AAkasha -> RE: When a sub says "No" (12/31/2010 1:04:40 AM)
|
Being told "no" when I am at the height of a femdom "hunger" can be worse than getting interrupted right on the verge of orgasm and left hanging there indefinitely. I learned a long time ago how to deal with it, and I used to be pretty thorough with men explaining to them, during "down time," that "no" is not something I deal well with when I am in full predatory mode. I would never make a man do anything against his will; but something about resistance, something about suffering, something about surrender just pushes all my buttons. So, "well, not tonight, I just don't feel up for it...." sets off all my excitement bells. This is far different from a man with the flu (who I will want to nurture and take care of), or someone who is emotionally sad (learned of a tragedy, for example), etc -- all my typical female nurturing instincts kick right in. But, "I just don't feel UP for it..." -- oh yeah, that would get me into serious trouble. I had a very, very intense fling over a period of many years with a man who told me that submission and bottoming was very draining for him, and he had to be in the right frame of mind. If I was feeling ravenous and he just wasn't "in the mood" we'd butt heads. If I am in a serious predatory mood, I try seduction, sex, coercion if I think there's a chance I can break him down. These mind games and drama are potentially toxic, and I developed a very straightforward wait to deal with it by avoiding it entirely. While I don't typically use "safewords" in play, I sometimes developed code phrases or language so that I knew when my man really, honestly was not up for it, but there were rules he had to follow. First, he had to recognize that saying no to me in that mood was honestly very difficult for me to deal with. Second, he had to immediately tell me *when* he would be up for it, so I could shift my focus into planning -- ie, in a few days? In a week? Indefinite? If I have a time frame, I can focus on that. Next, he had to be prepared to be romantically, sensually, emotionally available -- this is all assuming the "not up for play" thing isn't related to illness or tragedy, but just not in the mood. If he isn't going to suffer for me, he's going to have to offer up, possibly, some serious cuddling, orgasms or a backrub, should my sadistic streak feel like a little attention as an alternative. Finally, he had to be open to me having other partners if he was going to be regularly not available. I have a sadistic side that needs to get out and be expressed from time to time - and so if he can't fulfill that, we'd need to find some other solutions. I wrote a long article on this about fifteen years ago and now I can't find it. I think it might be "care and feeding of femdoms" or something. To be honest, most sub men I have known don't have a problem finding the energy to submit at the drop of a hat or even in the face of unrealistic femdom demands. I dated a lot of "vanilla converts" and "kink curious" men though who were game for a healthy dose of BDSM, but never quite at the frequency or intensity that I needed. There are the occasional subs though that really have to reach a place emotionally to surrender, and they can be a bit moody about when they are up for BDSM because they have to be mentally prepared. That's good stuff. I did point out early on in this post, but to clarify again, I am talking about when a man says "I just am not in the mood," which is far different from "I'm sick today," or "I am hurting," which shut down my femdom lusts pretty squarely and put me right into a mode of nurturing. Akasha
|
|
|
|