Proprietrix
Posts: 756
Joined: 7/15/2005 From: Ohio/West Virginia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: brokenmaleslave quote:
ORIGINAL: Proprietrix It seems to me if a male sexually submits to men, and has vanilla sex with women, wouldn't that just be bisexual. I have trouble with the concept of deliniating one's sexuality as "I'm gay under these circumstances, but straight under other circumstances." Why not just accept bisexuality? Because for me BDSM is not sexual, it is a way of life. i know and i accept i am submissive, even close to slave, but it is not limited by sexual appeal more, nature. I guess I was under the impression that you were submitting to men in a sexual manner. Maybe it's all in one's interpretation. I don't consider the typical "scene" sexual. (as in, tie someone to the cross, beat them with some toys, kind of scene.) Nor do I consider cleaning someone's house and running their errands sexual. However, I do consider kinky sex, strap-on usage, anal play, etc... sexual. If you're not submitting to them sexually, I guess I don't understand why sexuality would be in question in the first place. If you *are* submitting to them sexually, I'd probably stand by my original statement of accepting bisexuality. I don't know many (if any) men who identify themselves as straight, but would willingly allow another man to play with their jewels or go down on another man. Sorry if I misunderstood the original question.
_____________________________
IMO, IMHO, YMMV, AFAIK, to me, I see it as, from my perspective, it's been my experience, I only speak for myself, (and all other disclaimers here).
|