Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 8:06:03 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell?

It should have been "women are not that dumb". The special irony comes in someone male describing how another gender are brighter, while proving the point themselves beyond all redemption, in just 5 words.

I realise that any joke you have to explain is by default never going to be funny to anyone else, but I could see exactly what lazarus was driving at :)



You are correct. I missed the "e". Well that was certainly worth calling him out on. I am sure you and lazarus have never made a typo before, maybe one day PA can be as perfect as you two are.



I think it was worth it considering the twenty insane posts a day we have to endure.

By the way, it's hard to make a typo when the other letter is on a different line of the keyboard.





< Message edited by rulemylife -- 1/14/2011 8:11:23 AM >

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 8:11:49 AM   
lazarus1983


Posts: 828
Joined: 2/25/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi

quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: thishereboi
Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git.

While agreeing with you in principle, I would point out that trying to educate people is often wasted effort, and only causes others to become sarcastic themselves. In PA's case, it's also completely wasted effort; he's batshit crazy, trolls for fun, and even repeated thumping of him with a clue-by-four isn't going to do it.

And it was a splendidly ironic fuck-up/typo :)



So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell? What part of the sentence was grammatically wrong? Now I have seen PA post some pretty strange shit that looked like it was proofread by a 3rd grader, but I don't understand why lazarus picked that particular post to comment on. Unless like I said before, he couldn't resist the chance to take a shot at PA. Believe it or not, some posters actually get some kind of twisted satisfaction out of belittling others. I suppose it makes them feel smarter in comparison. But enough of the hijack. I wouldn't want to get mod spanked.



So you get all up in arms about me 'attacking' pa by pointing out his hilarious typo. After which you promptly state that pa has written stuff before that was so bad it looked like it was 'proofread by a 3rd grader'. I guess you get some kind of twisted satisfaction out of belittling pa like that.

< Message edited by lazarus1983 -- 1/14/2011 8:12:51 AM >

_____________________________

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.

- Ayn Rand

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 8:15:27 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lazarus1983
So you get all up in arms about me 'attacking' pa by pointing out his hilarious typo. After which you promptly state that pa has written stuff before that was so bad it looked like it was 'proofread by a 3rd grader'. I guess you get some kind of twisted satisfaction out of belittling pa like that.

Rules Of Net Posting, Number 107: any post which mentions a typo, spelling or grammatical* error has a 95% chance of itself containing one ;)

*I didn't spell this word correctly the first time I wrote this post :)

(in reply to lazarus1983)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 8:23:21 AM   
lazarus1983


Posts: 828
Joined: 2/25/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RapierFugue


quote:

ORIGINAL: lazarus1983
So you get all up in arms about me 'attacking' pa by pointing out his hilarious typo. After which you promptly state that pa has written stuff before that was so bad it looked like it was 'proofread by a 3rd grader'. I guess you get some kind of twisted satisfaction out of belittling pa like that.

Rules Of Net Posting, Number 107: any post which mentions a typo, spelling or grammatical* error has a 95% chance of itself containing one ;)

*I didn't spell this word correctly the first time I wrote this post :)



Damn, you caught me before I edited it! Well that's what I get for using a tiny cell phone keyboard with my oversize hands.

_____________________________

The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.

- Ayn Rand

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 8:27:43 AM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lazarus1983
Damn, you caught me before I edited it!

lol - sorry! :)

Seriously though, I've proof-read such posts 10 times before now, and still made a mistake - I think there's some sort of fundamental* law at work :)

*In my dictionary, this is what you do when you give PA 10 bucks ;)

(in reply to lazarus1983)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 8:30:27 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Oh well.  I am sure it will bloe over.

(in reply to RapierFugue)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 8:48:51 AM   
TexasRogue


Posts: 30
Joined: 1/9/2011
Status: offline 		Women would probably do well in Armor units. Tanks are cramped quarters and women are, as a rule, smaller than men. For the same reason, they are at a decided disadvantage for the Infantry. As a former Forward Observer, I know exactly what kind of back-breaking labor is involved in being light Infantry. I typically carried between 100 and 150 lbs of gear when I climbed the mountains of Afghanistan. That's simply not something most women would be able to do. Hell, most men can't, w/out strenuous training. Admittedly, there are some women who could.

My biggest concern about women in combat units has nothing to do with their abilities, though. It's that there is frequently NO privacy. Your buddy guards your back while you take a dump on the side of a mountain. When we're piled together for warmth and someone sports wood in their sleep, as all men do, we just nudge the bastard off of us and call him gay good-naturedly...knowing we'll get the next nudge. What happens in that pile of bodies when one of them is a woman? We, as a society, are so litigious that I'm wary of women in combat for just that.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 9:17:53 AM   
hlen5


Posts: 5890
Joined: 3/2/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Oh well.  I am sure it will bloe over.




_____________________________



My fave Thread: http://www.collarchat.com/m_2626198/mpage_1/tm.htm

One time "Phallus Expert Extraordinaire"

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 9:56:36 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Oh well.  I am sure it will bloe over.


Still waiting on that appology you racist fucking pig.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 10:15:19 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jaybeee

This would be sweet. Watching the government trying and failing to fill 48.7% of front-line positions with women because most of them are too...what's that word? Oh yes, COWARDLY to fight.

When force must be applied, you don't run to Mummy's coat-tail's. You go straight to the Daddy.

I have a friend who teaches a woman's self defence course, would you be willing to serve as a target for an evening? Personally I think it would be hilarious but then again I wouldn't be the one being beat down for 4 hours. Although maybe that is your thing.

(in reply to Jaybeee)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 12:45:45 PM   
Jaybeee


Posts: 532
Joined: 2/2/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

There's prolly quite a few Dommes on this site who would delight in disputing your silly claim with you personally Jaybee


And I them. Few things in life sexier than breaking a 'strong' woman to my will.

Form an orderly queue, girls.



_____________________________

Mastery in motion since 2005

Women of the world, submit!

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 12:52:42 PM   
JstAnotherSub


Posts: 6174
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

By the way, it's hard to make a typo when the other letter is on a different line of the keyboard.



It aint as difficult as one would think.......

To the OP....When I was in the Army, the main reason stated for women not being in direct combat roles was men would stop to help them, due to their teachings before Uncle Sam got ahold of them. 

Even though that was a couple of decades ago, I think it probably holds true still in many ways.

Fuck, nearly three decades.............htf did that happen?

_____________________________

yep

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 12:54:07 PM   
Jaybeee


Posts: 532
Joined: 2/2/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen


quote:

ORIGINAL: Jaybeee

This would be sweet. Watching the government trying and failing to fill 48.7% of front-line positions with women because most of them are too...what's that word? Oh yes, COWARDLY to fight.

When force must be applied, you don't run to Mummy's coat-tail's. You go straight to the Daddy.

I have a friend who teaches a woman's self defence course, would you be willing to serve as a target for an evening? Personally I think it would be hilarious but then again I wouldn't be the one being beat down for 4 hours. Although maybe that is your thing.


As clever a businessman as he is for charging eye-candy top dollar for throwing their pretty lithe asses around, I don't think he could afford MY rates.

_____________________________

Mastery in motion since 2005

Women of the world, submit!

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 1:08:33 PM   
Sting360


Posts: 1
Joined: 12/18/2009
Status: offline 		Hey Texas, I kind of agree with you as far as the Armor Unit support, but then again from an equality perspective its about time females shared the burden of serving in the Armed Forces in numbers equal to men.
From a MRA standpoint we need to get rid of the notion that men are expendible.

We need to open the selective service (aka the Draft) to women as well. Right now only men are obligated by law to sign-up in for the selective service. Why is such a law still on the books in this age of enlightenment and equality for all?

I served in the Marines along side WM's and from my experience not all of them pulled their weight. I mean we are all the same right ? You need to get the job done. If you cant do it for whatever reason, you are out.

I'd help any Marine on the battlefield, but why give special treatment to an individual just because she has a vagina? We are all the same arent we? Marines, Soldiers, Sailors, etc...

(in reply to Jaybeee)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 1:28:39 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		If we are nuked tho- all the rules will be tossed out the window.

(in reply to Sting360)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 1:35:58 PM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline 		I have met some very tough girls.Girls that have easily beat up men.Girls that look just like your everyday neighbor.I wouldnt underestimate anyone!

_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 1:38:11 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jaybeee
When force must be applied, you don't run to Mummy's coat-tail's. You go straight to the Daddy.


Dude, you never met my Mom.

She once put a rifle slug about chest high in the middle of the front door when someone was trying to pick the lock.  When she heard a huge thump she called the police and told them she had just shot someone breaking into her house.

Seems he jumped when she shot and knocked over a huge potted plant.  The cops thought he was lucky to not be standing when she shot.

Trust me she would kick your ass.

(in reply to Jaybeee)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 1:42:27 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Charles6682

I have met some very tough girls.Girls that have easily beat up men.Girls that look just like your everyday neighbor.I wouldnt underestimate anyone!


Dont they have to be in shape to be in the service?

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 1:47:17 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline 		Ponder this. 

Being that they drug up the males- I wonder how they will drug up the ladies?

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms - 1/14/2011 1:47:33 PM   
RapierFugue


Posts: 4740
Joined: 3/16/2006
From: London, England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TexasRogue
For the same reason, they are at a decided disadvantage for the Infantry. As a former Forward Observer, I know exactly what kind of back-breaking labor is involved in being light Infantry. I typically carried between 100 and 150 lbs of gear when I climbed the mountains of Afghanistan. That's simply not something most women would be able to do. Hell, most men can't, w/out strenuous training.

My biggest concern about women in combat units has nothing to do with their abilities, though. It's that there is frequently NO privacy. Your buddy guards your back while you take a dump on the side of a mountain. When we're piled together for warmth and someone sports wood in their sleep, as all men do, we just nudge the bastard off of us and call him gay good-naturedly...knowing we'll get the next nudge. What happens in that pile of bodies when one of them is a woman? We, as a society, are so litigious that I'm wary of women in combat for just that.

So what we're after here is a group of very fit warrior-sluts?

Onerous as the duty is, I'm prepared to do the research :)

(in reply to TexasRogue)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094