Awareness
Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact In other words, you are basing your assumptions on things that people type up on the screen that you have no recognizable proof to know if they are accurate or not. I thought as much. Yes, because self-testimony in person is always so much more accurate. And when we meet people we're all gifted with instantly recognisable proof of what they say and do, how they think and what they had for lunch. Christ, you're a worry. quote:
Which is what helps to perpetuate such myths to begin with. You are basing your conclusions on what you think, rather than what you know. I could easily assume another screen name and type up fairy tales that could be absolutely believable. None of which would be based in reality, but I'm willing to bet I could have some folks thinking that was what a female led dynamic was really about. Oh for fuck's sake. Reality is inherently subjective, everyone makes conclusions based upon what they think. The only knowledge it's possible to have is self-knowledge. The rest is a construction of beliefs - the value of which is their ability to synthesise based upon current perception and predict the future. You don't "know" anything, you simply have beliefs which are stronger than others based upon the value you've ascribed to them. What you consider 'facts' are pieces of data which your belief structures have weighted accordingly, but they're true in a subjective sense, not an objective one. quote:
I am a lot of things, but I can promise you that stupid is not one of them. The jury's still out. Based upon what passes for reason in your mind, I'm not prepared to buy your self-testimony on this. quote:
Considering that you don't have a shred of actual knowledge on the subject, other than what you've read on the internet, you might want to think about the source. What you might see, if you were actually acquainted with any female Dominants away from the screen, is based much more in reality. Ah, I see. So... what you're saying is "True femdom only shows its true face at local events". I seem to recall covering this. Basically, what you're saying - despite the proliferation of indications to the contrary - is that perceptions of femdom are entirely the fault of the individual doing the observing. Everything online is a screaming bunch of lies, people fake up profiles, write journals and interact online in ways which dramatically mis-represent poor femdom while a core of true believers keeps the faith alive at local gatherings - much like the Tea Party in the USA. I find your contention ridiculous and your automatically defensive response reveals a mind ill-equipped to consider opposing points of view.
|