Anaxagoras
Posts: 3086
Joined: 5/9/2009 From: Eire Status: offline
|
To quote an extract from the McCain article: quote:
“He (President Obama) waited too long, there is no doubt in my mind about it. But now, it is what it is,” McCain said in an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union” taped Friday. “We need now to support him and the efforts that our military are going to make. And I regret that it didn’t – we didn’t act much more quickly, and we could have.” The ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee said if the United States had acted a couple weeks ago, before the United Nations issued a cease-fire, a no-fly zone “would probably have been enough” to prevent the situation in the African country from deteriorating. To be honest I don’t see what was so terrible about what McCain said. I personally thought the invasion a bad idea because it would be misinterpreted, especially in the aftermath of the hostility in the Islamic world caused by the US invasion of Iraq but in essence all McCain said was that it should have been done sooner so that Gadfly’s military gains could have been avoided. From my perspective, it is fair to say that if action was to be taken, it could have been taken sooner. The comment about America’s strength seems more to do with his confidence the mission would succeed. He was nuts to involve Palin but generally I like the fact McCain has the ability to put aside narrow party politics such as here where he voices support for Obama now that conflict has been initiated. People on the left and the right have been advocating earlier intervention by the US so I don’t think this can be seen as harm to the republican party given the above. quote:
ORIGINAL: DarkSteven What concerns me far more is that the Arab League is starting to waffle already and is acting like they didn't really sign up for this. True, it should have been clear that enforcing a no fly zone would require some strikes, especially after the gains Gaddafi made, and the continued use of air power after he declared a ceasefire but judging by the League's criticism, they are acting as if all civilian casualties could have been avoided. I think the Arab League is playing politics, perhaps out of necessity. They may have a concern that the coalition forces will go further than enforce a no fly zone, in which it may begin to resemble Iraq Redux to many Muslims in the region. This could have a big effect on the popularity of League members because in time they could be increasingly seen as pro-West, which would further destabilise the region and play into the hands of extremist regimes like Iran that have criticised them as thus in the past. There seems a lot to loose especially given present instability thoughtout the ME.
< Message edited by Anaxagoras -- 3/21/2011 8:26:03 AM >
|