RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery

RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

Tantriqu -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/9/2011 2:22:39 PM)
I'm from the first province to legalise voting for women. As the Urban Dictionary sez, We will cut you. A knife is VERY phallic active aggression, no? yes. So is a poisonous snake: it's a matter of size; most men are larger/taller/stronger/faster, and acts upon impulse more often, and faster: a knife or poison allows an opponent a more equal playing field. Should you think of physical defense or revenge. I prefer a cutting remark. So there!

SexyBossyBBW -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/9/2011 2:38:28 PM)
LOL You're scaring me. [&o] M

LillyBoPeep -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/10/2011 7:39:06 AM)
LnT - i think you're reading too far into what i was saying. =p what i was saying was simply about illuminating SOME negative traits of SOME women to contrast with this "all women on a pedestal" mentality. obviously there are men who've poisoned people, too. obviously there are men who are passive aggressive. obviously there are men who've never committed a crime or act of violence, and there are women who have. there are women who shoot, stab, strangle, just like there are women who poison and drown their children. obviously things are situational, but that doesn't really factor into the point i was trying to make. as far as the issue of African Americans go, that nonconsensual slavery imbalance (as specific slavery -- not getting into anything else here) no longer exists. so there is no need for passive-aggression on part of AAs as a segment of the population. =p but for women, those power imbalances or conditioning experiences still exist on a pretty broad scale, which is why criminal psychology still identifies it as a method often used by female murderers. Otter -- you're hilarious and wonderful. =p haha

iwearpanties -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/17/2011 4:12:23 AM)
i didnt see when this post was frist placed at the site or when other replyed but all i can say to nakeplaything is let it go i know what your going thru ... all ican say let it go

Nanako -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/17/2011 6:26:41 AM)
I'm mostly going to give this thread a wide berth >.> But i will say that I aim for feminine and submissive, two seperate traits

VaguelyCurious -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/17/2011 12:28:12 PM)
Ah, but is your choice of hosiery the most important factor in achieving those aims? [8D][8D]

OttersSwim -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/17/2011 2:40:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious Ah, but is your choice of hosiery the most important factor in achieving those aims? [8D][8D] Come now VC, the answer to that is patently obvious and simply goes without saying... I mean... Did Hitler invade the Sudetenland before he had picked out his best black and red knickers with the little swastikas running down the legs? NO! Did Stalin deport 400,000 Volga Germans to Central Asia and Siberia without his red silk "footie" tights with the easy entry or exit trap door on the butt fitting snugly on under his uniform? NO! Did J. Edgar Hoover protest the detention of Japanese Americans in internment camps during WWII without his favorite back seamed nylons with the 38 lady's derringer holster in pink and yellow satin with bows in the garters? NO! Did Jimmy Carter flee a killer swamp rabbit on April 20, 1979 in Plains, Georgia without his favorite Mr. Planter peanut leotards under his jeans? NO! I think that if you look through history you will find that every major decision made was preceded by the careful selection of undergarments and hosiery for the event, and that those garments were instrumental in the shaping of history... Why all you Ladies can't just put on your fancy knickers and go conquer Iran is simply beyond me...you have the power...you were all born women...you are SUPERIOR...I mean...Kim Jong-il would be shakin' in his commie boots if just two of you were to put on your yummy sushi jammies and march in and kick his ass and totally take over his country! You and Lady H should be able to do it and be back by lunch... [;)]

Nanako -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/17/2011 2:45:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious Ah, but is your choice of hosiery the most important factor in achieving those aims? [8D][8D] Not for me, but clients seem to love long stockings, so I end up wearing them a lot anyway. Personally I prefer anything loose and flowy, preferably emphasizing the hips. ^^

VaguelyCurious -> RE: query to fd's about forced fem involving sheer hosiery (2/17/2011 3:42:57 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OttersSwim Did Stalin deport 400,000 Volga Germans to Central Asia and Siberia without his red silk "footie" tights with the easy entry or exit trap door on the butt fitting snugly on under his uniform? NO! This image will stay with me for a long time. I think I might love you. [:D][:D][:D]

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.3125