Circumcision in various populations (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Rule -> Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 8:57:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella
In West Africa infant circumcision may have had tribal significance as a rite of passage or otherwise in the past; today in some non-Muslim Nigerian societies it is medicalised and is simply a cultural norm. Circumcision is part of initiation rites in some African, Pacific Islander, and Australian aboriginal traditions in areas such as Arnhem Land, where the practice was introduced by Makassan traders from Sulawesi in the Indonesian Archipelago.Circumcision ceremonies among certain Australian aboriginal societies are noted for their painful nature: subincision is practised amongst some aboriginal peoples in the Western Desert.
In the Pacific, circumcision or superincision is nearly universal among the Melanesians of Fiji and Vanuatu, while participation in the traditional land diving on Pentecost Island is reserved for those who have been circumcised. Circumcision or superincision is also commonly practiced in the Polynesian islands of Samoa, Tonga, Niue, and Tikopia, where the custom is recorded as a pre-Christian/colonial practice. In Samoa it is accompanied by a celebration.
Among some West African groups, such as the Dogon and Dowayo, circumcision is taken to represent a removal of "feminine" aspects of the male, turning boys into fully masculine males. Among the Urhobo of southern Nigeria it is symbolic of a boy entering into manhood. The ritual expression, Omo te Oshare ("the boy is now man"), constitutes a rite of passage from one age set to another. For Nilotic peoples, such as the Kalenjin and Maasai, circumcision is a rite of passage observed collectively by a number of boys every few years, and boys circumcised at the same time are taken to be members of a single age set.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision




Musicmystery -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 8:58:47 AM)

You sure worry about cocks a lot.




mnottertail -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 9:05:19 AM)

polynesian jews, them fuckin guys get around and dip that schlong all over, don't they?

I have never been to the kibbutz at Apia, but would like to go.

Here is their version of the Shema:

"Tulouna a Tumua ma Pule,
Tulouna a Itu’au ma Alataua,
Tulouna a Aiga-i-le-Tai,
Ma le Va’a-o-Fonoti,
Tulouna a Tama ma a latou aiga
Po’o aiga ma a latou tama".




Elisabella -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 9:08:11 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

You sure worry about cocks a lot.


He's affirming his manhood. It's cute.

As someone who's seen more labia-inspired artwork than I ever wanted to, I think it's adorable that guys are doing the same sort of thing.




pahunkboy -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 9:38:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

You sure worry about cocks a lot.


He's affirming his manhood. It's cute.

As someone who's seen more labia-inspired artwork than I ever wanted to, I think it's adorable that guys are doing the same sort of thing.


No he doesn't.  The topic came up on another thread. I asked them to start a new thread.

Rule is merely setting this topic to its own thread- rather then derail the other thread.




Musicmystery -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 9:41:59 AM)

The topic comes up seemingly everywhere he posts. It is to him what silver and the Fed are to you and archaic observations about sovereignty, law and conspiracy are to ro.

But yes, at least he started his own thread.





Rule -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 9:58:42 AM)

Actually I had and have no intention of discussing circumcision. I was merely clarifying to Demspotis what I meant by saying "Muslims are Jews": that I did not refer to a religious nor an ethnic identity by that, but to a Social Darwinist concept as defined by me.




DomKen -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:09:24 AM)

More of your blathering about circumcision causing genetic disease. I wish you'd get a clue.




pahunkboy -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:18:42 AM)

Do you have anything constructive to add to the thread?

We are waiting.




tazzygirl -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:20:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Do you have anything constructive to add to the thread?

We are waiting.



You have no room to ask that of anyone. [8|]

As far as circumcisions... if the flesh makes the man... what does that say about the man?




pahunkboy -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:23:22 AM)

The thing is once it is done- it is not reversible. So lets say I get convinced that I should not be circumcised- it is not like I can un-do it. 




Rule -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:31:58 AM)

I do not have him on Hide as I respect his limitations. However, as it is no use to discuss anything with someone who is oblivious to the fact that he is no match for me, the best thing that I can and will do is to ignore his remarks.




tazzygirl -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:32:36 AM)

Exactly. And to state, emphatically, by either side, that having it or not having it made a major difference in your performance/sex life/feeling of manliness is a blanket lie.




Lucylastic -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:33:59 AM)

considering the above remark, is it possible to get this moved to the correct section of the forum?




Rule -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:43:13 AM)

The consequences go beyond the individual level. This is about population genetics, not individual genetics. One can be circumcised and not have any progeny, yet nevertheless contribute to an increased frequency of deleterious alleles in the future gene pool.




mnottertail -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:43:48 AM)

pure asswipe.




pahunkboy -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 11:51:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

The consequences go beyond the individual level. This is about population genetics, not individual genetics. One can be circumcised and not have any progeny, yet nevertheless contribute to an increased frequency of deleterious alleles in the future gene pool.


How so?   I dont get it.




Rule -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 12:02:30 PM)

You have an open mind. I will inform you privately by cmail.




Politesub53 -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 12:30:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

I do not have him on Hide as I respect his limitations. However, as it is no use to discuss anything with someone who is oblivious to the fact that he is no match for me, the best thing that I can and will do is to ignore his remarks.


Hard to argue with you since you set your own concepts huh.




Rule -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/1/2011 12:35:43 PM)

I have no idea what you are referring to.




Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125