Real0ne -> RE: Another US vs UK comparison... (1/9/2011 10:27:30 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: pahunkboy quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonhead quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne would you feel better if I used the word monarch? Comeback is but the monarch is only a figurehead counter comeback is yeh well the monarch transferred interest into the crown (aristocracy club) counter counter comeback is yah but the monarch has no power counter counter counter comeback is bs the monarch has power through the crown and the monarch write bills and unless unlawful to a point they would be embarrassed they get passed. ah nice talking with you! LOL I just thought I'd better check that you don't believe George III is still running the country. You don't seem to have noticed much else that's changed since the American revolution, after all, and this incessant talk about a nonexistant King made me wonder. It has EVERYTHING to do with monetary policy. Today happens to be the 150 year anniversary 1st shots fired- civil war. Leaving British rule was predominately over monetary policy- visa-vi a central bank. Our Constitution is our road map. We are not subjects- but a sovereign people. (maybe) //PS after focusing on food- I bought a few more oz of silver this week. Yay for me. So called patriots have no clue of the fraud that has perpetrated upon them. In law - in britain - freedom is when someone is institutionalized. Its in their law books. Now here is the kick in the teeth. America and the rest of britains imperial empire is built on brit law. They pretend law fades away but it never does. Even my state constitution it says the ORIGINAL organic brit law is still in effect back to 1215! So we come to america, claim we are free, turn to the law and find out we are institutionalized and have no remedy what so ever "in law". Anyone can make the claim but try living it, you cant because you cannot prove it in law and if you do you will end up with the exact opposite, that you are in fact a slave!
|
|
|
|