|
BenevolentM -> RE: Value of Poetry (2/5/2011 1:09:54 PM)
|
This is a repost for reasons stated in the post from another thread. "Is Love Inconvenient?" in All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion located at http://www.collarchat.com/m_3548516/tm.htm
quote:
ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance
You doubt a woman can understand the concept of nesting?
No, that was not on my mind. My understanding is deep. It is extremely unlikely that your understanding is deep. I did not wish to digress so I cut to the chase. You assume that all that I have on my mind is what women can or cannot grasp. I'll put it this way, I look forward to being pleasantly surprised. That said, it isn't on the forefront of my mind either. You are being much too suspicious.
In another thread "Value of Poetry" in All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Gorean Lifestyles located at http://www.collarchat.com/m_3552515/tm.htm this dreadful person went on about generosity. Generosity on your part is in order, but I'll have to explain something else before I can say what I want to say here. In that thread I wrote "Logic has bounds and meters." The people I am confronting have a shallow understanding of logic. They really haven't spent much time studying it. As I see it you are being shallow too, but in another way. Logic is not all powerful and not everything falls under the umbrella of logic. Most things in life don't. Some things do. This was my intended segue for the title of the thread "Value of Poetry". Poetry can take you to that place that logic cannot. I'll have to repost this there. After the discipline of logic comes the discipline of poetry. Call that a thesis.
By asking for generosity I'm not making an appeal to logic. I'm making an appeal to civility. You, as in the generic you, want civility, but I see no evidence that you are willing to give it. It is all about what I can do for you and not what you can do for me. I'm turning the tables, but in doing so I am encouraging you to return to your true self. The what men owe women, for example, is worn out. It does not encourage civility. It does, but in a manner that is hollow. It is Luciferian according to the less than complimentary connotation. What I'm saying is that at its foundation is a lie. I'm not interested in that paradigm. I don't want anything to do with it. I find it sickening. I don't want lies. I think it is fair to say that we both don't really want that.
Revision History
There was a problem with the BBCode that I needed to fix.
|
|
|
|
