Mavis -> RE: Can integrity be taught? (5/6/2006 12:21:01 PM)
|
i think there is much you can do with your charges in this area. i think of it more as integrity awareness than teaching integrity. If we take the view that "integrity" is defined as integrating actions, attitudes, and behaviors with our core values, almost everyone actually has integrity. We regularly act in accordance with our values. The problem is there is a hierarchy of values that changes depending on which realm we are operating in. (not exactly situational ethics, as that implies. please bear with me.) for example, we almost all have these two values.. 1) I want to BE a nice / good person. 2) I want to be SEEN as a nice/ good person. #1 applies with our friends, family, people we truly care about. #2 applies at work maybe, or on the bus, or at a munch, to use KoMs example. Operating on # 2 is why we may say "Nice to see you." at munch, when we're really not at all thrilled about a certain person. Operating on # 1 with best friend is why we can say "orange is definately not your color.", once we've decided the best thing for that friend is brutal honesty and is therefore a "good" thing to do. An observer who is paying close attention to model your behaviors, (your child, your submissive, an apprentice of sorts, etc) will notice and question the conflicting standards of honesty vs deception. And even question how it applies to them.. "If I know mommy hates the dress grandma gave her, but mommy said it was very nice, did she also hate the picture I drew that she said was very nice?" So, back to training a sub, you create ample opportunities for sub to really analyze their internal values structure, or as you instill yours, then check their behaviors against this list. You can create an awareness in them of which values get the highest priorities, and if the automatic response to a situation actually reflected the Real importance of that particular value. In this way You as a D. or M. can influence the "integration" of behavior to values, and the actual hierarchy of those values. Most good D/ or M do that already; "was (-- blank behavior or attitude --) in accordance with what you know to be My standards?" If not, it shows a place where the subs values have not been replaced by the D or M values, and there is still a choice conflict. Most internal training is swapping out subs/ slaves standards for Dominants / Masters standards. IMHO, you start by getting the sub/ trainee aware of their values system.. then aware of the new values to adopt, then aware of Which we believe more. a sub may believe these two things: 1) My goal is to make D or M happy. 2) My goal is to obey D or M. Now, when sub disobeys, does he or she confess, to address value # 2 Or hide it, to address value # 1 , because confession will surely not make Master happy. Ah! If Master has made clear that obedience is more important than making Master happy at all costs, then sub knows which to choose. or if Master has made clear that honesty is what makes Master happy, should we then disobey to confess and make Master happy ? LOL. Training us in the hierarchy of Your priorities and charging us with constantly evaluating how what we think / do applies to the standards we claim we want to adopt to please our One... now there ya go. When You do this, You are teaching us the integrity we want, the integration of your values and our behaviors. yum. ~offered humbly to share one of my favorite topics. P.S. here is a great link on integrity from stanford... http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/integrity/
|
|
|
|