RE: State of the Union

RE: State of the Union (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

SexyBossyBBW -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 5:14:19 AM)
There is a fine line real.... You're not the only person who reads, and is cynical, but there is a line, with cynicism. M

servantforuse -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 5:34:08 AM)
Obama has not changed since day one. He has one answer for everything. Spend more money. Now he calls it investment instead of stimulus. He is an empty suit.

tazzygirl -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 5:36:44 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ElSabio SWISS INVESTOR: ‘FOREIGNERS LAUGH’ AS OBAMA ‘PROSTITUTES HIMSELF’ http://www.theblaze.com/stories/swiss-investor-foreigners-laugh-as-obama-prostitutes-himself/ rofl becks on line paper... yeah buddy... thats some real unbiased journalism there. [;)]

Moonhead -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 5:37:48 AM)
At least it isn't the Mail, for a change...

SexyBossyBBW -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 5:43:19 AM)
Did you see this? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/#41281515 quote: Michele Bachmann the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States....Men like John Quincy Adams, who would not rest until slavery was extinguished in the country." The remarks drew widespread scorn and derision from historians, pundits and journalists. "Is there a history tutor in the house?" asked San Francisco Chronicle blogger Joe Garofoli. Former Republican Chris Mathews gives her hell. It was fun to watch. M

Real0ne -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 5:56:59 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SexyBossyBBW Did you see this? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/#41281515 quote: Michele Bachmann the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States....Men like John Quincy Adams, who would not rest until slavery was extinguished in the country." The remarks drew widespread scorn and derision from historians, pundits and journalists. "Is there a history tutor in the house?" asked San Francisco Chronicle blogger Joe Garofoli. Former Republican Chris Mathews gives her hell. It was fun to watch. M to bad that is a lie huh? people know so LITTLE about life! quote: Nexum From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Nexum was a debt bondage contract in the early Roman Republic. The debtor pledged his person as collateral should he default on his loan. Nexum was abolished by the Lex Poetelia Papiria in 326 BC. Nexum was a form of mancipatio, a symbolic transfer of rights that involved a set of scales, copper weights, and a formulaic oath.[1] Under the nexum contract, a free man became a bond slave, or nexus, until he could pay off his debt to the indebted, or obaeratus. Varro derives the term nexum from nec suum, "not one's own," and although this etymology is incorrect in the view of modern scientific linguistics, it illuminates the Roman understanding of the term.[2] you are a slave neo! people need to STOP for one second and think! if you pop a kid tomorrow he has a debt around his neck to the tune of 40,000 bucks that he has to pay off the second he hits the floor! They use a different word or words to describe the same thing and then claim what was abhorrent has been abolished! "syntax terrorism"! Thats only for the ON BOOK accounting! that is and always has been known since the beginning of time as SLAVERY! BOND SLAVERY! People enslave themselves through ignorance.

tazzygirl -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 6:01:12 AM)
Damn, and here i thought that was indentured servitude. Yep, it is!

Real0ne -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 6:08:42 AM)
not the same thing taz. the "debt" runs across all lines and classes regardless of who you are if you operate within a given society that has the debt. This is with regard to the full faith and credit clause, the misuse by both society and the gubmint and the imposition of the democracy upon the rights of those in the republic. That is slavery as pure and simple as it can get. the irony is people think themselves free which gives a whole new spotlight to the person who said: NONE are more hopelessly lost than slaves who think they are free when slavery is a way of life how can a slave ever see it differently when they do not know and cannot calculate there is the other side to the fence in front of them?

tazzygirl -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 6:10:42 AM)
quote: Nexum was abolished by the Lex Poetelia Papiria in 326 BC. Dude, let it go!

Real0ne -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 6:20:52 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: servantforuse Obama has not changed since day one. He has one answer for everything. Spend more money. Now he calls it investment instead of stimulus. He is an empty suit. so he broke his promise? does that come under breach of trust or breach of contract? [8D]

Real0ne -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 6:24:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: SexyBossyBBW Did you see this? http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/#41281515 quote: Michele Bachmann the very founders that wrote those documents worked tirelessly until slavery was no more in the United States....Men like John Quincy Adams, who would not rest until slavery was extinguished in the country." The remarks drew widespread scorn and derision from historians, pundits and journalists. "Is there a history tutor in the house?" asked San Francisco Chronicle blogger Joe Garofoli. Former Republican Chris Mathews gives her hell. It was fun to watch. M to bad that is a lie huh? people know so LITTLE about life! quote: Nexum From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Nexum was a debt bondage contract in the early Roman Republic. The debtor pledged his person as collateral should he default on his loan. Nexum was abolished by the Lex Poetelia Papiria in 326 BC. Nexum was a form of mancipatio, a symbolic transfer of rights that involved a set of scales, copper weights, and a formulaic oath.[1] Under the nexum contract, a free man became a bond slave, or nexus, until he could pay off his debt to the indebted, or obaeratus. Varro derives the term nexum from nec suum, "not one's own," and although this etymology is incorrect in the view of modern scientific linguistics, it illuminates the Roman understanding of the term.[2] you are a slave neo! people need to STOP for one second and think! if you pop a kid tomorrow he has a debt around his neck to the tune of 40,000 bucks that he has to pay off the second he hits the floor! They use a different word or words to describe the same thing and then claim what was abhorrent has been abolished! "syntax terrorism"! Thats only for the ON BOOK accounting! that is and always has been known since the beginning of time as SLAVERY! BOND SLAVERY! People enslave themselves through ignorance. quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote: Nexum was abolished by the Lex Poetelia Papiria in 326 BC. Dude, let it go! Taz you are smarter than this. I repeat: They use a different word or words to describe the same thing and then claim what was abhorrent has been abolished! Meaning it was NOT abolished only and are you ready for this? RE-VENUED They are such sneeky wabbits!!!

tazzygirl -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 6:25:57 AM)
And there was an end in sight to the servitude... making it servitude and not slavery.

SexyBossyBBW -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 6:45:11 AM)
That's right real, pardon me. Those apples and unicorns are indistinguishable. [:@] M

Real0ne -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 9:15:05 AM)
you can laugh and poke fun because I used an example that is so obvious its like getting hit in the head with a 2 x 4, but others are not so obvious. When you go to court and are asked if you "under-stand the charges" it can mean anything from the way linguistically challenged idjits of america know it which is the synonymous to "comprehend" all the way back to contract law which is do you under-write or stand-under (as in be the surety of and for, meaning agree to the:) the charges being levied against you by the charging officer. If that is the way the judge construes it there is nothing you can say after that, that you can use in your defense and you are guilty by your own foolish admission! My point being one and the same, the BAR and their pals in collusion use syntax terrorism to extort money from people. because they can! Because you (generically speaking) let them and many times even agree with them. have you under-stood and gotten out of any traffic tickets lately? LOL

mnottertail -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 9:38:48 AM)
If I have to use phonetic prestidigitation, or panjandromonious phraseology, or unintentional intent, or like a loquacious spider monkey lavishly lapidary the law according to the Magna Charta, and only make it not worth their time to fine me for a traffic ticket they can have my $50 bucks and piss on it. I am outta there to go get drunk.

pahunkboy -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 9:44:49 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ElSabio SWISS INVESTOR: ‘FOREIGNERS LAUGH’ AS OBAMA ‘PROSTITUTES HIMSELF’ http://www.theblaze.com/stories/swiss-investor-foreigners-laugh-as-obama-prostitutes-himself/ And yet we sell fiat dollars- while holding and refusing the give the gold back to Germany, France and Japan. Even tho they have all asked for it back. He who owns the gold- makes the rules.... which is us.

mnottertail -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 9:50:41 AM)
anyone can ask for anything, don't mean any of it is theres.

pahunkboy -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 10:04:01 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail anyone can ask for anything, don't mean any of it is theres. It is actually quite brilliant. We give them paper or digits on the screen- while we hoard to gold at Fort Knox- and in the WTC.

defiantbadgirl -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 10:13:41 AM)
I don't know why we continue to call the speech a "State of the Union." What union can there be in a nation filled with so much selfishness and greed? I don't think United States describes us anymore. Our government isn't for the people. It's for the corporations. Why not just re-name ourselves Corporate America?

Musicmystery -> RE: State of the Union (1/27/2011 10:16:52 AM)
Because the President is required to report to Congress on the state of the union. While not required in this form, tradition has done so with an annual address. The rest is pointless whining. Enjoy.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 [5] 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.09375