Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms

Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

KenDckey -> Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/13/2011 5:10:54 PM)
http://www.military.com/news/article/army-mulls-women-in-combat-arms-units.html?ESRC=army-a.nl Bout time

pahunkboy -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/13/2011 5:22:26 PM)
Why? Woman are not that dumb.

servantforuse -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/13/2011 7:52:47 PM)
Let them fight one week of every month. Even the taliban won't mess with them.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/13/2011 8:03:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse Let them fight one week of every month. Even the taliban won't mess with them. Reminds Me of one of Larry the Cable Guy's jokes about women and gays in the military. "Use them as a team. First, send in the guys. If they get bogged down, send in a bunch of PMSing women. Then, when it's all over, send in the gays to redecorate."

hlen5 -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/13/2011 8:07:26 PM)
I think it should be openly acknowledged that our women service members are in harm's way already. ETA: Oops, should have read the article first. NM

lazarus1983 -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/13/2011 9:07:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Why? Woman are not that dumb. Your usual bad grammar and spelling are funny on their own. This time it's dead on hilarious.

Charles6682 -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 12:19:50 AM)
Canada does it.So should we.I dont see why not.As long as the Lady is capable and is aware of the danger,go for it.The Armed Forces should make sure that she is capable,just like they make sure the men they send out are capable as well.

Jaybeee -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 2:15:54 AM)
This would be sweet. Watching the government trying and failing to fill 48.7% of front-line positions with women because most of them are too...what's that word? Oh yes, COWARDLY to fight. When force must be applied, you don't run to Mummy's coat-tail's. You go straight to the Daddy.

tweakabelle -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 3:51:47 AM)
There's prolly quite a few Dommes on this site who would delight in disputing your silly claim with you personally Jaybee [:D]

RapierFugue -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 3:57:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse Let them fight one week of every month. Even the taliban won't mess with them. Reminds me of the Robin Williams line: "A female president would be a great thing. You'd never get any wars, just every 28 days some intense negotiations".

Hillwilliam -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 5:22:31 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tweakabelle There's prolly quite a few Dommes on this site who would delight in disputing your silly claim with you personally Jaybee [:D] Unfortunately, tweakabelle, you cant practice CBT on someone that has no C or B.

thishereboi -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:18:48 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lazarus1983 quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Why? Woman are not that dumb. Your usual bad grammar and spelling are funny on their own. This time it's dead on hilarious. Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git. To the OP: I think women should have the choice to go into combat, but I don't understand why they would want to.

RapierFugue -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:29:17 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git. While agreeing with you in principle, I would point out that trying to educate people is often wasted effort, and only causes others to become sarcastic themselves. In PA's case, it's also completely wasted effort; he's batshit crazy, trolls for fun, and even repeated thumping of him with a clue-by-four isn't going to do it. And it was a splendidly ironic fuck-up/typo :)

rulemylife -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:30:05 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: lazarus1983 quote: ORIGINAL: pahunkboy Why? Woman are not that dumb. Your usual bad grammar and spelling are funny on their own. This time it's dead on hilarious. Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git. To the OP: I think women should have the choice to go into combat, but I don't understand why they would want to. Maybe it would be better if you stop the self-righteousness. If you want to teach him something then do it, but don't complain when other people get tired of listening to it.

thishereboi -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:37:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git. While agreeing with you in principle, I would point out that trying to educate people is often wasted effort, and only causes others to become sarcastic themselves. In PA's case, it's also completely wasted effort; he's batshit crazy, trolls for fun, and even repeated thumping of him with a clue-by-four isn't going to do it. And it was a splendidly ironic fuck-up/typo :) So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell? What part of the sentence was grammatically wrong? Now I have seen PA post some pretty strange shit that looked like it was proofread by a 3rd grader, but I don't understand why lazarus picked that particular post to comment on. Unless like I said before, he couldn't resist the chance to take a shot at PA. Believe it or not, some posters actually get some kind of twisted satisfaction out of belittling others. I suppose it makes them feel smarter in comparison. But enough of the hijack. I wouldn't want to get mod spanked.

rulemylife -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:40:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi quote: ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi Maybe it would be better if you specified exactly what is wrong with that sentence. Then rather than just being insulting, you could actually teach him something. You can start with which word is misspelled? Then maybe you could reword it so it is grammatically correct. Unless of course there was nothing actually wrong with his post and you were just taking the opportunity to be a snarky little git. While agreeing with you in principle, I would point out that trying to educate people is often wasted effort, and only causes others to become sarcastic themselves. In PA's case, it's also completely wasted effort; he's batshit crazy, trolls for fun, and even repeated thumping of him with a clue-by-four isn't going to do it. And it was a splendidly ironic fuck-up/typo :) So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell? What part of the sentence was grammatically wrong? Now I have seen PA post some pretty strange shit that looked like it was proofread by a 3rd grader, but I don't understand why lazarus picked that particular post to comment on. Unless like I said before, he couldn't resist the chance to take a shot at PA. Believe it or not, some posters actually get some kind of twisted satisfaction out of belittling others. I suppose it makes them feel smarter in comparison. But enough of the hijack. I wouldn't want to get mod spanked. Oh for fuck's sake. Woman is singular, the correct usage was women.

RapierFugue -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:41:10 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell? It should have been "women are not that dumb". The special irony comes in someone male describing how another gender are brighter, while proving the point themselves beyond all redemption, in just 5 words. I realise that any joke you have to explain is by default never going to be funny to anyone else, but I could see exactly what lazarus was driving at :)

thishereboi -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:45:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: RapierFugue quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi So maybe you can tell me exactly what was wrong with his post? Which words did he misspell? It should have been "women are not that dumb". The special irony comes in someone male describing how another gender are brighter, while proving the point themselves beyond all redemption, in just 5 words. I realise that any joke you have to explain is by default never going to be funny to anyone else, but I could see exactly what lazarus was driving at :) You are correct. I missed the "e". Well that was certainly worth calling him out on.[8\|] I am sure you and lazarus have never made a typo before, maybe one day PA can be as perfect as you two are. [8D]

RapierFugue -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:47:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thishereboi You are correct. I missed the "e". Well that was certainly worth calling him out on.[8\|] I am sure you and lazarus have never made a typo before, maybe one day PA can be as perfect as you two are. [8D] Getting snippy because you failed to see a joke isn't good reason to have a pop at others. It's just churlish. Have a sit-down and a nice cup of tea or coffee. Hopefully your SoH will return shortly.

tazzygirl -> RE: Army Mulls Women in Combat Arms (1/14/2011 7:48:53 AM)
oh ffs. pa makes racist comments and doesnt even have the decency to appologize for them, instead decides deleting teh entry is "good enough", and you want to defend him??? give me a fucking break.

Page: [1] 2 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875