LillyBoPeep
Posts: 6873
Joined: 12/29/2010 Status: offline
|
this is a really interesting topic, stella ^_^ i think exploitation of anything is bound to happen after it becomes kinda popular. our culture has sorta become an "instantgratificationpalooza," so people are always on the hunt for the next "thing" that they think will totally change their lives or get them everything they want. i imagine everyone can think of a few examples of the way people use BDSM/"the lifestyle" to do that. I agree with you that we're in a period of cultural decline. i also think, though, that people involved in BDSM believe in some sort of "standards," though -- kinky people still have a sense of right and wrong, so if you ask them "i'd really like to try doing X," X might literally scare a kinky person (especially on a place like CM where everyone isn't into the same things as everyone else), and they aren't always afraid to say it. or they have had experience with it, the experience was bad, and they're relaying it. there are also people who are super-invested into the way BDSM/power exchange is perceived, and they become the "safety police," in order to try to keep people from doing things that they believe will harm an already "complex" perception. i think sometimes people falsely assume that kinky people are or even HAVE to be more "open" than "vanilla" people, and i don't really think that's true because kinky people are still regular people. openness doesn't mean that you allow for everything (at least not to me) -- it means that you have an open mind and give everything thought and consideration without having a knee-jerk reaction. you may still disagree with it, but you've at least spent some time thinking about it. i think a lot of the people who say "that sounds bad" actually fall into that category. ---- In marginalizing others, how much do we marginalize ourselves? i imagine once you create the room for, or play into a system of marginalization, you create/sustain a situation where other people are able to define their own criteria for doing it, too, and so you could wind up being marginalized. i think "treat others how you want to be treated" is a great idea. How much do you feel negative traumatic experiences in life and emotional issues influence your interests and interactions and if they exist, how do they relate to one another? i prefer not to think they relate to each other at all. You meet someone who you feel is good potential for a relationship, but they either have a significant emotional issue or are dealing with a major problem in life. How would that affect your decision over whether to get to know them or not? it wouldn't affect my wanting to get to know them; i guess the important thing is how it's dealt with. is it treated like a crutch/ a justification for every bad decision or experience they have? are they being proactive and positive in their approach or letting it swallow them? people have hard times, and emotions and confusions and such -- that's part of the joy/pain of being a human being. sometimes we make bad choices and have consequences that follow us -- sometimes those consequences help us become better people along the way. Have you ever found yourself in unfortunate circumstances and/or having serious issues and had someone overlook them and continue to get to know you? Was there any relationship between that relationship and you overcoming your circumstances? What happened? when i met M, i had just moved, didn't have a car, and was living in a hotel. =p he took that as "stuff that would change," and made me feel comfortable with who i was at the time, and that those things weren't really any part of the person i was deep down. i got a car, which meant i could see him more often. =p he was also a pretty heavy smoker and wanted to quit. voicing his troubles with quitting didn't make me see him negatively; humans struggle from time to time. i don't expect people to be perfect, not even Dominants. Have you ever avoided entering relationships or have isolated yourself because of circumstances? Why? I avoided entering relationships after M died -- at first, because i couldn't feel, and then secondly, because i went through a period of horrendous rebound. i wanted "my life back" and i would get inordinately attached to people i really SHOULDN'T. on top of that, i still wasn't able to really feel anything, and i didn't want to push that onto someone else -- if i'd ran out and gotten involved with anyone, they'd have been living in his shadow, big time, and i didn't believe that was fair. nowadays (in june it will be 2 years) i admit that i can have feelings for others, that i sometimes DO have feelings for others, that i DO want life to go on, etc -- sometimes i worry that people hear/read me talking about M and think that that means that i can't be open and fully love them (i think a lot of men are extremely territorial and it becomes a problem there). but hey, i still talk about my aunt who died in 97. i talk about and miss people (and animals =p) who had a really great effect on me, because that made me who i am, and shaped my opinions and beliefs. i had a great first-timer's experience with WIITWD thanks to a really wonderful, level-headed guy, and i feel comfortable coming back because he helped me see it as a positive, natural thing for me. on top of that, he was a good friend, and shared a lot of wonderful philosophy with me, and i don't see any of that as "bad" to carry along. so at this point in my life, i can admit i'm open to something happening, but if it doesn't, it won't kill me. What do you pay attention to when getting to know someone? What are your dealbreakers? Red flags? i pay attention to the way a person thinks, and what his intellectual interests are. i figure if we can spend a regular day together without getting bored of each other, then we're on the right track. i think you can be bored together, but when you become bored of a person, there's a problem. i have a bad habit of falling in love with brains. one of my red flags is constant inconsistency; saying one thing and doing another is one of my biggest pet peeves. How have socio-economic factors in your community impacted or affected how people go about WIITWD? What developments or changes have you yourself noticed? Are these changes positive or detrimental to WIITWD as a whole? one of the biggest factors is going to group events. i'm on the fundraising committee for one group, and it's sometimes hard to keep attendance numbers up and keep a bank of funds with the economy making life hard for people. =p if someone only has $20, he's going to put that in his gas tank, rather than spend it on an event that isn't vital to his survival. socially, NE isn't the most accepting state on earth, either, so people are very secretive here. we don't have big public figures here who put their faces on every kink event, because people here are very conservative and worried about losing jobs, losings friends, losing religious ties, etc etc. on top of that, we have pretty HORRIBLE poverty among minority groups here, so you often don't see them. even if they are interested in BDSM, they can't generally afford to come to events and socialize/learn. i'm battling my way through college with a bunch of part-time/seasonal jobs; sometimes i can't justify the cost to myself, either. =p ESPECIALLY when the stuff that's really important to me, like power exchange, doesn't seem to be important to most of the people i meet. plus, i'm usually one of between 1-3 brown-skinned people at events here, which comes with its own host of "issues," hence the "anti-raceplay" disclaimer on my profile.
_____________________________
Midwestern Girl "Obey your Master." Metallica
|