RE: Thanks for the permission (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Chulain -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 9:52:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Ishtarr
Same thing for both scenarios: if I had refused the beating, or cleaning the bathroom, I would have been kicked out.

So you were coerced? If someone is willing to threaten, coerce, blackmail, break the law, etc., then sure, all bets are off. I have never maintained otherwise.

quote:

I never said that I had to from a legal point of view... in fact, I've made it VERY clear multiple time that it was expect of me IF I wanted to remain in the relationship.

And why did you stay? Would you have starved if you had been kicked out? If so, that doesn't sound like much a consensual relationship to me.




LadyPact -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 10:12:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant
Before I get started, let me remind you that you know I respect yours' and clip's relationship/dynamic.  I am sure that clip submits because the desire to do so is within him and that his desire to serve you and be with you are prime motivating factors.
That said...
Remember the thread about male submissives?  Remember that it was noted that while there is an abundance of male submissives, there are a handful of female Dominants in comparison.  This allows the female dominant to be fairly choosy and to set the guidelines in a way that suits her more so than it allows the submissive to dictate things.  While this is not to say that a male submissive will not have his wants and desires considered nor that they do not have at least some say in the structure of the dynamic, it is pretty clear that his voice is not as strong as hers.
 
It does not work that way in an awful lot of male Dominant/female submissive dynamics.  Yes, the Dominant male is the leader and yes, his may be the main voice in the structuring of the dynamic.  But...there are oodles and oodles of male Dominants out there...witness the submissives, even long-standing members of collarme, who receive unsolicited email from "Dominants seeking..." every day.  There are not that many unencumbered female submissives by comparison.  And just like in female Dominant/male submissive dynamics, this allows female submissives to be more choosy and to have a stronger voice in the dynamic/relationship structure. 
Now....many male Dominants and, I am sure, even more female submissives will deny that.  But, I point you to the threads you are thinking of when you posted this.  I point them to many threads in which it can easily be seen that a female submissive's behavior, if bratty, is considered cute.  How much of that do you see in female Dominant/male submissive dynamics?  I point them to the many threads in which the changing nature of a female submissive's personality...not as submissive on some days as on others....are expected to be recognized and understood each and every time they occur.  How much of that is allowed to go on in your dynamic, Lady Pact?  In other female Dominant/male submissive dynamics?  Look at your own words below:  You make decison X.  You EXPECT clip to submit to decision X.  If clip does not want to submit to decision X, he is free to leave the dynamic.  Now then, while there are a few that will admit to it (Me being one of them)....most male Dominants cannot, at least in the beginnings of a dynamic, afford to be that, for lack of a better word, cavalier about their dynamic.  And many female submissives...though they will pay lip service to their own obedience and deny it...would not stand for a dynamic in which this was the rule for very long.  I have seen it personally...and I have seen it in many conversations I have had with female submissives.  Again...the ration comes into play.

A number of very interesting points in this, Creative.  The first one that I'm going to give you right off of the bat is that the original was *not* written with a new dynamic in mind.  I absolutely see the obedience issue as one that increases over time as trust increases.  That is definitely how it has worked for us.  Trust, as well as expectations of obedience have increased as the dynamic has more longevity.

Quick mention here.  No, the bratty thing is not considered "cute" by Me.  No offense to anyone out there who has that as a part of the dynamic, but it's not something that works for Me.  I recently mentioned in another thread that, even if MP were submissive, he and I would not work as D/s and I'm basing that on the very concept that he is a brat type.  I know this from our discussions together and that is exactly why we would be hypothetically mismatched.

It's an interesting thought there that you have on what I've been calling the 'numbers game' lately.  This being the very concept that women on either side of the kneel (especially on sites like CM) have more of an advantage when it comes to the selection of partners.  It's very interesting to Me thinking this also may be a factor, especially in the beginning of a dynamic.

quote:

Though it has not happened a lot, I can tell you that I have had more than one cmail from submissives who took exception to these statements in my profile..."If you are going to submit, then do so."  "....(paraphrasing myself here) It is my way or the highway".  Even though there are explanations with both statements that lessen the harshness of first reading/sound of the statements.

I will go on to read the rest of the thread and add more later.  Interesting post, LadyP...smiles

This does lead Me to wonder if, due to the circumstances of numbers, that some are more lenient in their expectations of obedience for different periods.  Something for Me to mull over.



Edited...... fixing quotes.......again.




RCdc -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 10:12:26 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: RCdc


quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

For me, and me alone......it really will be as simple as my way or the highway. She has one choice, to submit or not.


I think that people(in discussions like this) tend to get fixated on the fact that someone says 'submit only once and that's that' thing.
Having authority doesn't suddenly make a person empty or misogynistic or unable to take other peoples suggestions on board. And saying ok, let's try it the way you suggest, doesn't mean someone's lost authority and submitting to their property.



Except.......that one choice, to submit or not, is made constantly.

And I totally agree.........listening to suggestions is only a good thing. Here at work I completely acknowledge that, in reality, I am probably the least knowledgeable person in the facility when it comes to the work we do. The guys come to me with suggestions, and questions, all the time. It is my leadership to listen and decide how to proceed. On occasion the way we proceed is not one they like. Quite often I don't even particularly like it.

BUT, that isn't what I am talking about. The crux of the matter is that I am the one making the final decision and that decision is the one that gets followed whether they like it or not. If they choose to defy, they they are placing their future employment on the line. So yes, as the leader, again........it is ultimately my way (working here) or the highway (working elsewhere).



I totally understand what you are saying(even if I'm not vocalising it well). And Master works along the same thoughts.
I think that people end up 'arguing' about the whole permission concept though because they get it in their head that there was never any consideration of what is best... and that it's always only a purely selfish thing. It's not about getting permission constantly from your property.




Chulain -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 10:26:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RCdc
It's not about getting permission constantly from your property.

Every time you do not stop him, you are implicitly consenting to his treatment.




RCdc -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 10:31:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chulain

quote:

ORIGINAL: RCdc
It's not about getting permission constantly from your property.

Every time you do not stop him, you are implicitly consenting to his treatment.



And?




Icarys -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 11:22:31 AM)

quote:

I don't really think My way or the highway is either necessarily a bad thing and I don't believe it's terribly uncommon. In a certain way, I don't even think it's just for those of us who are in authority based dynamics. It might get stretched to 'our way or the highway' in those cases, but still the same concept.

Just wanted to hear your take on it..so many times people have been raked over the coals for that type of attitude which is wrong in my book. We all have that attitude about something at some time or another. Life is made up of situations of "My way or the highway".

I don't see it as wrong either nor uncommon in the least. I actually enjoy the hell out of it.[:D] Knowing that a woman who chooses to accept me and a relationship like that for what it is...Just great in my book.

I'm more than game to "take advantage" of it without "taking advantage" of it if you know what I mean.




Icarys -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 11:24:46 AM)

quote:

And?

Creative pic but a little gruesome lol..was that a filter of some sort?




Chulain -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 11:36:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RCdc
And?

There is no "and." That's it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: ladypact
This does lead me to wonder if, due to the circumstances of numbers, that some are more lenient in their expectations of obedience for different periods.  Something for me to mull over.

Why do you capitalize "me?" Are all your replies directed at your submissive, and We just happen to be in the way?




LadyPact -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 11:55:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys
Just wanted to hear your take on it..so many times people have been raked over the coals for that type of attitude which is wrong in my book. We all have that attitude about something at some time or another. Life is made up of situations of "My way or the highway".

I don't see it as wrong either nor uncommon in the least. I actually enjoy the hell out of it.[:D] Knowing that a woman who chooses to accept me and a relationship like that for what it is...Just great in my book.

I'm more than game to "take advantage" of it without "taking advantage" of it if you know what I mean.

I think we see eye to eye on the matter.  While some folks don't particularly care for the expression, I really do think that many could apply the basic premise.  Darn near everybody has something that it just isn't possible to tolerate.  Some that are darker than I'd even want to type out that have absolutely nothing to do with kink.




LadyPact -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 11:58:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chulain
Why do you capitalize "me?" Are all your replies directed at your submissive, and We just happen to be in the way?


In part, yes.  The other part is that I don't allow others to dictate what I do and that includes My writing style.  If it bothers you, there's a nice hide button right over there.




RCdc -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 11:58:48 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

And?

Creative pic but a little gruesome lol..was that a filter of some sort?



Xray... heh :)

Much love you, You Master Icarys.




RCdc -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:01:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chulain
There is no "and." That's it.


The 'and' was asking you what your point is? I am not property who argues for consensual non consent nor consent... so your point doesn't really fit for this relationship... unless you care to explain what you mean.




Chulain -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:09:36 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ladypact
In part, yes.  The other part is that i don't allow others to dictate what i do and that includes my writing style.  If it bothers You, there's a nice hide button right over there.

Nope, doesn't bother me. Well, it is a bit silly, but hey, no harm, no foul.

I was going to mention the ignore list to you, as well.




LadyPact -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:14:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Chulain
Nope, doesn't bother me. Well, it is a bit silly, but hey, no harm, no foul.

I was going to mention the ignore list to you, as well.


Oh, I'm actually aware of it.  Have been for some time.  (As you get to know Me, you'll come to find that I'm something of a computer twit, so people really do have to tell Me these things.)  Still, nobody has yet found anything on the net that bothers Me enough to have Me hide them.  I just tend to shrug people off if they don't affect My life.  I'm much more concerned about the people in it.




Icarys -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:16:14 PM)

quote:

Much love you, You Master Icarys.


Huggs and Love.[sm=hearts.gif]

They have some awesome PS filters out so wasn't sure.




Chulain -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:19:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RCdc
The 'and' was asking you what your point is? I am not property who argues for consensual non consent nor consent... so your point doesn't really fit for this relationship... unless you care to explain what you mean.

What do you mean by "I am not property who argues for consensual non consent nor consent?" I hope you're not trying to tell me your relationship is non-consensual, because I ran out of tickets for that ride with Ishtarr, and I'm not going to buy another batch.




RCdc -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:22:00 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Icarys

quote:

Much love you, You Master Icarys.


Huggs and Love.[sm=hearts.gif]

They have some awesome PS filters out so wasn't sure.



I am working with the latest CS... it's awesome! x




RCdc -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:23:38 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Chulain
What do you mean by "I am not property who argues for consensual non consent nor consent?" I hope you're not trying to tell me your relationship is non-consensual, because I ran out of tickets for that ride with Ishtarr, and I'm not going to buy another batch.



I don't believe in the concept of consent (and that includes non-consent too). But that's another thread and I've board the forum enough with this before.[;)]




DesFIP -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:29:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


This does lead Me to wonder if, due to the circumstances of numbers, that some are more lenient in their expectations of obedience for different periods.  Something for Me to mull over.




I've missed several pages of the thread so I don't know if I'm repeating what's already been said. But it seems that the above is the problem in your understanding. You are assuming that all d/s relationships are based entirely on obedience.

And that's not true, at least not for all M/f relationships. I know those who are based on obedience, those based on service, and those based on emotional transparency. Mine is the last. I'm not supposed to obey him regardless if it causes me to distance myself from him. I follow because he's a superior leader. But he doesn't want me to follow if it's going to negatively impact me loving him.

He was this way when he managed over a hundred people, he wanted people to first come talk to them. He counted it a failure if they did what they were told and quietly looked for another job. Training someone is costly in time and money and he wanted employees who were happy to work for him. The same is true in our personal relationship, love is paramount, he wants me to want to be with him, to be happy to be there.

But as I know I've said elsewhere, he's not a sadist so he doesn't get off seeing me suffer. In any way. And I know that it's different if you are a sadist, that then you give orders designed to make the sub suffer. And this is a point that I think gets overlooked, that making a sub unhappy is often what the dom wants in order to feed his/her inner sadist. That doesn't exist here.




Chulain -> RE: Thanks for the permission (1/31/2011 12:30:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RCdc
I don't believe in the concept of consent (and that includes non-consent too). But that's another thread and I've board the forum enough with this before.[;)]

Whether you believe in it or not, the law does, and as far as the law is concerned, you can withdraw your consent at any time. Whether you choose to do that is up to you, obviously. But you can't disbelieve consent away. You could try to implement changes in the law, if you're so inclined.

The point is, as far as the law is concerned, the only thing holding you to him is your desire to remain so. Without the force of law to back up any claims or remedies he may seek, it will always be nothing more than your desire which holds you.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 [8] 9 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625