RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women

RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

DomYngBlk -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 4:21:04 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lazarus1983 quote: ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk quote: ORIGINAL: TreasureKY quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic One TRUE god given right that neanderthals are trying hard as hell to control, neanderthals thinkhaving money is the only way people should procreate. I could care less who procreates and who does not. I just don't like being held financially responsible for their decisions. Nice Christian attitude Do you own anything other than the clothes on your back? If so, why? Why have you not given them to the nearest charity? That's not very christian of you. :/ But then again, neither is judging others...hm, we're not doing so hot here... For one, never said I was christian. Others here point it out on a regular basis and hide behind it. Was my point. If you are going to say you are something then act like it. If you are selfish fuck..then say, I am a selfish fuck and want my shit....

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 4:26:52 PM)
I highly doubt that, but let's go with it. My argument is that you have a choice in giving something to someone else. No one else has any right to take it from you. Am I saying that giving is wrong? Not at all. I'm simply saying that it's a choice, not an obligation. You are not a selfless, voiceless, rightsless slave of any need, demand, or claim asserted by others.

DomYngBlk -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 4:43:47 PM)
And, as I said. Its a convenient excuse used by many many people. Just admit your selfish and would rather keep all your cash for you. Its ok. Its honest at least. Is the main problem with Republicans is that they just won't come out and admit it. If they did I'd have respect for them.

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 4:44:51 PM)
...I did. Check the previous page, near the bottom. Reading is fun-da-mental!

DomYngBlk -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 4:52:11 PM)
Nice to be right. thanks

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 4:54:08 PM)
There's a first time for everything. Now where's my jacket? You know, the one you initially didnt want to give me.

DomYngBlk -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:05:28 PM)
Need it that bad...you can have it.

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:08:08 PM)
You said that already. But I'm still curious why you didn't want to give it to me initially.

DomYngBlk -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:21:22 PM)
Didn't realize your need. Course you didn't indicate how bad it was for you

WhiteRae -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:22:44 PM)
Have you never done something or given to someone even if it didn't benefit you? What's wrong with helping people just because they need it? So according to your logic my dad, who worked for the same company for twenty years (including working a second job at some points), got laid off due to the company pulling out of the US, being unable to fund a job due to the economy for two years, then got one for about a year and got laid off again because of the economy. Are you saying that is all his fault? He went to Purdue. He had an education, he just had bad luck just like so many others because of the economy. So when my family couldn't always get by, it must be our fault.

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:24:54 PM)
So I must first tell you how bad off I am, before you give me charity? I must first meet your standard, before you help?

DomYngBlk -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:26:20 PM)
No, I helped....and added on as well..I just didnt know you desired the exact same jacket..Who knew?

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:28:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhiteRae Have you never done something or given to someone even if it didn't benefit you? What's wrong with helping people just because they need it? So according to your logic my dad, who worked for the same company for twenty years (including working a second job at some points), got laid off due to the company pulling out of the US, being unable to fund a job due to the economy for two years, then got one for about a year and got laid off again because of the economy. Are you saying that is all his fault? He went to Purdue. He had an education, he just had bad luck just like so many others because of the economy. So when my family couldn't always get by, it must be our fault. As I said, I give regularly to the American Red Cross. Have I ever been in a position where I've needed them? No. Does that meet your standard? And if you'll read my previous posts, I've never said there was anything wrong with helping people. Do you need directions to said post?

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:30:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk No, I helped....and added on as well..I just didnt know you desired the exact same jacket..Who knew? You should have known, because in my post I stated I wanted that jacket, referring to the one you had on. Reading comprehension skills slipping?

WhiteRae -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:34:32 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lazarus1983 As I said, I give regularly to the American Red Cross. Have I ever been in a position where I've needed them? No. Does that meet your standard? And if you'll read my previous posts, I've never said there was anything wrong with helping people. Do you need directions to said post? But you only give because it benefits you. You said so yourself. quote: I give regularly to the American Red Cross. Why? Because I've watched them in action, and I believe it's important to support that organization. Why? Because I believe it benefits me.

DomYngBlk -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:36:08 PM)
No, boring conversations where the person on the has lost the argument can't admit to it...and keeps on ,put me to sleep

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:39:35 PM)
And I also stated I've never had to use the Red Cross. So in your opinion, why would I state that it benefits me if I've never been in a situation that I needed it?

lazarus1983 -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:40:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DomYngBlk No, boring conversations where the person on the has lost the argument can't admit to it...and keeps on ,put me to sleep Well in that case explain to me, using examples taken from these posts, how I've lost, what I've lost, and what the argument is about, in your opinion?

DomYngBlk -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:45:45 PM)
Read back, Simple enough.

Aylee -> RE: Birth Control for Horses, Not for Women (2/20/2011 5:48:30 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhiteRae Have you never done something or given to someone even if it didn't benefit you? Nope. And that of course is because I do not deceive myself. That little warm-fuzzy feeling that I get when I do give to charity or whatnot IS a benefit to me.

Page: << < prev 2 3 [4] 5 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875