joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Fellow quote:
Just who? Just use Google. I do not want to initiate debate here. People who are against mainstream mantra (this is where the most funding is) face vicious attacks and smear campaigns. The fact is today's climate models are not adequate to make firm conclusions. And your conclusion is based on what evidence and facts? If you go and chat with scientists on climate change, you may find they disagree on different things; but the grand majority (those that disagree and not) point out that the concept of Climate Change seems to be the most reasonable explaination for the observations (and data collected to this point). It is impossible for those without scientific backgrounds to really grasp what the scientists are discussing/argueing. While it is in english, its in a wholly different language from 'laymens terms'. For instance, if you listen to a bunch of gamers talking about D&D, they will be using english for the most part, but the context of what they are talking about will be hard to follow. Even if you read a transcript of what they said, you'd understand the words, but not the meaning of those words together. Does that mean you understood the meaning of what was said? Scientists, metaphorically, operate the same way. Have you honest sat down, and let someone explain to you the concept of Climate Change (without a political 'bent' for or against)? Showed the evidence, and then say "How would you best explain all of this?". Saying 'I dont know', is not acceptable enough of a reply. If your going to rail the concept of Climate Change, then its up to you to explain your answer in a detail and mature manner. Otherwise, why should anyone take you seriously? Scientists have been gathering a wide range of information for years now. Used every manner of technology, making experiments and retesting concepts. There is peer review and post review of publications. The purpose of this, is to understand what the problem is, if any, and what can be done about it. The real problem with science, becomes understood quickly when trying to explain extremely complex concepts and language to people who just don't understand basic, high school physics/biology/chemistry. As much as I love hearing a good conspiracy theory; Climate Change isn't one of them. It is honestly very disappointing to know some Americans have a 'below minmal' understanding of science and engineering, even though they make use of its works everyday of their lives. That is to say, they dont understand how their cellphone works, it just does.
|