joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
Does this new life form, state, how it became as it did? Not just theory, but evidence to support its structure? Since Evolution is the basis of change given time. While new forms of life are interesting, the evidence should be kept current and factual. If this life form just 'came' in to being, one might argue its from God. Or, that we humans, in our arrogance, overlooked something right under our noses. All I see in this article of the OP, besides the curiously interesting lifeform, is merely an attack on religion. That a group of atheists feel justified in attacking other religions, and hoping people agree, its 'ok' for one side to attack and be immune to counter attacks. Science does not survive on this 'zero-sum' attitude. It surivives on the collection of evidence from tests and observations. Just because your an atheist, does not give you a divine right, to attack other religions with impunity. And if attacked, to simply hide behind some sort of metaphorical wall (i.e. science). Funny, some of you would attack Christians if they, themselves, did this, but are purely 'ok' with doing it back at them without consideration, compassion, or even wisdom. Have you NOT learned how religious wars get their start? If you want to debate the lifeform itself. How it could have come in to being, how it may have changed with time from some other form (known or otherwise). The enviroment to which it exists in, or maybe adapt to others. Or how such a lifeform, might be useful to us humans. That would be an 'ok' discussion. If you wish to make this a purely religious 'whose dick is bigger', then your simply playing the same game that's been played for thousands of recorded years. Same crap, different religious/belief.
|