RE: Shared PC and Emails (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

DarkSteven -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/29/2010 6:16:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

The OP had installed a hacking program on the computer- that is different then using someones password that it left out in a note by the computer. So on that- he is guilty.



You lost me.  The OP is tazzygirl.  The alleged hacker is Leon Walker, who used a password and did not hack.  Neither one used a hacking program.  Who are you referring to, that installed a hacking program?



rulemylife -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/29/2010 9:07:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

If they were married when he peeked then it is legal.  If they were divorced when he peeked then it is not.  A married couple is considered one person.



I'll be breathlessly awaiting your legal citation for this.



chuckles.   I know this because I filed a complaint against my grandfather who opened a letter I sent to my grandmother.   Nothing could be done as they were married.  It was a mute point.



First of all, you keep constantly using this phrase and constantly getting it wrong.  It's moot, not mute.

Second, no one has the right to open another person's mail regardless of their relationship to that person.


18 USC 1702 - Obstruction of correspondence

Whoever takes any letter, postal card, or package out of any post office or any authorized depository for mail matter, or from any letter or mail carrier, or which has been in any post office or authorized depository, or in the custody of any letter or mail carrier, before it has been delivered to the person to whom it was directed, with design to obstruct the correspondence, or to pry into the business or secrets of another, or opens, secretes, embezzles, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.



plushiecat -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/29/2010 9:31:22 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Its not a moot ... and the word is moot, not mute... point. She would have to file the complaint.


First off, the point was gotten across.  It was known that 'moot' was meant.  And, if you are going to insist on picking at someone's spelling, grammar, or the like, perhaps you should realise (that is an accepted spelling, by the way) that your first word should be "It's" with an apostrophe, not a possessive.



tazzygirl -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/29/2010 11:38:50 PM)

Changed my mind.

I should care what you think... why?



Moonhead -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 5:29:37 AM)

Because he's more important than you are, and so you must respect him big time.
(It's one of the stock arguments from idiots on here, I've noticed.)



Termyn8or -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 5:55:39 AM)

FR FFS

"or to pry into the business or secrets of another, "

This is not another under the law. The same law that prevents the prosecution from compelling her to testify against him makes this point nulll and void. And being email, even if he deleted it, she could retrieve it, which means he did not obstruct it's delivery in any significant way.

Of course he could've just shot her like that guy on Oklahoma..........

T



tazzygirl -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 6:19:08 AM)

Which is why i said it required pa's grandmother to presecute.

Btw, T, that post you quoted was in response to pahunk's post about his grandparents, not in response to the OP.



plushiecat -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 4:12:42 PM)

Frankly I don't care whether or not you do. I just figure if you're going to pick on someone's misuse of a word, even though the meaning was quite clear, then you should see to it that your spelling is impeccable. Or, why not simply speak to the topic, and, if you disagree with someone, fine, but don't pick apart someone's misspellings.



tazzygirl -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 4:19:08 PM)

If it hadnt been pointed out to him before, no one would have made an issue. Try getting to know posters before stomping into a thread and deciding you know what you are speaking about.



tazzygirl -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 4:20:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Because he's more important than you are, and so you must respect him big time.
(It's one of the stock arguments from idiots on here, I've noticed.)


Obviously she feels she knows what is best for all of us concerned.

~shrugs




rulemylife -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 4:53:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

FR FFS

"or to pry into the business or secrets of another, "

This is not another under the law. The same law that prevents the prosecution from compelling her to testify against him makes this point nulll and void. And being email, even if he deleted it, she could retrieve it, which means he did not obstruct it's delivery in any significant way.

Of course he could've just shot her like that guy on Oklahoma..........

T


I'm assuming this was in reply to me since you quoted a portion of the code that I posted.

If so, then you must realize I was referring directly to Pahunk's contention that married couples can legally open each others regular mail. 

I was not commenting on the e-mail issue.





plushiecat -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 5:07:23 PM)

So what if it had? The point is, it never needed to be made an issue of. Obviously your grammar/spelling isn't perfect, so who are you to go and rip on another's?



tazzygirl -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (12/30/2010 7:47:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: plushiecat

So what if it had? The point is, it never needed to be made an issue of. Obviously your grammar/spelling isn't perfect, so who are you to go and rip on another's?


And who are you to tell me what i can or cant rip on? Annoying twat who doesnt know fuck all about anything here.

There is a huge difference between moot and mute, but i would not expect you to understand that.

As i said before, you dont know the posters. You dont know our interactions, and if you believe any of us give a fuck about what you think... then you really need to go back to the "kinder and gentler" boards.



plushiecat -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (1/1/2011 6:50:24 AM)

There is also quite a difference between "Its" and "It's", but I am quite aware someone like you would be unable to realise such a thing. I don't need to know the posters to know that it's only when someone has nothing of actual importance to say in response it's (See? The contraction of 'it is) then when they decide to pick on the grammar or choice of words, though they know full well what is meant. And, you seem to think I 'give a fuck' what you seem to think.



tazzygirl -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (1/1/2011 6:55:04 AM)

Sorry sweet cheeks. I just cant be bothered to give a fuck what you think.

But, do have a great new year!



plushiecat -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (1/1/2011 7:39:39 AM)

Oh I intend to. Just try to keep in mind that I couldn't care less of what your so-called views are either.



tazzygirl -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (1/1/2011 8:20:00 AM)

And yet you keep posting way off topic. Seems you care more than you are willing to admit. [;)]


Topic... Wife's emails... husband charged... family pc... affair with abusive ex husband... child at risk.

If you cant post on topic, dont post.



FirmhandKY -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (1/1/2011 11:13:17 AM)

FR:

Damn, ladies ... rough way to start out a new year, don'tja think?

Peace, love and patience?

Firm



tazzygirl -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (1/1/2011 11:14:44 AM)

Call it one of my New year resolutions. [:D]



plushiecat -> RE: Shared PC and Emails (1/1/2011 1:23:20 PM)

And you keep right on responding. It seems you do as well. Why not follow your own advice? Pointing out someone's misuse of a word is hardly on-topic now, is it?



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875