maybemaybenot -> RE: Where is God ? (12/6/2010 1:05:41 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonhead Why would I not accept that? It's pretty self evident. However, for a lot of religions, these sorts of proscriptions are part of the deal, and if you want the religion, you have to accept them, whether you like it or not. To my way of thinking, that's more of a loss of autonomy than choosing to go vegan or abhor the vertical slam dance, or whatever. It is autonomous in that they chose to participate in that religion and they have chosen to accept the restrictions of that religion. At some point in time, adults of any faith, make a choice to live the life that their particular religion sets forth. You may see it as confining and a loss of autonomy, and for you that would be true, but for others it is not at all. You need look no further than this site to understand that not everyone wants/needs/desires to live in complete autonomy. I suspect that you would have no issue with a Dominant restricting their sub from a particular behavior, food, clothing choice ? Does that not make the sub as " bad " as a Mormon, Jew or Buddhist ? They are giving up complete autonomy for some one other than themselves. We give up complete autonomy all the time in life. Why does it really matter to you that some may chose to give up their autonomy to their God ? Why does that make religion " bad ". You have given up your autonomy by being owned, your owner has set down guidelines for your relationship. If you want to continue your relationship you must accept the word of your owner, like it or not. I see little difference in that than I do to a Mormon not drinking coffee. I know you are a couple profile and I am not sure which party I am addressing, but if it is the Owner, just reverse what I said to you in the last paragraph. mbmbn
|
|
|
|