RE: Monopoly Hookers (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


RapierFugue -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 7:55:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: JOHN2289

Thank you all for your comments.
It is just after 2am on Wednesday, Adelaide local time and us old codgers have to get to sleep.
I can hear some screams from the spare room, but I'm pretty sure it's the tv.

I really do value your comments, so feel free to continue posting.  I shall read them in the morning once I put my glasses on and find my walking frame. lol

No worries man, we're happy to help.

I SAID, WE'RE HAPPY TO HELP! YES!




poise -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 8:04:07 AM)

Anyone up for a game of Naked Twister?


left hand orange



right leg red



[image]local://upfiles/1031783/0081288E62DB485F97D99D09BF7F942F.jpg[/image]




allthatjaz -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 8:27:08 AM)

Is there something I'm missing here.
Stephen, I have a lot of respect for you but I don't see what having been here for years has to do with anything. I don't get what this badge of honor or trophy of respect is all about because for each and everyone of us that hasn't met and got to know in person, its meaningless.

Does it really matter how long we have been on here? how many posts we have done or how well we are accepted on this site? The reality is, every bit of it could be a sham. Oh I could get people to vouch that I'm a real woman. I could even get people to vouch that I am a respected and known member of the UK scene but none of them really know me well enough to make promises that I don't have bodies buried in my back garden.

There was a guy that came on here recently and made a polite and comprehensive correction on one of the bondage threads. Now I happen to know that this guy is as well known and respected out their on the BDSM scene as Midori. The posts that followed were condescending, patronizing and darn right vindictive and it was all based on him being a newbie! He didn't even give them the satisfaction of a reply but just disappeared back into the BDSM scene that loves and respects him. He could of been an informative bondage mentor on here as he is on another site but the CM crowd wouldn't give him a chance.
What people have to realize is, a newbie to this site doesn't mean a newbie to BDSM. A regular and respected board member on CM could be a dangerous psychopath in rl and someone new to the boards could be an upstanding member of the BDSM scene.




LadyConstanze -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 8:52:27 AM)

Right, now what I don't get is why it should be in some private home? Admittedly I am damned picky about who I have sex with and the whole idea of feeling like a prostitute or having sex with several guys (with or without monopoly money) just doesn't appeal, but if somebody is into that, why would they not simply go to a swinger club?




RCdc -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 8:53:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: JOHN2289

quote:

I can vouch for her


I accept what you say, and it is good that you can vouch for your friends.
Apparently, however, I am not allowed to.



Quit whining about how things aren't fair here.  SR and I have both been on for years, and people know us.  If you stick around, you will be able to say the same after a while.  You honestly can't expect everyone to be treated the same with or without a track record.  If it makes you feel any better, your lack of a track record is a plus compared with several longterm posters. 



With all due respect Steven, a track record on a free BDSM site?  Regardless who you have met and who you think you can vouch for - honestly means nothing.  As many people as we have met off here, we wouldn't vouch for them, nor expect the reverse.




LadyPact -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 8:55:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: allthatjaz

Is there something I'm missing here.
Stephen, I have a lot of respect for you but I don't see what having been here for years has to do with anything. I don't get what this badge of honor or trophy of respect is all about because for each and everyone of us that hasn't met and got to know in person, its meaningless.

Does it really matter how long we have been on here? how many posts we have done or how well we are accepted on this site? The reality is, every bit of it could be a sham. Oh I could get people to vouch that I'm a real woman. I could even get people to vouch that I am a respected and known member of the UK scene but none of them really know me well enough to make promises that I don't have bodies buried in my back garden.

There was a guy that came on here recently and made a polite and comprehensive correction on one of the bondage threads. Now I happen to know that this guy is as well known and respected out their on the BDSM scene as Midori. The posts that followed were condescending, patronizing and darn right vindictive and it was all based on him being a newbie! He didn't even give them the satisfaction of a reply but just disappeared back into the BDSM scene that loves and respects him. He could of been an informative bondage mentor on here as he is on another site but the CM crowd wouldn't give him a chance.
What people have to realize is, a newbie to this site doesn't mean a newbie to BDSM. A regular and respected board member on CM could be a dangerous psychopath in rl and someone new to the boards could be an upstanding member of the BDSM scene.

That's not entirely true.  Even though he doesn't post that much, doesn't your other half have an account?  I'm thinking that he'd know if you have bodies in the back yard.  [8D]

Just lightening the mood a bit.




allthatjaz -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 9:39:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

That's not entirely true.  Even though he doesn't post that much, doesn't your other half have an account?  I'm thinking that he'd know if you have bodies in the back yard.  [8D]

Just lightening the mood a bit.



Maybe that's our little secret [8D]

Yep I'm going to lighten up now. Thanks for the kick LadyP!




JOHN2289 -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/4/2011 6:08:47 PM)

To LadyConstanze,

quote:

Right, now what I don't get is why it should be in some private home? Admittedly I am damned picky about who I have sex with and the whole idea of feeling like a prostitute or having sex with several guys (with or without monopoly money) just doesn't appeal, but if somebody is into that, why would they not simply go to a swinger club?


I am sure that many DO go to swinger clubs.  And some may be recognised there by other friends, or may have a local guy stalk them afterwards, or may just want to avoid some guy from the previous meeting who was a boring lay.  And in any case being a fantasy hooker implies multiple paid hookups in one day (or night), and not just meeting and screwing.  The people who run such clubs, even in private homes, might be concerned about their premises being used for prostitution, even fantasy prostitution.

Part of the nature of prostitution is that the hooker is not 'damned picky'.  And you are right, the idea does not appeal to everyone at all.  But it does to some.

Okay, they come from interstate for a reason.  When they go back home they can keep that fantasy a secret from other kinksters in their home state.  That is another part of being a hooker -- hiding it from your friends.  Also the framed monopoly money hanging on their wall adds a bit of memory for them, and some interesting explanations which they can invent.

Now, about the private home.  My friends respect my home, and my authority while in it.  They have been here many times, and a number have already enjoyed the company of women in my spare room (one at a time --no gangbangs). The concept has been refined through discussions with women, some who have participated in the opening stages.  And the idea of having a pimp is based on two things.  First, many hookers (not all) have a pimp.  Second, it is a way to provide a level of safety by having it in my private home.  Also, I live alone, very happily so.  And when the clients go home the pimp then has HIS turn.  It is not 100% altruism.

And I try to restrict this to one fantasy per month.  Old guys like me need time to rest between these visits. lol

So there you have it.  Those who go to swinger bars are not (by my definition) hookers.  Those who have a pimp and spend days full-time at it are (by my definition) hookers. And those who come interstate, spend a week at my house, service many of my friends, and me, are (by my definition) very nice ladies who are enjoying a fantasy and allowing me to enter it as well.

And again, thanks for the intelligent questions.




ranja -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 6:47:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue

I can't help thinking that a 60 year-old's abilities to stop things, should they get out of hand, is going to be on par with trying to stop a truck with a square of kitchen paper.



I think: if you're gonna be a total weed at sixty, well... thats your personal problem to look forward to, i happen to know quite a few over sixties who run rings around the young




RapierFugue -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 6:51:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue

I can't help thinking that a 60 year-old's abilities to stop things, should they get out of hand, is going to be on par with trying to stop a truck with a square of kitchen paper.



I think: if you're gonna be a total weed at sixty, well... thats your personal problem to look forward to, i happen to know quite a few over sixties who run rings around the young

Outnumbered, and giving away 20+ years on everyone else? Recipe for disaster. IMHO of course.




chiaThePet -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 6:54:24 AM)


Well I suppose it's better than Bimbo Bingo.

I-25.............

YAHTZEE!!!

And we have a winner.

chia* (the pet)




RapierFugue -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 6:56:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: chiaThePet
Well I suppose it's better than Bimbo Bingo.

That’s made me think of a new game ... "TwattleShips" ... I'll work the rules out later.




LadyConstanze -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 7:00:17 AM)

quote:


Part of the nature of prostitution is that the hooker is not 'damned picky'. And you are right, the idea does not appeal to everyone at all. But it does to some.


Alright, but you said she gives approval to every guy first due to legal reasons, so that would would negate the hooker feeling anyway, so that's why I thought it doesn't make much of a difference to the swinger club with multiple lays there...




ranja -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 7:02:08 AM)

it seems to me that the punter is outnumbered by the *pimp* and *hooker*
i do not get the idea that we are talking about gang bangs, but rather one on one at a reasonable steady pace AND the punters are vetted by the *pimp* beforehand, so possibly older or smaller or dumber than him?

i think it is a very nice game and if my geriatric Husband would come up with this scenario i would be well pleased... He could keep all the monopoly money for Himself and pay me in kind too




RapierFugue -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 7:05:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja

it seems to me that the punter is outnumbered by the *pimp* and *hooker*
i do not get the idea that we are talking about gang bangs, but rather one on one at a reasonable steady pace AND the punters are vetted by the *pimp* beforehand, so possibly older or smaller or dumber than him?

Ah, ok, I missed that. In that case I suppose he could whack the john with a Zimmerframe and it'd be game over. No risk at all then. Super.




ranja -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 7:09:48 AM)

hahahaha... i should think so!

most men are quite vulnerable with their pants around their ankles and their dick hanging out especially old weak and dumb ones... the perfect punters




RapierFugue -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 7:12:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ranja
most men are quite vulnerable with their pants around their ankles and their dick hanging out especially old weak and dumb ones... the perfect punters

A fair point. For most I should imagine simply pointing and laughing would do the trick. I know I'd weep* ;)

*"weep" as in cry, not "weep" as in ... actually, let’s not think about that.




SpiritedRadiance -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 7:12:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JOHN2289
Part of the nature of prostitution is that the hooker is not 'damned picky'.  And you are right, the idea does not appeal to everyone at all.  But it does to some.



Actually a lot of "hookers" are damned picky, aside from the ones who are street walkers, here in america a call girl can make upwards to a few thousand dollars on one or two men,

They are picky people who only service men who fit their standards.... Rather intelligent women too I might add...

So If you would please stop insulting ALL hookers it would be greatly appreciated...




RapierFugue -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 7:13:46 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: SpiritedRadiance
So If you would please stop insulting ALL hookers it would be greatly appreciated...

Insulting hookers is wrong now? When did that happen? Did I miss a vote? :)




SpiritedRadiance -> RE: Monopoly Hookers (1/5/2011 7:15:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue
Insulting hookers is wrong now? When did that happen? Did I miss a vote? :)


Implying hookers will fuck just anyone at anytime anywhere isnt correct there for insulting....







Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875