MasterSlaveLA -> RE: Control: what, how, why? (2/14/2011 5:56:32 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DesFIP quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterSlaveLA Sure... you can certainly desire both, but I've found that's closer to the D/s or M/s realm. Why? Because for the "kinky sex" crowd, that's really all it is... kinky sex, and said "control" stops at the bedroom door. However, for the M/s and/or D/s crowd, without the mental/emotional security that comes with control, the physical (wet bits and all) isn't likely to follow. I disagree. I played with him before he started exerting much control and bondage by itself is an immediate turn on. I actually don't find it to be controlling or d/s. It's playtime for us, not a demonstration of him being in charge. I feel more submissive when he takes control of nonsexual things, real things that affect my real life positively by him solving a problem. Although I have to admit that yesterday when he decreed we needed to get bags and bags of gravel to fix potholes in the iced over driveway I was feeling more sore than submissive. But I'm extremely grateful he identified and implemented a solution. Now he may feel that bondage is a demonstration of his uberdomliness but I doubt it as I think he would have mentioned it by now. He finds bondage to be an artistic activity with me as canvas. He's big on symmetry in ties. And of course, for us it's a highly sexual activity. I understand what you've stated, so either we do, in fact, disagree, or I'm not explaining what I'm referring to correctly? For most I know that fall into the "kinky sex" crowd, control (via bondage, to use your example) is merely a means to an end -- wet sexy bits. For those I know that fall into the "M/s" and/or "D/s" crowd, no amount of bondage (again, to use your example) by someone they don't deem able/worthy to control them will lead to wet sexy bits. Quite simply, they're not turned-on by just anyone dominating them and are not part of the "play" camp -- i.e., it's not merely being dominated/controlled that feeds their heart, mind, and sexy bits... it's the security in surrenduring control to one they feel secure enough to own (i.e., lead) them. In fact, the BDSM accoutrements of whips, floggers, rope, cuffs, collars, and so forth are not central to the dynamic -- security, safety, domination, consistency, and boundaries are. Hopefully the above clarifies a bit... but if not, then I suppose we simply disagree. (shrugs)
|
|
|
|