RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Moonhead -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 6:44:43 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


would you feel better if I used the word monarch?  Comeback is but the monarch is only a figurehead
counter comeback is yeh well the monarch transferred interest into the crown (aristocracy club)
counter counter comeback is yah but the monarch has no power

counter counter counter comeback is bs the monarch has power through the crown and the monarch write bills and unless unlawful to a point they would be embarrassed they get passed.

ah nice talking with you!  LOL


I just thought I'd better check that you don't believe George III is still running the country. You don't seem to have noticed much else that's changed since the American revolution, after all, and this incessant talk about a nonexistant King made me wonder.




SL4V3M4YB3 -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 8:37:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: lazarus1983
He can sue all he wants. As long as he doesn't win.

People seem to win less when times are hard, I've noticed this. It comes down to a cost decision i.e. how much does it cost to fight the case versus how much does it cost to pay him off. In comparison veterans are still awaiting payments for being exposed to nuclear testing. If there were only five of them, like the ones wrongly held in Cuba, then they'd have got what they deserve. It isn't always about justice mostly it seems to be about strategic accounting.

That's the problem nobody does anything for principle anymore. When you think that you are on the side of right you should stick your neck out and stand by it.




pahunkboy -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 8:46:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


would you feel better if I used the word monarch?  Comeback is but the monarch is only a figurehead
counter comeback is yeh well the monarch transferred interest into the crown (aristocracy club)
counter counter comeback is yah but the monarch has no power

counter counter counter comeback is bs the monarch has power through the crown and the monarch write bills and unless unlawful to a point they would be embarrassed they get passed.

ah nice talking with you!  LOL


I just thought I'd better check that you don't believe George III is still running the country. You don't seem to have noticed much else that's changed since the American revolution, after all, and this incessant talk about a nonexistant King made me wonder.


It has EVERYTHING to do with monetary policy.

Today happens to be the 150 year anniversary 1st shots fired- civil war.

Leaving British rule was predominately over monetary policy- visa-vi a central bank.

Our Constitution is our road map.

We are not subjects- but a sovereign people.   (maybe)

//PS  after focusing on food- I bought a few more oz of silver this week. Yay for me.




Moonhead -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 8:58:30 AM)

When did I or your gimp mention monetary policy, sunshine?




Real0ne -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 10:27:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne


would you feel better if I used the word monarch?  Comeback is but the monarch is only a figurehead
counter comeback is yeh well the monarch transferred interest into the crown (aristocracy club)
counter counter comeback is yah but the monarch has no power

counter counter counter comeback is bs the monarch has power through the crown and the monarch write bills and unless unlawful to a point they would be embarrassed they get passed.

ah nice talking with you!  LOL


I just thought I'd better check that you don't believe George III is still running the country. You don't seem to have noticed much else that's changed since the American revolution, after all, and this incessant talk about a nonexistant King made me wonder.


It has EVERYTHING to do with monetary policy.

Today happens to be the 150 year anniversary 1st shots fired- civil war.

Leaving British rule was predominately over monetary policy- visa-vi a central bank.

Our Constitution is our road map.

We are not subjects- but a sovereign people.   (maybe)

//PS  after focusing on food- I bought a few more oz of silver this week. Yay for me.




So called patriots have no clue of the fraud that has perpetrated upon them.

In law - in britain - freedom is when someone is institutionalized.

Its in their law books.

Now here is the kick in the teeth.

America and the rest of britains imperial empire is built on brit law.

They pretend law fades away but it never does.

Even my state constitution it says the ORIGINAL organic brit law is still in effect back to 1215!

So we come to america, claim we are free, turn to the law and find out we are institutionalized and have no remedy what so ever "in law".

Anyone can make the claim but try living it, you cant because you cannot prove it in law and if you do you will end up with the exact opposite, that you are in fact a slave!







Moonhead -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 11:39:03 AM)

If you uppity colonials are still living under Britannic law, doesn't that mean you owe us a couple of centuries worth of tea tax?




DarkSteven -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 11:40:44 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If you uppity colonials are still living under Britannic law, doesn't that mean you owe us a couple of centuries worth of tea tax?


C'mon over here and collect it.  Hah! Just TRY!  [sm=tongue.gif]




Moonhead -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 11:46:53 AM)

[:D]
I doubt anybody would be foolish enough to try, Steven. That was just the most obvious fallacy in R0's stance I could think of. I'm sure there's loads more for those who've studied constitutional law in more detail than I have.




DarkSteven -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 11:52:48 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

[:D]
I doubt anybody would be foolish enough to try, Steven. That was just the most obvious fallacy in R0's stance I could think of. I'm sure there's loads more for those who've studied constitutional law in more detail than I have.


You read his posts?




Moonhead -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 11:58:06 AM)

A good point, well made.




Charles6682 -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 12:58:21 PM)

We have a new Tea Party now!Forget about the old Tea Party!!Except this new Tea Party dosent really know what they are doing.Kind of clueless really.I know,they dont like Obama,Yea,they can all agree on that.Remember,he dosent look like the former Presidents on those dollar bills!!




Real0ne -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 1:07:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If you uppity colonials are still living under Britannic law, doesn't that mean you owe us a couple of centuries worth of tea tax?



what you do not understand here is that living under britanic law and living "directly" under the jurisdiction of britain are entirely different things.

However britain does as in the crown does get plenty of tax money because they bankrupted well more correctly put this country in severe debt in 1776 as a result of the revolutionary war that the king funded I might add and we never paid it off, went bankrupt when lincoln was in  and officially went bankrupt on book in 1933 as you can see in roosevelts declarations in like 4 EO's.

We pay interest to the crown HUGE interest on the fiat money, that is why every president that ever tried to put on gold or silver again was shot.

Here I will take that one step further to demonstrate the difference between a private education and your public school education.



we owed a debt to the king in 1776, as said above

now approx 70 years comes lincoln, unlawful reconstruct and unlawful 14th and amends thereafter

now approx 70 years later comes FDR

Now approx 70 years later comes 911

Oh my things are starting to look a bit simple arent they?

The only problem is that your public education never taught you what the tie in is so you have no clue what is significant about what I just said.

Anyone want to take a shot and go for the gold star?  Except hunk and T that is.  LOL






Real0ne -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 1:13:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If you uppity colonials are still living under Britannic law, doesn't that mean you owe us a couple of centuries worth of tea tax?


C'mon over here and collect it.  Hah! Just TRY!  [sm=tongue.gif]



its called interest now days not tea tax LOL

ever wonder why we "RENT" our money?  LOL




Real0ne -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 1:20:55 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

We have a new Tea Party now!Forget about the old Tea Party!!Except this new Tea Party dosent really know what they are doing.Kind of clueless really.I know,they dont like Obama,Yea,they can all agree on that.Remember,he dosent look like the former Presidents on those dollar bills!!


here again as usual stand on the old soap box and call names and as usual people who do this NEVER can make a substantial claim for their conclusions that goes right to the merits of the matter.

think of it like this.

If microsoft writes the manual of what can be done with your dos based OS it does not matter how many generations later or different clothes they put on it the body is still the same.

If there are no provisions for something in the body and that body is stil recognized as the basis for the law you are fucked plain and simple.

Just like land titles there is no basis for our version of land title, nor is there for freedom so read it and weep!

Peopl e like yourselves will continue calling the government idiots as they fuck you left and they fuck you right, while people like myself will sit back and chuckle because we have that eye to see saying just the opposite and how diabolically ingenious they are in how well they play the fools.

People like me tend to join them so we can cash in while you scoffers pay baby fucking pay!  LOL








Charles6682 -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 4:01:11 PM)

Your right Realone,I am so confused.Its those evil Illumanti,right?They are forming a world government to screw all of us.Its the right vs the left they love,so no one pays attention to them.Golly gee,we need to stop those people![8|]




Politesub53 -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 4:18:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

we owed a debt to the king in 1776, as said above



You keep quoting British law and despite me constantly asking for a link or two, have failed to produce any, not just recently but period. I wont hold my breath waiting for you to justify this, or the earlier comment (below)  about freedom in the UK.

"In law - in britain - freedom is when someone is institutionalized." << This is so stupid that only you could have posted it.




popeye1250 -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 5:51:19 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

pops why do you have to bring out the radical in me ? I actually have a hanging rope with two nooses attached, one is a thirteen loop. Somebody told it was illegal, so of course it is on display in my kitchen. Problem here is my fast car days are over. I haven't even had a V8 since about 1993. But the Jimmy has a Vortec and it will get rubber. Think it's fast enough ?

T


Term, I have a 3.7 litre v-6 vortec in the Lincoln and it goes like a bastard! Plenty fast enough to pull that blob in the picture around the block 2,000 times so he shucks 300 lbs!
The differance is that you or me might have a coffee and one or two blueberry or corn muffins for breakfast but that fat bastard wants to eat a dozen or two dozen muffins and blame someone else when he gets fat! How the fuck does that work?
The national health board "didn't do enough" to help him?
What if they locked him in a cell for three months and fed him 3 meals a day of 1,500 calories? Now *that* would be enough help and he'd probably look like a normal human being but he'd probably want to sue someone over that too. It's rediculous.




Hillwilliam -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 6:05:06 PM)

Last time the Brits messed with Tennesseeans. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-rNnIXJmZs&feature=related

Nuff said [8D][8D][8D][8D][8D][8D][8D]




pahunkboy -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/10/2011 9:47:36 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

If you uppity colonials are still living under Britannic law, doesn't that mean you owe us a couple of centuries worth of tea tax?


I agree.  We need to kick the monetarists Benedict Arnold s out of the US once and for all.   

We do not want your Maritime law, you UCC law, and most of all- we do not want your Napoleonic law.




pahunkboy -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/10/2011 9:49:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

Your right Realone,I am so confused.Its those evil Illumanti,right?They are forming a world government to screw all of us.Its the right vs the left they love,so no one pays attention to them.Golly gee,we need to stop those people![8|]


Too bad you are not as smart as you look.

You should be shovelling snow right now- because your last 20 posts have been a snow job.   An agent of turning the US over to the class system.  argh.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1396484