Nanako
Posts: 222
Joined: 2/7/2011 From: Glasgow, Scotland Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: porcelaine quote:
ORIGINAL: Nanako i don't understand your comments about using i/we. i is used to refer to oneself, we when speaking on behalf of oneself and an indeterminate number of others. I interpreted LadyPact's use of "we" as expressing an opinion she and clip share. Are you telling me it's something else? Maybe that's what you're saying and I read it wrong. I'm not speaking on behalf of my dominant(s) because our relationship is barely starting, and because they're not following this discussion, so I used "I" to express my own views on a matter.^^ Greetings, The perspective noted is one I utilize in my relationships, notably those involving a power exchange. As a slave, it is impossible for me to be singularly focused on having my needs accounted for when my existence within the partnership is directed and determined by the other party. Haii ^^ I know, I meant it's HIS responsibility to make sure your needs are met. If you're exclusively focused on him, then would you not agree that he has taken on responsibility of care for you ? I believe your needs in the relationship should be outlined before it begins, and the responsibility falls to him to ensure they are met. quote:
It's inevitable that my desires will run counter to his and to expect him to acquiesce to appease (me) is quite unthinkable. My commitment to the relationship and our collective betterment reigns supreme. Whether this involves sacrifice on either end is of no consequence if the union is made better because of it. Desires and appeasement are a different matter altogether. With needs I talk about the things that are necessary for you to serve at your best, like being well and sane. When it comes to desires, certainly his come first. quote:
quote:
IUf what the dominant wants is to give the sub what they want, good for them. I'm certain that line of thought works well for you, but it isn't something I can corroborate. I sincerely believe in adhering to the structure I've agreed to. He is king in good times and bad. I don't see how we're disagreeing here. Would he expect oral sex from you when you have flu and can barely breathe? Would he expect you to run around the house doing chores with a broken leg? Certainly he is king in bad times too, but reality won't warp to his demands, and sometimes you may not be able to serve as well as usual. To expect it of you at those times would not be good. quote:
And even in those moments when I don't receive what I wish, I know he has my best interests at heart. I agree. I've never said that the sub should get what they wish. Only what they need. quote:
That doesn't entail giving in to my whims. A responsible leader knows the value of no and I wouldn't want that withheld to pacify my ego. Of course not. I've never said that, sorry if you interpreted it that way. What I said was (with the typo corrected) quote:
If what the dominant wants is to give the sub what they want, good for them. What I mean here is that the dominant giving you what you want doesn't make him any less in control. A good leader should know the value of yes too, and should not feel obligated to say no every time just to assert some kind of macho authority. Sometimes a dominant enjoys making the sub happy, and when that is the case, the sub is serving, simply by accepting that generosity and being happy. What he wants comes before what you want. But if, at any given time, what he wants is to give you something you want, (perhaps a gift, or satisfying a fantasy) then he's still getting what he wants.
|