daddysprop247
Posts: 1712
Joined: 6/24/2005 From: DC Metro area Status: offline
|
i'll share a little story with you folks...go on, sit a spell. hehe, just kidding... anywho, there was a man my Master had me serve a couple of years back, almost weekly for nearly a year, who happened to be 6'5" and about 350-360 lbs. a very very big guy...and no, there wasn't much muscle weight there. however believe it or not i still find him sexually appealing, because of his confidence, good nature, and because well i'm a perv and have a thing for being squished. *blush* however as much as i liked him and respected him as a human being, he would never be the type of man i could belong to because he completely lacked dominance. now when some hear that word, dominance, they think of spankings and paddles and whips and chains and such, which of course has nothing to do with the word. by lacking dominance, i mean he was completely non-authoritative and also, more relevant to this discussion, he completely lacked self-discipline and control. he was so heavy not because of medical conditions (oh he had some, but they were all weight-related), but because he simply loved to eat rich foods in mass quantities, and loathed exercise. during my time with him, if we were not engaging in sexual activity then no more than an hour would go by without him eating, and eating a lot. sometimes i am pretty sure he was even unaware that he was eating, it was almost reflexive. he also lacked discipline and control in other areas of his life...with his wife, who he allowed to relegate him to sleeping in a separate room of the house he had built and paid for, and with friends who regularly held out their hands to him for cash. he was a nice man, but not a dominant man, not a man of authority and control. and my point in that little tale is this...there's nothing wrong with a submissive woman deciding that she needs a man of authority and control in her life. and there's nothing wrong with noting qualities in men which may indicate a lack of this authority and control, and determining that such men would not be a good fit. yes, in this case in particular, where we are talking about profiles on the internet, it requires making some assumptions, and in doing so some are bound to slip through the cracks. but again, first impressions are important, and we all make assumptions and judgments at times based on those first impressions. i wonder, if this topic had been about a man's credit score or savings account, would it have gotten the same quantity of negative responses?
< Message edited by daddysprop247 -- 11/30/2010 12:24:41 PM >
|