|
Real0ne -> RE: The Living Constitution (12/1/2010 4:38:18 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl
Ya know, RO, i started this thread because i could not wrap my head around the issue i brought up in the OP. Its pretty clear by my question that either i was being snarky, or i truly didnt understand. Welp, i wasnt being snarky. But reading your explanations tend to make my eyes glaze over.
Lets make this clearer.
I am not a lawyer, i am a nurse.
I have never studied law.
Never been to law school.
Have no desire to do so.
Yet i do want to learn more about the history and politics of the country that i live in.
So, either dummy it up for me till i catch up to speed or shut up. Because, man, frankly, with the way you post, your giving me a migraine.
I am doing the best I can to reduce the "menagerie" called law which IS what rules this joint regardless of how fucked up it is to its lowest common denominator which is very difficult for people who are not versed in it.
BUT never fear
"IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE"
all 60,000,000 (million) of them.
Google books digitizing all these old documents is a researchers dream come true.
If you think you are having a hard time imagine what I and others went through and we are still not through that maze.
Here is precisely what you are up against:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goFxos6tz-o
I know I know you seen it before, well now you know what it means. Humor yourself and listen to it again from start to finish and think about what he is saying and compare it to what I put up here and that will give you an understanding what you face when you walk this road.
The intent was that americans did not need to study law and the government would be self correcting. well its not.
George explains the reality of it to a T.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acLW1vFO-2Q
When was the last time you heard of a common law "Grand Jury" knocking out some bullshit supreme court ruling?
The common people do not know how to do that and they buried it so getting remedy in law is like trying to thread a needle on a roller coaster in the dark.
since the staff attorney did not know the law I thought I would help and emailed this to him:
[image]http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/stuff/jury-factandlaw.jpg[/image]
details freaking details, funny how lawmakers always manage to forget those insignificant little details when it comes to usurping power and money!
Now how many people who have served on a jury have been told that eh? I can answer that one for you ZIPPO!
In fact they are told just the opposite and they are instructed what they (the court) can hear as evidence and how they must determine the outcome!! (judge stacks deck)
All the while the jury not knowing the true power they have! They can tell that judge to go fuck himself.
in my last post correct this:
quote:
I explained the 16th amend where the courts as he claimed was the bulwark and gate keeper to stop anything unlawful, being capable of legislating "outlaw" without accountability created the 16th amendment with no authority to do so overruling the determinations of the courts and likewise with the 14th, again in violation of con law.
to read this:
I explained the 16th amend where the courts as he claimed was the bulwark and gate keeper to stop anything unlawful, can be and are being overruled by a legislature that has no requirement (in his words) to legislate law in conformance with the constitution and in fact do legislate "outlaw" without accountability as they did when they created the 16th amendment with no authority to do so overruling the determinations of the courts and likewise with the 14th, again in violation of con law and there is no record of any referendums anywhere that the people ever got a vote on any of these matters. It was the club members as George stated that do it for us because "we the people are incompetent"
Having a life OTHER than law is no excuse!
|
|
|
|
