owns a law firm together with another politician, they actually created this new law and then they started a law firm that specialised in these kind of cases...)
Go figure."
And even more interesting:
http://my.firedoglake.com/kirkmurphy/2010/12/04/assanges-chief-accuser-has-her-own-history-with-us-funded-anti-castro-groups-one-of-which-has-cia-ties/
Miss Ardin has an interesting educational and professional history, to say the least, and also an intriguing way of finding finance for her world travels for both education and magical appearances in certain locations at the most convenient times for her sponsors. She even had enough travel expense account to provide for Assange's travel tickets to accommodate their affair, and then for her to escape most recently to the West Bank and leave the idiots in Sweden high and dry. It just shows what you can do with an anti-Castro grad thesis and then go about signing up with every leftist organization you can, so the media later gets confused and would try to claim that a leftist and Assange accuser must be legit in her claim because she's a leftist, so because she's sympathetic to the cause and would normally be forgiving, if she says rape, it must actually be that the bastard raped her.
But as to the event, she then called "Sarah" and says "your boyfriend fucked me a few days ago, how does that sit with you? Oh shit! You're pissed off? Let's go to the police, I have a plan ... "
But it just keeps getting even more interesting.
http://investmentwatchblog.com/really-arrest-warrant-for-sex-crimes-against-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange-is-only-for-sex-without-a-condom/
The above link explains what the Swedish poster in my earlier post here was talking about regarding the law firm, and how they set up the law firm to accommodate those seeking redress under a law they created in the first place. Who says Europeans can't learn anything from the American way of doing business?
I'll paste a response from another Swedish citizen from the link immediately preceding:
Interesting conspiracy tidbits on the Swedish “rape” charges -
1. The original prosecutor in charge, Eva Finné, dropped the charges the same week they were made and stated they were groundless.
2. The two women who accused Assange, Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilen, know each other. (Note: these names are public now so this isn’t breaking news).
3. Eva Finné was removed from the case by Claes Borgström and a new prosecutor, Marianne Ny, was appointed. Her first act was to reinstate the charges.
4. Claes Borgström is a former politician. His law partner is Thomas Bodström. Thomas Bodström is Sweden’s former Minister of Justice.
5. Thomas Bodström is currently in the USA. One could assume he is communicating and coordinating things with his partner back in Sweden.
6. It is Swedish protocol not to release the names of people accused of rape until after a conviction. The Swedish prosecutors office claims they have “no idea” how Assange’s name was leaked.
7. Normally Swedish media will not publish an accused’s name until after a conviction. Swedish media is controlled by a single ruling class family named Bonnier who work closely with local politicians to protect their media monopoly.
8. Claes Borgström’s two sisters, Annette Kullenberg and Kerstin Vinterhed, both work for Bonnier family newspapers.
9. Anna Ardin and Thomas Bodström are high ranking members of the right wing Christian political organization “Socialdemokrat-Brödraskapet”.
10. Claes Borgström is a right wing politician whose push for larger big brother powers for the Swedish state were leaked by Wikileaks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Bodstr%C3%B6m http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claes_Borgstr%C3%B6m http://www.aklagare.se/Media/Nyheter/Assange-arendet-fragor-och-svar/ (In Swedish – the Swedish justice department says they did not release Assange’s name and try to explain why Eva Finné was removed)
http://henrikalexandersson.blogspot.com/2010/08/assange-affaren-far-en-inrikespolitisk.html (In Swedish – a Swedish blogger traces the reasons for Ardin, Borgström, and Bodström’s apparent vendetta against Wikileaks and Assange)
Lets review and consider one last item there;
9. Anna Ardin (the second accuser, who called up the first and said "I fucked your boyfriend") and Thomas Bodström , who sponsored and wrote these laws and then set up practice to profit from them, are high ranking members of the right wing Christian political organization “Socialdemokrat-Brödraskapet”.
This is just too much fun.
But I'll say this
Everybody seems to be worried about the safety of Assange, but history tells us the story of another anti-Castro figure that got displayed as a 'leftist,' and look what happened to him.
Keep you head low, Ms. Ardin.
|
|
|
|
