RE: Freud would be amused (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message

GreedyTop -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 5:54:45 AM)

ok, I was not an English major, but aren't clauses separated by the i./ii./iii things?



Phoenixpower -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/29/2011 6:03:55 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Mods: would you please move this back to random stupidity, where it belongs? Just because some idiot thinks he talks to and for some god doesn't make it about religion.


DUH...[8|] men like their politics so its quite right in here [:D] So naaaah, we ain't taking it back [:)]




BenevolentM -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 6:07:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
The point I am making is none of you are reading for comprehension...

If you're going to make statements like that, the blather about form and function looks a bit like a bluff, I'm afraid.


And you are a dumb shit too. It is blatant that you are full of it and Kirata is full of it. All I needed to do is provide a strong clue. A colon is not a weak clue. English does not conform to strict precedence rules. The clue was sufficiently strong. It is also clear that your actions and his are disingenuous. Kirata has a clear motive.



Phoenixpower -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/29/2011 6:07:14 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

Let me begin by saying that I am a straight Dominant male. I am also one of the most extraordinary individuals who have ever lived. Yet, I am without a soul mate. Few men could ever claim to be my equal. Yet, I know what it is to be lonely and I have been abused by women. What I am saying is that if you are unloved, I too know what it is to be unloved.

The topic of this thread is how to preserve you for that special someone.


My suggestion is to perhaps enroll yourself in some counselling sessions with a good therapist (perhaps a kink-aware one) and see if that person can help you discover where the disconnect is between you and the rest of the world. If you are as extraordinary as you say (and I could never judge that not to be so) then something must be getting lost in the translation somewhere.
The right therapist could help you carve a map on getting from where you are now: unloved and lonely to where you want to be --> w/ soulmate.


Or you could attend knitting- or pottery classes [:)]



Phoenixpower -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 6:08:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
English does not conform to strict precedence rules.


Now...seriously, thats something new to me...as I learned over here these these folks lubs to follow their rules and regulations [8|][:'(]



tweakabelle -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/29/2011 6:28:47 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

I'm starting to wonder if it's wrong of me to find this thread amusing. It's increasingly resembling a day out to Bedlam, isn't it?


Reading the thread, I had the same feeling I had during the scene in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest when all the inmates went off fishing for the day ......



Kirata -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 6:32:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: GreedyTop

ok, I was not an English major, but aren't clauses separated by the i./ii./iii things?

Well, a clause is simply a construct that contains a subject and a predicate. For example, a simple sentence consists of a single independent clause. But if you are going to use a colon followed by a series of independent clauses, you must either join them using semicolons or set them forth in an enumeration (e.g., as per your question). Otherwise, any relationship to the clause preceding the colon terminates at the first period.

Or at least, that's as I remember it. It's been a long time. [:D]

K.



GreedyTop -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 6:54:00 AM)

thank you :)

(how I got an A in my AP English class in college is beyond me.. LOL)



Moonhead -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 7:15:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
English does not conform to strict precedence rules. The clue was sufficiently strong.

No question that English is the free jazz next to the rigid twelve bars that characterise the rest of the Germanic languages, but there are still plenty of inflexible grammatical rules. Punctuation is one of them (and, due to the absence of word order and gender tenses in English, plays a very important role in structuring this language). I'd suggest that you check that "clause" means what you think it does as well, while you're doing some of that research stuff as well. The definition to do with sentence construction is pretty different to the legal one.

(Buggery: Kirata's beaten me to the draw on that...)



BenevolentM -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 7:21:39 AM)

Many here seriously underestimate my understanding of formal languages. English is not a formal language. If anyone can't understand that they are seriously uneducated. Enough said. Please, do not embarrass yourselves any further.



sunshinemiss -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 7:24:35 AM)

What makes a language "formal" versus "informal"? Certainly there is formal and informal language (not A language, just different ways of speaking within a language). Some languages are very clear about that with certain word endings and such used to differentiate levels of deference. But what makes A language formal versus informal?

*Sorry if this has been answered, I'm not about to read 42 pages.

best,
sunshine



Kirata -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 7:25:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

(Buggery: Kirata's beaten me to the draw on that...)

Aye, on that to the draw beaten you Kirata has. [:D]

Kirata the Jedi



Moonhead -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 7:28:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
English is not a formal language.

I'd love to hear your justification for that one.
(This'll be good...)



BenevolentM -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/29/2011 7:36:04 AM)

The Annunciation is the first of the Joyful Mysteries. Our Holy Mother did not share with me a Sorrowful Mystery. She shared with the first of the Joyful Mysteries. Ask yourself, what brings the greatest joy to God? By answering this question you will know something of the prophecy.

Glory Be to God Almighty



Moonhead -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/29/2011 7:38:01 AM)

We call that "changing the subject" where I come from, mate.



BenevolentM -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 7:38:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
English is not a formal language.

I'd love to hear your justification for that one.
(This'll be good...)


I don't have to. You're an idiot. God does not call us to be idiots.



poise -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/29/2011 7:40:27 AM)

The Bible Of BenevolentM


[image]local://upfiles/1031783/81E6F47F0317498F9922DEF6E8911622.jpg[/image]



Moonhead -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 7:44:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead
quote:

ORIGINAL: BenevolentM
English is not a formal language.

I'd love to hear your justification for that one.
(This'll be good...)


I don't have to. You're an idiot. God does not call us to be idiots.

Nope. I didn't think you had a prayer of backing that one up.



GreedyTop -> RE: Freud would be amused (3/29/2011 8:02:09 AM)

*adores poise*

BM.. I think this bit pretty much sums up all you have said...  (substitute most all of your assertions for the word 'inconceivable'): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk



susie -> RE: A Guide for Dominant Men: How to Preserve Yourself (3/29/2011 8:33:22 AM)

  Never mind. Post removed because I cannot be bothered with someone who does not understand English even at the most basic level.



Page: <<   < prev  40 41 [42] 43 44   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875