Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005 Status: offline
|
I'm crazy, so give me a PO box # or somewhere to send the proverial grain of salt. I've dealt with three very suicidal people, and two of them are still alive. The other, I think I kept them going for some time, but that one had some pretty compelling reasons, and didn't call - that last time. I might as well bring up that case. He had Huntington's, his Mother had died restrained to a hospital bed, convulsing uncontrollably. But that wasn't why he did it. He knew he had the disease and was generally in good spirits. However he remembered her actions in earlier stages of the disease. Huntington's affects the brain, and for a time she was still lucid and functional, but simply didn't give a shit about anything. I can't really be sure it was a manifestation of the disease, but it was in his opinion. He had been planning suicide for a long time; "When I get to that point......." . I am one of the most stoic people on the planet, but his self inflicted demise HURT me. I tried, this ws my friend. In other cases I was able to fight it, and make people realize a few things. Not this time. This is a real disease with no viable cure, or even very successful management. He said that she got tremors, and drinking actually helped - in the short term of course. Even not drinking his Mother would smash cars and simply not care. She had become a danger to society, he told me. He said he did not want to be like that, that he didn't want to hurt people. That he was going to "do it" someday, when he got to a certain point. He also said that he could feel the tremors. How the hell do you fight that ? He had already put up a noose and did the balancing act in attempts to control the tremors more than once. To actually put his life on the line, to die if he lost self control. One false move so to speak. All this was going on before I even met him. Now to address the actual question - requires this question : Did he have the right to befriend anyone ? Just for the sake of argument, equate the suicidal tendency with a terminal disease. While many prefer to die alone, does that mean they should live the end of their life alone ? I mean the last few months or years. Should they be placed in something like a leper colony ? Hang around waiting for the Reverend to make some special koolaid ? I think not. I don't think it would be fair, or right. Everybody dies, it's just a matter of when. Then comes the question of say, an older Man falling in love with a younger Woman. He can generally assume that he will die first, which would hurt her. I'm not talking about a gold digger and a rich guy. I mean a real relatioship. Is it fair to her ? No, it is not. But that is life. Life isn't fair, and never will be. But if we refuse to live it, we might as well be dead anyway. And that razor cuts alot deeper than the obviuos. Without an actual terminal illness, there is still the subject of deep depression. They know alot less about depression than they think. I believe that treating it chemically should be the absolute last resort. "An imbalance in the brain" they say. Well an imbalance in the brain can be caused by one's surroundings, and/or their perception thereof. Without some sort of disease and for sure a limited future, it is all in the mind. What put it there ? I doubt it was a lack of protien. I don't know what more to say really, but isolation is bad for almost anyone. Logically most depressed or suicidal people lack the sense of self worth. Else why would they destroy something of value ? If you're involved with someone suicidal, you MAKE IT CLEAR that they have worth, at least to you. Hopefully that's enough. But if you're not there, the option doesn't exist. There are always more questions than answers. Why is she unpopular ? Was she spoiled rotten as a kid ? There are many questions to be answered before anything can be done. But I will say now - isolation is not the answer. T^T
|