RE: Monopoly Hookers

RE: Monopoly Hookers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

SpiritedRadiance -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:02:22 AM)
Your one man in his 60s.... These are most likely men younger then you that can likely bring in a weapon with out your knowledge... If anything happens while in your home during this scenario, Guess what your going to jail........ No ifs... no ands no buts... your an accessory to the crime. In fact its worse because the entire thing is premeditated...... I have many people looking out for me when i go to an event, and im very cautious when i bring people into my home, but prior to that i meet them many times in public.... Your scenario isnt stating that... I can create a profile and poof im a 6'2 200 black man with a 12 inch dick, a simple program from the internet and i sound the part..... Im sorry to bring reality into your fantasy but having a woman come from a distance never meeting you or the people involved prior... theres no way you can guarantee safety... And for the record my issue isnt with the scene its self its with someone attempting to say because of his presence its completely safe and no harm can come of it.... Be insulted all you want, my point of bringing up serial killers is usually they are nice sweet guys that no one knows the difference about until the news hits the papers, your saying all the the men youve met and vetted personally....im saying that really doesnt account for much in the real world.... If someone was looking out for his first victim... 30 other women or more still would have died... because he was NON THREATENING as a person... He was charming and no one knew for a span of what 4 or more years he was killing people....

JOHN2289 -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:15:16 AM)
At SpiritedRadiance, You have made three posts. In each one you mention ted bundy. In each one you say I am going to prison. In each one you say I cannot guarantee safety. We have all noted your comments, three times. So, thank you thank you thank you

SpiritedRadiance -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:20:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JOHN2289 At SpiritedRadiance, You have made three posts. In each one you mention ted bundy. In each one you say I am going to prison. In each one you say I cannot guarantee safety. We have all noted your comments, three times. So, thank you thank you thank you John, I made one post about my opinion, I made one post in attempt to clarify my post to another user....Then i made another post to try to clarify to you.... If you dont want me to say things over and over, try not asking for clarifications of those facts in your posts by quoting me.....

JOHN2289 -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:22:31 AM)
Thank you

DarkSteven -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:23:37 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JOHN2289 At SpiritedRadiance, You have made three posts. In each one you mention ted bundy. In each one you say I am going to prison. In each one you say I cannot guarantee safety. We have all noted your comments, three times. So, thank you thank you thank you Who's the "we", John? I've spent some time chatting with SR on the phone. I can vouch for her - she's a smart, level headed lady, especially for someone so young. Edited to add: I'm not quite certain what you're insinuating here, John. If it's that she's a wacko, I disagree. I see it as her simply pointing out some problems you might face.

SpiritedRadiance -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:32:46 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven Who's the "we", John? I've spent some time chatting with SR on the phone. I can vouch for her - she's a smart, level headed lady, especially for someone so young. Aww DS you make me blush...

JOHN2289 -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:33:32 AM)
quote: I can vouch for her I accept what you say, and it is good that you can vouch for your friends. Apparently, however, I am not allowed to.

DarkSteven -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:38:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: JOHN2289 quote: I can vouch for her I accept what you say, and it is good that you can vouch for your friends. Apparently, however, I am not allowed to. Quit whining about how things aren't fair here. SR and I have both been on for years, and people know us. If you stick around, you will be able to say the same after a while. You honestly can't expect everyone to be treated the same with or without a track record. If it makes you feel any better, your lack of a track record is a plus compared with several longterm posters.

SpiritedRadiance -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:40:35 AM)
quote: I accept what you say, and it is good that you can vouch for your friends. Apparently, however, I am not allowed to. Vouching for one online that states hey this person knows the rules of the forum.... is a lot different then assuring someone that the people fucking them are going to be safe sane and disease free...

salemartist -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:43:01 AM)
I can vouch for the monopoly man, the the dog , the car and the thimble. they have never donre me harm and I feel completely safe around them. I would feel the same for John IF he had the tophat, but clearly he is not to be trusted without it. This senerio is fun, but its doubtful that any sub women will put themselves in this position. Be sure to take photos of the 'hookers' with their monopoly loot in a future episode

salemartist -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:49:25 AM)
hehehe [image]local://upfiles/1127666/FCC67C3265D84BA19A509ED7BE27B0BA.jpg[/image]

JOHN2289 -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:52:25 AM)
quote: You honestly can't expect everyone to be treated the same with or without a track record. Yes I do. I am not a horse. And I don't expect treatment of any kind, whether fair or otherwise. My post was to indicate how the argument fails. One person can vouch for another, and it is up to the individual to decide whether to accept that statement. There is no hierarchy involved in the protocols of posting. You being on this site longer than me does not give you the right to comment on my track record. It would be as silly as me saying that because I am six years older than you, you should respect your elders. Now I am happy to discuss the topic, and to continue to seek your advice. As well as those for whom you vouch. But going back to the racetrack analogy, there is no need to nag. John

JOHN2289 -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:57:50 AM)
quote: Be sure to take photos of the 'hookers' with their monopoly loot in a future episode Sorry, no cameras allowed, remember? And I love the picture!!

LadyPact -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 7:02:04 AM)
Helpful tip. I don't know if they have the equivalent in Australia, but here in the States, you can get fake money that's already printed up from a party supply store. Let the guys who are coming over to be 'customers' go out an buy it. Problem solved with ruining the board game. If you've got folks willing to do this, OP....... Great! Have a party! Personally, I wouldn't risk My home address over such a thing (or My personal safety) but that's entirely your call. I happen to be funky about not allowing people into My home that I've never met before. A few email exchanges isn't quite enough for Me to have that level of trust in folks, but if you're satisfied that these are people that won't screw you over, enjoy yourself.

JOHN2289 -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 7:18:31 AM)
quote: Let the guys who are coming over to be 'customers' go out an buy it. Great tip, but one small complication. Payment for prostitution can be either cash or goods or services. So even giving her fake money with a low intrinsic value can be enough to excuse an investigation. So my solution was ... Sell her 100 pieces of paper which happen to be monopoly denominations (or printed fakes) for one dollar. That is one cent per piece of paper. She then lends the notes to me, and I share them with the visitors. They then pay her WITH HER OWN MONEY. No value has been exchanged. A bit silly, I know. But think how silly a copper will look trying to explain what happened to a jury. And thanks for the kind advice. John John2289 on Collarme sadistic_prick on Fetlife

RapierFugue -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 7:29:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: salemartist My sarcastic side would like to make a few points now: 1) your ruining a perfectly good board game, with no cash the game is useless 2) Parker Bros. in no way condones the use of their play money as payment for goods or services 3) you would pull off the monoply man look much better with a nice top hat (everybody knows the hat makes the man) lol. You don't think the old boot would be more like it? :) BTW, while not actually giving a fuck what people choose to do with their lives, I can't help thinking that a 60 year-old's abilities to stop things, should they get out of hand, is going to be on par with trying to stop a truck with a square of kitchen paper. <thinks> Unless he's raiding the local old folk's home for participants ... Funny thread though :)

LadyPact -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 7:34:34 AM)
That's something that I haven't had to worry about in My experiences. If you've got people that you trust enough to be in your house, you shouldn't have the issue of cops anyway. Same tip still applies. Have her go to the party store and get the play money. After all of the fake money that I had to print for the slave auctions, you can take Me word for it. The endeavor is time consuming and can be a royal pain. Of course, I probably had a greater demand for the amount of fake bills that I needed. Just that part of preparing for the event was a lot of work.

chiaThePet -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 7:42:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote: ORIGINAL: chiaThePet quote: ORIGINAL: JOHN2289 Ever had that fantasy where you are a hooker for a few days, being used by a number of men just as meat for their entertainment, having a pimp who takes half your money and treats you just like a whore? Why yes, I call it "Wednesday through Friday at my Ford Dealership Service and Maintenance Department." <fx: narrowly avoids coffee/keyboard interface situation> Happy New Year, chia :) Happy New Year to you too. (Throws noisemaker up into the air then tends to her wounds when she hits the ground) chia* (the pet)

RapierFugue -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 7:44:28 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: chiaThePet (Throws noisemaker up into the air then tends to her wounds when she hits the ground) Tora! Tora! Tora!

JOHN2289 -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 7:49:09 AM)
Thank you all for your comments. It is just after 2am on Wednesday, Adelaide local time and us old codgers have to get to sleep. I can hear some screams from the spare room, but I'm pretty sure it's the tv. I really do value your comments, so feel free to continue posting. I shall read them in the morning once I put my glasses on and find my walking frame. lol

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3] 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.711914E-02