RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


PeonForHer -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 10:03:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Also the tories who are in government plan to sell off the English forests  which are reckoned to be worth £761 million


My first thought when I heard about this:  for how long are they still going to have the effrontery to keep their current 'green tree' logo?  Bloody astonishing.




RapierFugue -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 10:18:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
US cops carry guns.  Last I heard, British ones don't.  Assuming that simply the uniform will get enough respect that a gun isn't needed.

The impression I get is that overall, the British tend to follow laws and assume others do as well. We Americans are more prone to think of those that break the rules.


Bit late to this thread, and haven't read the rest, but ...

Yes ... and yet and at the same time ... no.

The exact wording is that “police in England, Scotland and Wales (NI has its own foibles, for reasons I'm sure you can imagine) aren’t routinely armed.
In urban areas there are a large number of “Tactical” units, typically (for large cities like, say, London, Manchester and Liverpool) 10-12 per shift, by Force Area (not 10-12 per Station Area). Each “Tactical” comprises a high-speed car, at least one driver trained to Police Class One (their “pursuit” license, i.e. a highly trained speed driver) and one (or both) will be firearms licensed (typically both). In the boot there is a small arsenal, comprising several handguns (nominally 3 in case of malfunctions, sometimes more), and whatever is that force area’s load-out of higher-powered weaponry. In the Met (London) area, this means 2 x Heckler-Koch MP5s, but in a curiously British twist these HKs are set for semi-auto fire only. In more rural areas there will be fewer Tactical units, but they’re there – this all followed the Hungerford massacre, so that no area of major interest (i.e. not the wilds of Scotland or Wales, for example) is supposed to be more than 20 minutes from Tactical support.

What this means in practice is that, if a crime is committed where a firearm is used, or one in which one is believed to have been used, or threatened to be used, then in a matter of minutes several “Tactical” units will converge on the location, typically controlled via the Met’s main Helicopter Support Unit (has IR cameras, recording devices, etc). If the situation escalates (or looks like it might) then the HSU and/or CAD Room have the authority to call in the central firearms unit, who will turn up in numbers and deploy as required.

So, if you commit a gun crime, the chances are you’ll be staring down the barrel of something unpleasant in a very short period of time, typically 5 minutes or less.

As a nation I don't consider us any more lawful or respectful of the police than the US, especially as public confidence in, and support of, the police is at an all-time low in most major urban areas.

Oh and in most cities of the UK illegal guns are fairly easy to obtain - witness the recent shootings in London by youngsters enforcing their "turf". The thing is though that even possession, let alone use of, an illegal firearm carries a substantial prison sentence, so these idiots usually shoot one of their own kind, then get locked up for a prolonged period of time. This is what I believe is termed "win-win".




Aneirin -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 10:47:14 AM)

quote:

but in a curiously British twist these HKs are set for semi-auto fire only
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
US cops carry guns.  Last I heard, British ones don't.  Assuming that simply the uniform will get enough respect that a gun isn't needed.

The impression I get is that overall, the British tend to follow laws and assume others do as well. We Americans are more prone to think of those that break the rules.


Bit late to this thread, and haven't read the rest, but ...

Yes ... and yet and at the same time ... no.

The exact wording is that “police in England, Scotland and Wales (NI has its own foibles, for reasons I'm sure you can imagine) aren’t routinely armed.
In urban areas there are a large number of “Tactical” units, typically (for large cities like, say, London, Manchester and Liverpool) 10-12 per shift, by Force Area (not 10-12 per Station Area). Each “Tactical” comprises a high-speed car, at least one driver trained to Police Class One (their “pursuit” license, i.e. a highly trained speed driver) and one (or both) will be firearms licensed (typically both). In the boot there is a small arsenal, comprising several handguns (nominally 3 in case of malfunctions, sometimes more), and whatever is that force area’s load-out of higher-powered weaponry. In the Met (London) area, this means 2 x Heckler-Koch MP5s, but in a curiously British twist these HKs are set for semi-auto fire only. In more rural areas there will be fewer Tactical units, but they’re there – this all followed the Hungerford massacre, so that no area of major interest (i.e. not the wilds of Scotland or Wales, for example) is supposed to be more than 20 minutes from Tactical support.

What this means in practice is that, if a crime is committed where a firearm is used, or one in which one is believed to have been used, or threatened to be used, then in a matter of minutes several “Tactical” units will converge on the location, typically controlled via the Met’s main Helicopter Support Unit (has IR cameras, recording devices, etc). If the situation escalates (or looks like it might) then the HSU and/or CAD Room have the authority to call in the central firearms unit, who will turn up in numbers and deploy as required.

So, if you commit a gun crime, the chances are you’ll be staring down the barrel of something unpleasant in a very short period of time, typically 5 minutes or less.

As a nation I don't consider us any more lawful or respectful of the police than the US, especially as public confidence in, and support of, the police is at an all-time low in most major urban areas.

Oh and in most cities of the UK illegal guns are fairly easy to obtain - witness the recent shootings in London by youngsters enforcing their "turf". The thing is though that even possession, let alone use of, an illegal firearm carries a substantial prison sentence, so these idiots usually shoot one of their own kind, then get locked up for a prolonged period of time. This is what I believe is termed "win-win".



Just out of interest, the armed forces rifles, the SA80 are also set up for semi auto fire although they are capable of fully auto. Same with the older rhino guns, the L1A1 SLR, FN FAL the safety catch on the thing had been modified so the weapon cannot be flicked into automatic, to do that, the gun had to be broken the catch flicked over and the gun closed again. Iguess it is to stop our lot becoming trigger happy and wasting HM governments ammo.




pahunkboy -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 11:07:25 AM)

Consider too- how prevalent that drones are.  It goes with CCTV, sound cannons and tasers. 




RapierFugue -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 11:22:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin
Just out of interest, the armed forces rifles, the SA80 are also set up for semi auto fire although they are capable of fully auto. Same with the older rhino guns, the L1A1 SLR, FN FAL the safety catch on the thing had been modified so the weapon cannot be flicked into automatic, to do that, the gun had to be broken the catch flicked over and the gun closed again.

Sort of. It can't be "directly" flicked to full auto, but the latest versions of the SA80 (L85/SA80/A2) do indeed "prevent" full auto as delivered ... but to "un-prevent" it is the work of about 10 seconds.

So what additional, 10-second procedure do you think our chaps have added to their "prep for patrol" lists? (if they're expecting a punch-up) And quite right too - if some sod's shooting at me I'd want to shove as much metal back their way as humanly possible.

The original SA80 had a slightly different "safety" system ... in that it usually jammed within the first few rounds, thus keeping the enemy nice and safe ;)




kdsub -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 12:29:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonspinkkitty

All one has to do it research the crime statics to find out that Britain has a higher crime percentage than the US does.

Taking away guns does not stop crime. In fact it lets it increase by preventing law abiding citizens from protecting themselves and each other against violent criminals.



So why are more people murdered in the US than in the UK, or am I missing something here ?


So you agree that the people of the UK are just as violent as those in the US...and only gun laws make the difference....So why not attack the reasons for this violance rather then the ownership of guns?

Butch




Moonhead -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 12:35:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aneirin

Also the tories who are in government plan to sell off the English forests  which are reckoned to be worth £761 million
and that is only 30 % of the forested land in England that are under governmental or local authority control. The other 70% of the forested land is in private ownership and with any luck, I will have a bit in the future.



Well, they've run out of public services that they can sell to the public sector in order to raise the cash to bribe the electorate with tax cuts before the next election, haven't they? They have to find something to sell.




peacefulplace -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 2:57:19 PM)

~FR~

Sorry, but I have anecdotal evidence only.

Among the people I know here in the U.S., gun owners or not, I'd have to say the majority of us secretly like to think of ourselves as bad asses. Yes, even me--deep down, I'm a total bad ass! [:)] Does it make any one of us less likely to be law abiding? I believe that it certainly could contribute to that.

I do not know enough British people to know whether they, too, secretly think they will knock the sh** out of you if they have to, but I will say the general atmosphere has seemed a bit calmer in Great Britian on the occasions I've had to visit. However, like agirl wrote, the comparisons are so difficult and uneven to make that perhaps we shouldn't bother. Really, what do I know of a culture from visiting it 3 or 4 times?

Here's what I wonder though: I own a pink rifle. I wonder if everyone would be so quick to buy a gun if it were flourescent pink.




RapierFugue -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 3:08:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonspinkkitty
Taking away guns does not stop crime.

Maybe not, but it severely reduces gun crime. There's only so much damage someone can do with a knife.

Look at the statistics, and the vastly higher numbers of people dying from GSW in the US compared to the UK. And I mean per capita.




Politesub53 -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 3:12:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonspinkkitty

All one has to do it research the crime statics to find out that Britain has a higher crime percentage than the US does.

Taking away guns does not stop crime. In fact it lets it increase by preventing law abiding citizens from protecting themselves and each other against violent criminals.



So why are more people murdered in the US than in the UK, or am I missing something here ?


So you agree that the people of the UK are just as violent as those in the US...and only gun laws make the difference....So why not attack the reasons for this violance rather then the ownership of guns?

Butch


I know reading isnt your strong point Butch but do try and keep up old chap.

1) pinkkitty stated guns stop crimes.
2) I said that if that is the case why are more people murdered in the US than the UK
3) You jumped in and came to your own conclusion, non of which had anything to do with my post.







Politesub53 -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 3:17:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

Well, they've run out of public services that they can sell to the public sector in order to raise the cash to bribe the electorate with tax cuts before the next election, haven't they? They have to find something to sell.


Brown sold of just about anything else, including the family silver as I recall.

As one prominent Labout MP put it, "More jobs were privatised under New Labour than under Thatcher."




rfd1 -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 3:19:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

The brilliant Marvin Harris, one of the world's most noted anthropologists, explained why America has had high violent crime rates compared to UK and Japan, in his seminal work:
America Now: The Anthropology of a Changing Culture. New York: Simon & Schuster. It is all BLUNTLY reported in the chapter: Why There's Terror on the Streets

Professor Harris documented the disparities in a most politically incorrect example of truth-telling.
To observe the social constraints of leftist politicizing of fact, I will merely note that Dr Harris' research revealed that White males, who overwhelmingly made up the gun-owning population, had LOWER violent crime rates, including homicide, than either the English in England or the Japanese in Japan.



Swiss has very liberal gun laws up until recently and had the lowest murder rate in the Western world.
I would think it is clear that demographics are the reason for high rates of violence.
As the US become a 3rd world, by heritage, nation it will be plainly obvious that Mexico's levels should appear here within 15 or so years. It has already started. For a sneak preview of America's future just visit Mexico or South Africa.




RapierFugue -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 3:22:43 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: rfd1
Swiss has very liberal gun laws up until recently and had the lowest murder rate in the Western world.

A popular myth.

http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-switzerland.htm




Charles6682 -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 4:07:47 PM)

I don't think its fair to compare America to a civilized nation like England.If anything,the USA has more in common with Iran and Afganistan!America is run by a bunch of religous weirdos who want to take over the world and force people to believe in "thier" God.Just like Iran.I mean,George Bush Jr would have made a great President in Iran.They have the same ideas,just a different religion.




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 4:11:00 PM)

Ahmadinejad is also quite a quirky character.




RapierFugue -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 4:18:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682
I don't think its fair to compare America to a civilized nation like England.If anything,the USA has more in common with Iran and Afganistan!America is run by a bunch of religous weirdos who want to take over the world and force people to believe in "thier" God.Just like Iran.I mean,George Bush Jr would have made a great President in Iran.They have the same ideas,just a different religion.

On the one hand, your posts are as moronic in content as ever. There's no truth in what you say about the UK (note UK, not "England") being inherently more "civilised" than the USA. None whatsoever. I can show you town centres in poorer parts of Britain on a Friday & Saturday night which resemble Sodom & Gomorrah, as just one example of many. I'm British and even I wouldn't claim my country is inherently any more "civilised" than the US. Cultural, possibly. Better at cricket, almost certainly (although you never know with the England team), but inherently more civilised? Tosh.

On the other, I note a refreshing lack of apostrophes in your post. Ok so there are now a few missing, but it's somehow less offensive to the eye than your usual technique of going "bippety boppety BACON!" and sprinkling them all around.

So, in summary, you're still an idiot, but a marginally less irritating one.

Well done you. Happy New Year and a gold star :)




PeonForHer -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 4:19:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

If anything,the USA has more in common with Iran  . . . .


Not in terms of gun ownership.  There were  5.3 guns per 100 residents in Iran in 2007, compared to 5.6 for UK residents and 90 for Americans.   Just saying. [;)]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_gun_ownership




willbeurdaddy -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 4:19:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dragonspinkkitty

All one has to do it research the crime statics to find out that Britain has a higher crime percentage than the US does.

Taking away guns does not stop crime. In fact it lets it increase by preventing law abiding citizens from protecting themselves and each other against violent criminals.



So why are more people murdered in the US than in the UK, or am I missing something here ?


So you agree that the people of the UK are just as violent as those in the US...and only gun laws make the difference....So why not attack the reasons for this violance rather then the ownership of guns?

Butch


I know reading isnt your strong point Butch but do try and keep up old chap.

1) pinkkitty stated guns stop crimes.
2) I said that if that is the case why are more people murdered in the US than the UK






Uhhhh, because murder isnt the only crime?




RapierFugue -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 4:23:12 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
As one prominent Labout MP put it, "More jobs were privatised under New Labour than under Thatcher."

"PFI is not the worker's friend".

I.e., despise her though I did, at least Thatcher called a spade a spade. She looked at stuff the nation owned, and said "we're flogging those fuckers off for cash ... and FFS keep Dennis away from the gin!".

As opposed to the NuLabour PFI frenzy, which is just privatisation by the back door*.

*in both senses of the word - "we've been anally penetrated, and not in the good way".




Charles6682 -> RE: Are the British more law abiding than Americans? (1/2/2011 4:31:01 PM)

Rapeher,I forgot.There are still a few morons in England.I forgot you were still around.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875