ArtCatDom
Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn Well, meatcleaver obviously got the answer, but lets take this a step further. The United Stated is the world's current superpower ... a country would be very foolish not to spy on the United States. What is the legal way of acquiring a weapon of mass destruction? Is there a permit with a 30 day waiting period, or what? Is there is legal way to use military force on civilians? I understand the point you are making, and can't say that I disagree when you question the almost blind support of Israel by the United States ... but at the same time, that tends to be the nature of a military alliance, or one based on a powerful political lobby back at home. It just is, what it is. Multiple countries could be the "right" answer. Just depends on who fits the definition. As for WMDs, they can be developed in ways that do not violate treaties ratified by the developing country or partner countries. The primary nuclear treaty has an explicit mechanism for legally backing out. North Korea exploited it for example. There are plenty of lawful means of using military force on civilians. MPs involved in a peacekeeping force have every right and responsibility to exercise police powers to establish order, for example. Our blind support of Israel is disheartening. Our coddling of China just as much so. I do understand the political reality of it. Beyond even an alliance, Israel is a political third-rail in a lot of ways. Being anything vaguely antizionist leads shortly to accusations of antisemitic bias. Being even semi-successfully cast the racist is political death for all but the most well-connected and influential. The heavy influence of the downstate New York's political weight pushes for a pro-Israel position. The Rockefeller days are long gone, but it's still quite the political force to be reckoned with. Evangelical Christians are also a heavy weight on a pro-Israel position. Until someone offers reasonable alternatives for allies in the region, these influences are unlikely to be overcome these influences. Just as much, we're unlikely to stop treating Saudi Arabia with such friendly bias until we can find reasonable alternatives for regional allies and oil. I understand the situation, I just do not like it and would rather we build alternatives. *meow*
|