Kaliko -> RE: going vanilla! (1/23/2011 6:23:21 AM)
|
Okay - well, now that I'm...sigh...single...I kind of wonder about this sometimes - worry about it, actually. I'm much more about D/s relationships - I guess 50's household? I don't know what the exact term would be - than, say, bondage, sensory deprivation, "scenes", high levels of pain, and anything on my body like body wax, etc. My kink could maybe be considered outside of "BDSM" if the man is an ultra traditional kind of man. I mean, I have done and will do all those things - but ultimately, it's because he wants to, not me. I need the submission and extreme acts of service to a strong personality. I do like it rough in the bedroom, but probably nothing that would scare anyone with a little imagination away. I also need the consequences - whether it's a physical spanking or a stern talking to or whatever. Technically, I suppose I could find much of that with a more vanilla-type man. As long as he's somewhat kinky, though kinky doesn't have to mean BDSM. And what I wonder about as well is this...if I am a submissive personality, not needing so much the physical aspects of it, if he is a strong enough personality but just not into, say, spankings or a face slap now and then - would I be happy in that more vanilla-type relationship because I am giving him what he wants? I suppose if he's "vanilla" but willing to allow me to manifest my devotion to him through acts of unconventional and excessive service and submission, and if he was kinky enough to allow some of those acts to be on the extreme ends of the sexual spectrum, and if he could be patient/stern with me when necessary for correction/discipline, and, well, of course, he would need to have that overall dominant personality ....wait...I guess that's D/s, isn't it? LOL - I guess the answer is no, then. Shit.
|
|
|
|