|
Rule -> RE: Circumcision in various populations (2/4/2011 12:39:36 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: outhere69
quote:
ORIGINAL: Moonhead
Watching him trying to talk around the fact that he's suggesting a lamarckian mechanism for inheritance of acquired traits can be pretty funny, though...
Where did I ever talk about the inheritance of acquired traits? Nobody can quote me on that. This remark does show, though, that anyone who has the impression that I did, either did not read my post 15 or did not comprehend my post 15.
I do note that as yet nobody has responded to Elisabella's post as quoted by me in the opening post.
I also note that there have been a number of odd replies to Elisabella's text, starting with Musicmysteries' post number two, which appears to be addressed to me instead of to Elisabella's text.
Then there is DomKen's post number six in which he strangely remarks that I am blathering about circumcision causing genetic disease. First of all I do not blather, and secondly in the previous posts in this thread I did not mention genetic diseases at all.
jlf1961, the resident forum troll with the numerous sock-puppet profiles, incongruously in his post 36 makes a remark about me, the opening poster, instead of responding to the text by Elisabella quoted in the opening post.
There are also various people who demonstrate a lack of comprehension.
Politesub53 in his post 19 shows that he does not comprehend scientific discourse and methodology.
cyprian in his or her post 33 appears to make up his own reality since he or she wonders or concludes that I have been alluding something. If anyone can quote any of my previous five thousand or six thousand posts where I allude anything, I will be both interested as well as surprised. In any case his or her made up reality is preposterous.
|
|
|
|
