RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march

RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

luckydawg -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 7:13:02 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg RML..... http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/32007.pdf Libya has used chemical Weapons before. I am surprised you don't know that. But then lefties tend to ignore abuses by socialist monsters

PeonForHer -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 7:40:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Libya has used chemical Weapons before. I am surprised you don't know that. But then lefties tend to ignore abuses by socialist monsters What does 'RML' mean and what has Libya's use of chemical weapons got to do with my comment, Dawg? I was merely alluding to the fact that Bush's approval of the use of 'enhanced interrogation techniques' makes him a repulsive little turd, that's all.

jlf1961 -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 7:42:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Sure "The Obama administration has provided aid to the Libyan military, though in amounts that pale next to that provided to Egypt and Israel and other Mideast allies, increasing its request in the 2012 budget for military financing from $150,000 in fiscal year 2011 to $250,000. In 2010, the State Department requested $350,000 in International Military Education and Training funding for Libya to "support education and training of Libyan security forces, creating vital linkages with Libyan officers after a 35-year break in contact," according to a Congressional Research Service report. That same year, the administration also requested Foreign Military Financing assistance for Libya for the first time, with the goal of providing assistance to the Libyan Air Force in developing its air transport capabilities and to the Libyan Coast Guard in improving its coastal patrol and search and rescue operations. In 2009, the State Department gave Libya $500,000 for higher education, $300,000 for human rights, $500,000 for good governance and $200,000 for civil society programs. " http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/24/muammar-gaddafi-us-business-lobby_n_827769.html Okay, adding all that up it comes to $225000 dollars. Now consider how many millions have we given to other oppressive regimes.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 7:43:25 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Libya has used chemical Weapons before. I am surprised you don't know that. But then lefties tend to ignore abuses by socialist monsters What does 'RML' mean and what has Libya's use of chemical weapons got to do with my comment, Dawg? I was merely alluding to the fact that Bush's approval of the use of 'enhanced interrogation techniques' makes him a repulsive little turd, that's all. It means he was answering "rulemylife's" question. We call him RML for short on the boards. Hope that helps.

PeonForHer -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 7:48:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam What does 'RML' mean and what has Libya's use of chemical weapons got to do with my comment, Dawg? I was merely alluding to the fact that Bush's approval of the use of 'enhanced interrogation techniques' makes him a repulsive little turd, that's all. Ta, HW.

jlf1961 -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 7:51:48 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg RML..... http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/32007.pdf Libya has used chemical Weapons before. I am surprised you don't know that. But then lefties tend to ignore abuses by socialist monsters Actually, there is no record of Libya using chemical weapons in the past. All that is known is that one former Libyan minister said that chemical weapons may be used against the protesters. And for the record, Liberal have repeatedly condemned countries for using weapons of mass destruction. Talk about lies and false facts.

luckydawg -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 7:52:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg Sure "The Obama administration has provided aid to the Libyan military, though in amounts that pale next to that provided to Egypt and Israel and other Mideast allies, increasing its request in the 2012 budget for military financing from $150,000 in fiscal year 2011 to $250,000. In 2010, the State Department requested $350,000 in International Military Education and Training funding for Libya to "support education and training of Libyan security forces, creating vital linkages with Libyan officers after a 35-year break in contact," according to a Congressional Research Service report. That same year, the administration also requested Foreign Military Financing assistance for Libya for the first time, with the goal of providing assistance to the Libyan Air Force in developing its air transport capabilities and to the Libyan Coast Guard in improving its coastal patrol and search and rescue operations. In 2009, the State Department gave Libya $500,000 for higher education, $300,000 for human rights, $500,000 for good governance and $200,000 for civil society programs. " http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/24/muammar-gaddafi-us-business-lobby_n_827769.html Okay, adding all that up it comes to $225000 dollars. Now consider how many millions have we given to other oppressive regimes. Ya might want to check your math Jilf. You asked for proof that Obama was giving Libya money. "You mind showing proof of these "millions of Dollars" since in my search, there is nothing, so, like liberals on this board who do document claims, please do so. " You now have it. Though I was incorrect I should have said the "past few" years, not last.

jlf1961 -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 8:00:36 PM)
It was a typo dawg, I meant 2250000 dollars. Still there was a lot more money given to oppressive regimes under Republicans, such as some two term Republican President named Ronald Reagan, and it is historic fact that the US KNEW Iraq was using chemical weapons on the Iranians.

luckydawg -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 8:02:55 PM)
Yet, despite the evidence you are insisting that Libya did not use Poison gas in 85-87 in its war with Chad. and despite Mumar admitting he had Poison Gas, and him physically allowing it to be removed, you are insisting he didn't. I gave you the link already.

luckydawg -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 8:05:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 It was a typo dawg, I meant 2250000 dollars. Still there was a lot more money given to oppressive regimes under Republicans, such as some two term Republican President named Ronald Reagan, and it is historic fact that the US KNEW Iraq was using chemical weapons on the Iranians. So you meant to say, "Thank you for informing me of these facts I had not been aware of. As usuall you have taught me something new, and I will change my views accordingly" And I say to you, "You are welcome Jilf. I enjoy our honest disscussions"

Hillwilliam -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 8:10:25 PM)
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/167065.html It's a rumor but it appears that Dubya might not have made Quadaffi (or however the fuck he spells it) give up all his deadly toys.

luckydawg -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 8:13:59 PM)
let's hope thats not true, Hill. regardless, it is still better that he has less than he would have.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 8:17:30 PM)
I vote for him to be dancing under a lamp post with his feet off the ground before the day is out.

TheHeretic -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 8:49:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rulemylife People are being gunned down in the streets and you call it "good bipartisan policy". Or, people are being gunned down in the streets and you see a nice opportunity to turn it all into partisan bullshit with the opening words of your thread, RML. Irish Spring doesn't do well on that sort of stink. As for Kuhdaffy, the idea of seeing video of crowds dragging his body through the streets seems less awful all the time.

jlf1961 -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 9:23:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 It was a typo dawg, I meant 2250000 dollars. Still there was a lot more money given to oppressive regimes under Republicans, such as some two term Republican President named Ronald Reagan, and it is historic fact that the US KNEW Iraq was using chemical weapons on the Iranians. . So you meant to say, "Thank you for informing me of these facts I had not been aware of. As usuall you have taught me something new, and I will change my views accordingly" And I say to you, "You are welcome Jilf. I enjoy our honest disscussions" I like how you ignore the point about the Reagan Administration supplying arms, ammunition and a millions of dollars to Iraq during the Iran/Iraq war. And the fact the Reagan Administration KNEW that Iraq was using chemical weapons. I take it that the conservatives on this board feel that it was okay to use chemical weapons against Iran.

luckydawg -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 9:32:00 PM)
I don't know why not participating in an irrelevant hijack is considered acceptance of anything. Though I have seen realone use a similar tactic several times. What Regan did or didn't do has no bearing on whether Obama has given Mumar millions of dollars recently. If you want to talk about Regan start a thread on it. You challenged me for proof and I GAVE IT TO YOU. And you are too small to admit it.

jlf1961 -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 9:34:37 PM)
Actually I read the pdf file. It says absolutely NOTHING about Libya using the weapons, only that it HAD the weapons.

luckydawg -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 9:39:03 PM)
so you now acknowledge that Mumar did have Chem weopons, did use them, and gave them (new rumour perhaps just most) up under a deal worked out by Bush. And that Obama has given millions to gadaffi recently. That attempting to get Libya to stand down regarding terror and WMD was a good and usefull Bipartisan policy, engaged in by both Bush and Obama, is my point.

Arpig -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 9:49:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 Actually I read the pdf file. It says absolutely NOTHING about Libya using the weapons, only that it HAD the weapons. Actually it does: it says specifically: "Libya continues to deny any BW program, but its chemical weapons capability (including use of CW against Chad in the 1980s and" sorry but I am a stickler for details.

luckydawg -> RE: Protesters hit by hail of gunfire in Libya march (2/25/2011 9:59:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: jlf1961 quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg quote: ORIGINAL: luckydawg RML..... http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/32007.pdf Libya has used chemical Weapons before. I am surprised you don't know that. But then lefties tend to ignore abuses by socialist monsters Actually, there is no record of Libya using chemical weapons in the past. All that is known is that one former Libyan minister said that chemical weapons may be used against the protesters. And for the record, Liberal have repeatedly condemned countries for using weapons of mass destruction. Talk about lies and false facts. quote: Actually, there is no record of Libya using chemical weapons in the past. All that is known is that one former Libyan minister said that chemical weapons may be used against the protesters. And for the record, Liberal have repeatedly condemned countries for using weapons of mass destruction. Talk about lies and false facts. JIlff, "Libya continues to deny any BW program, but its chemical weapons capability (including use of CW against Chad in the 1980s and facilities at Rabta and Tarhuna) was well known." Thats from page 2 of the link I gave. There is in fact much more known that you admit. Yet I am not sure why you are arguing with me and the plain simple truth. Other than this being the line on MSNBC today? It is more persuasive when Rachel says it, and no one can point out what utter shit it is.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 5 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875