RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


FriendlyMuppet -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/23/2011 2:47:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

  I'm sure that ratio tends to go up if people don't take you seriously in the first place.


That, to me, is probably the most significant line of all. Personally, I don't give the time of day to the majority of the professionals on this site (mainly because most I've run across tend to be the lower level of the professional crowd anyway, although a few exceptions to stick out), but the main reason for that happens to be just because of the serious factor. When someone laughs at a pro dommes site before he even thinks of "serving" the odds are pretty good that there's not going to be a lot of respect changing hands from the first contact and conversation.

And like others have pointed out as well, the people to whom the OP's missive should be directed at aren't the ones who actually participate in the forums anyway, so I"m not sure what purpose she's attempting to serve, unless it's just to gripe and get a complaint off of one's chest.




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/23/2011 2:58:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YSG
LNT, I get your point, and to an extent, I agree about a certain level of "male entitlement". However, I wouldnt put trying to get a free session on the same level as rape.


Not at all.  But the kinds of solicitations sent to profiles that are clearly marked "friends only" or "lesbian women only" or "professional transactions only" are definitely on the same level as flashing or sexual harassment, to the point that the behavior would actually be illegal and arrest-worthy were it done in real life. Nonconsensual sexual behavior directed at women is not always rape, to be sure, but that doesn't make it even remotely okay or justifiable.  And it worries me when people do try to justify it.  The problem people are *not* just politely asking to play, they're being a lot cruder and more explicit than that, to the point that I'd classify a lot of it as hardcore sexual aggression that very quickly turns into rage and even threats of violence if the answer is no.


quote:

However, coming onto a forum like this and having a temper tantrum like a 3 year old (not to mention the nasty email she sent me) is not the solution. Block and delete would, in my opinion, be a far better one.


Probably.  It's kind of pointless to type stuff for people who you already know are not going to bother reading anything you write.  They don't read profiles, and they don't read the forums either, because they are not here to have normal two-way social contact with other human beings.  The only approach that is effective is to ignore, block and delete.




kalikshama -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/23/2011 3:03:23 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ChatteParfaitt

No question, just an advertisement. Business slow in Dallas these days?


Yes, we can count on DommeKeliDallas to start a provocative thread monthly.




stellauk -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 12:13:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

I disagree. I'm all for "suck it up" and it has nothing to do with male entitlement. It has to do with the realities of running a business -- any business. I have yet to run a business where the customers didn't try to get something for nothing. I see it as my job to clearly set expectations up front and enforce boundaries as required. If I ran a paper store and someone came in and asked, "Will you give me a free ream of paper if I buy one?" I wouldn't think anything of that. I'd answer the question and move on. If they browsed around in the store taking up my time asking questions for endless hours then left without buying anything I'd also think nothing of that. These are both very normal business scenarios.

Your tossing of the "male entitlement" flag is pretty cheap. Nazi's next?



I disagree with the bolded part even though on principle I agree with what you wrote in the paragraph above.

It's not quite the same as running your own business, simply because what is on offer carries a certain degree of intimacy between pro-domme and client, and it's not quite the same intimacy as you find in say, a doctor-patient relationship because the intimacy is associated with feelings of arousal, excitement, pleasure and satisfaction.

That perceived sense of privilege is not exclusive to men, but it also applies to women, and it comes from placing too much importance to one's gender, attachment to beliefs in rigid gender stereotypes, reinforced in various ways, by the media, by peer contact, even by past experiences and religious or spiritual beliefs, and it leads to inappropriate attitudes, assumptions and behaviour which crosses the boundaries of what is socially appropriate behaviour.

We can see it very clearly here with both genders 'duking it out' trying to justify and defend those rigidly held beliefs in the importance of gender and confirmation of these stereotypes. In reality they exist nowhere else but in the minds of those who are either still fighting or who have become casualties in the ongoing war between men and women.

The OP seems to be posting from a position that all or most men are 'pervy', out for their own gratification at the expense of others, are coming online looking for a cheap thrill, and are generally unfit to be relationship material. This I feel is why some pro-dommes become pro-dommes, they want something back for what they are putting into it, and the only way they can see getting something back is to hit the guy in his wallet and demand payment. It's not that much different from younger women offering 'online domination' and looking for 'paypiggies' to top of their cellphone and make online purchases. It's not business, it's exploitation.

But it cuts both ways, and there are lots of men out there who equate professional domination with prostitution, who feel that any pro-domme who is available is available to them (some are way more extreme and don't differentiate between a pro-domme and a woman) and they are there purely for their gratification, whether it be sexual, emotional, kink-related or whatever. There's very little discrimination, any domme will do, not much thinking, no consideration, no tact, no regard in any way for the feelings of the pro-domme, no appreciation of what she offers, her time, her investment, or anything else. It's all about them, all the time, and they can get very pissy or downright nasty and abusive when it doesn't go their way. Like the above it's not business, it's not BDSM, it's nothing other than exploitation.

All around them the world carries on as normal, people fall in and out of love, people meet, discuss, friendships, are formed, as are relationships, lots of men are happy in their jobs, have loving families, and take time and care to find the right arrangement with the right pro-domme for the right price and nobody bats an eyelid. The pro-domme takes the rough with the smooth, she filters out the timewasters, pays attention to her red flags, meets her clients, earns her money, and nobody is none the wiser. Some pro-dommes don't even need sites like Collarme or IC or Fet, they have their networks, their regulars, their websites, and life goes on.

But generally speaking these people with the attachment to rigid gender stereotypes don't see it, they're too much absorbed with the pursuit of pleasure or looking for opportunities to make a quick buck, life has become one of constant misery and disappointment punctuated with times of gratification, they don't question their thinking or attitudes so are not looking for the positives, but they can never fail to notice the negatives and it serves as further justification for their stereotypical beliefs and distorted perception of life, other people and the world around them. They are trapped in a world of illusion of their own making, it's more about what 'should' be and not what is, and they get so incensed when they see the other side gain what they perceive to be an unfair advantage.

Life isn't easy as a victim, especially when you lack the insight and integrity to see things for what they are and to shoulder some of the responsibility yourself for the way things stand. Life is always going to be unfair and unjust if you see the problem being other people and are looking round for others to blame.

But we know that which is why we see it as something pointless and the starting of such threads as a waste of time and effort. It's telling us something we already know, we've been there, gone through the rights of passage and worn the T-shirt. It's important not to get sucked in to the conflict and to understand that maybe, if someone has such a distorted perception of life and people due to an unhealthy attachment to rigidly held gender stereotypes, there's nothing much you can do and telling them to suck it up, expressing sympathy, or trying to point out the reality isn't going to achieve much but leaving you open to hostility, drama and bad karma.

The only thing you can do is to smile sweetly, say 'yes yes my dear' and leave them to work it out for themselves... eventually.




SexyBossyBBW -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 12:57:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer
That is a valid perspective.  So is mine; there really *is* a culture of male entitlement that basically says you can't rape a whore; once a woman has given up the protection of chaste "nice girl" status she is free game for any kind of sexual harassment or even sexual violence. 

I really do think there is some of that going on here.  Women on adult sites are told that if they don't want to be sent dick pictures or explicitly sexual invitations, they shouldn't be on adult sites at all.  The consequence to that is basically to reinforce the idea that if she's not a nice girl who stays within the approved cultural boundaries of limited sexual expression, she is no longer allowed any personal boundaries and it's okay to stick your dick in her face.  Personally I think it is a better idea to educate guys that just because a woman is out there in the BDSM community, regardless of her reasons for being there, it does NOT make it okay not to respect her personal sexual boundaries.

A good analogy is if you told lesbians that they should stay the hell away from the greater BDSM community if they couldn't handle being rudely propositioned or groped by men.  Sorry, but that is not the answer.  The answer is to set standards of reasonable behavior so that everyone feels safe and welcome.  If you fail to do that, IMO you are failing the community itself.
Lovely post, if anyone is paying attention, from a grown up perspective.

Furthermore, (IMHO), There ought not be an implication, that those of us who aren't pro, are superior, simply because we don't charge them upfront, and wait until a relationship ensues. M




GreedyTop -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 1:00:03 AM)

~FR~

oh. its kelli again.  *yawn*




LadyPact -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 3:24:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SexyBossyBBW
Lovely post, if anyone is paying attention, from a grown up perspective.

Furthermore, (IMHO), There ought not be an implication, that those of us who aren't pro, are superior, simply because we don't charge them upfront, and wait until a relationship ensues. M

It's not that it's a bad post.  I did see it as a bit too much.  Basically, the rant was directed at time wasters, which everybody deals with.  I just can't make the leap to rape or sexual harassment.  It's not the same kind of severity so let's not get carried away.

The site does allow for advertising of pro services, promoting events, products, paying membership websites, phone lines, and other things that I'm sure that I'm forgetting.  It is a source of free advertising.  Whether the yield from that advertising is worth the time invested in such is up for debate.  I'm a bottom line kind of person.  If not one dime was spent to use the site, but one customer came through using CM it was financial profit.  The time that anyone spent doing so was completely what they chose to invest.

Now, I'm the first to say that if a person reads a profile and it is not what they are looking for or they do not fit what the person has to say in it....... Move on!  That goes for pros who are only here looking for clients,  people who list an age range, folks who are interested in being contacted by local folks only, no married folks, no online only folks, or any other thing.

At the same time, pro or not pro, we have so much control over who we are willing to spend our time on.  About a month ago, I revamped My profile.  It is now focused only on local events and the relationships that I already have.  In conjunction with the spam filter, I am now experiencing the least amount of crap/time wasting email that I have in My four year history on CM.  I don't deal with people who aren't local to Me (unless they are from the forums) and I bet the OP could do the same.




YSG -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 3:55:06 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyNTrainer
Not at all.  But the kinds of solicitations sent to profiles that are clearly marked "friends only" or "lesbian women only" or "professional transactions only" are definitely on the same level as flashing or sexual harassment, to the point that the behavior would actually be illegal and arrest-worthy were it done in real life. Nonconsensual sexual behavior directed at women is not always rape, to be sure, but that doesn't make it even remotely okay or justifiable.  And it worries me when people do try to justify it.  The problem people are *not* just politely asking to play, they're being a lot cruder and more explicit than that, to the point that I'd classify a lot of it as hardcore sexual aggression that very quickly turns into rage and even threats of violence if the answer is no.


Just remember... block and delete. Now, question. Is it ok for this behavior to be pointed towards men? I ask this, because I have a pair of nasty letters from the OP in my inbox. So, does it make her actions OK because Im a man?

Honestly, I think you're making too big a deal out of one moron getting ticked about other morons.




LadyPact -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 4:18:02 AM)

Wow.  I actually can't remember the last time I said this twice in one week.

The behavior isn't allowed to be directed towards My men.  I'd cut that shit to the quick so fast that somebody's head would spin.

Block the crap now, because I told you to.

Edited for fast flying fingers.




YSG -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 4:22:53 AM)

Oh, I already blocked the idiot, LP. However, I'll gladly un-block, then re-block if you like [:D]




LadyPact -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 4:29:40 AM)

As is will be fine. 

I'll just wait to see what happens the next time I give you a command.  [;)]




YSG -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 4:41:13 AM)

hmm.... should I be excited or frightened? Both seem like a viable feeling right now [8D]




LadyPact -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 4:57:31 AM)

That will depend entirely on what the next command will be, won't it?  [8D]  Time will tell.

I may not have conveyed it well on this thread.  I don't condone the abuse of anyone.  At the same time, anyone using this site has the power.  Kind of like what you did.




VaguelyCurious -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 4:58:26 AM)

You two are adorable.

*runs away and hides before Lady P can hurt me [8D]*




LadyPact -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 5:06:19 AM)

Is that an offer?  Mawhahahaha.  [sm=mistress.gif]




JstAnotherSub -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 5:50:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DommeKeliDallas

If a woman on CM has a profile stating that she is a PRO DOMME, it means that she is EXPECTING COMPRNSATION of some kind.
If you reply to her, KNOW this and don't waste your time or hers by trying to get her to change her mind and give you a free session.

You will just be frustrated that you can't get your pervy needs met and you will also tick her off by wasting her time.

Many subs before you have been "leg-humpers" wanting the same thing you have.

A Pro Domme wants men who APPRECIATE HER and will SHOW HER in person with gifts that they VALUE her for helping them achieve their subspace.


Yeah Keli, no one but the poor pro dommes ever get time wasting mail from morons that don't bother to read profiles...

[8|]




Arieno -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 7:32:07 AM)

quote:

Yeah Keli, no one but the poor pro dommes ever get time wasting mail from morons that don't bother to read profiles...


Well I am kind of new to this site, (a month or so) but received over 12 invitations from pros to visit their sites within the first two days. I re-wrote my profile insuring nothing in my profile implied suggested or alluded to an interest in business transactions or the exchanging of dollars for services… but I still get e-mail from pros.




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 7:40:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: JstAnotherSub
Yeah Keli, no one but the poor pro dommes ever get time wasting mail from morons that don't bother to read profiles...

[8|]


Actually I get far less yuck-mail on my current professional profile than I formerly received on my open, friendly but "seeking friends only" profile.  Go figure.




GreedyTop -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 8:01:41 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arieno

quote:

Yeah Keli, no one but the poor pro dommes ever get time wasting mail from morons that don't bother to read profiles...


Well I am kind of new to this site, (a month or so) but received over 12 invitations from pros to visit their sites within the first two days. I re-wrote my profile insuring nothing in my profile implied suggested or alluded to an interest in business transactions or the exchanging of dollars for services… but I still get e-mail from pros.


You're new.  teh invites may or may not die down after a bit.  Dont take it to heart.  That is just the way the "cyber, not for real, PROS (koff)' work.  Plus youre new meat so you'll get shitloads of emails from people that dont fit your designated parameters.

Ignore, block, delete.
*edited cause I haz teh sleepy, and teh fingers is sleepier*




LadyNTrainer -> RE: Pro Domme and Profiles... (3/24/2011 8:46:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: YSG
Is it ok for this behavior to be pointed towards men? I ask this, because I have a pair of nasty letters from the OP in my inbox. So, does it make her actions OK because Im a man?


Not having read the letters, I have absolutely no idea if "nasty" constitutes rude disagreement on a topic, unwelcome sexual or personal harassment, or actual threats on your physical person.  I'm inclined to place disagreement on a topic, however rude, in the protected free speech category.  So is the law in most jurisdictions.  It's the latter two categories that are recognized as violating another person's rights. 


quote:

Honestly, I think you're making too big a deal out of one moron getting ticked about other morons.


Kelli will be Kelli, and never the sharpest crayon in the drawer.  But the topic is a valid one.  It is not okay to subject someone to sexual harassment.  It is also not okay to trivialize a very real problem that women face on adult sites by comparing it to being asked for free reams of paper, or saying that complaining about it is equivalent to being a Nazi. 

It's equally wrong if women do it to men, or if men do it to men, or if women do it to women.....but the reality is that the overwhelming majority of what can reasonably be classed as sexual harassment on adult sites is male to female.  And the attitude most people have toward it is "suck it up, she was asking for it by being on an adult site in the first place."

This type of disrespect for a woman's right to set personal boundaries on her participation in sexual activity - specifically, her right to say that it is okay to do this with her but not that and to have that respected - is not a good thing.  If a woman comes to an adult site and states that she is here seeking friends only, or lesbians only, or professional transactions only, and she does not consent to engage in explicitly sexual interactions outside her parameters, a reasonable response is *not* that she should "suck it up" when someone runs up and shoves his dick in her face.  The meme here is that she should suck it up because she was asking for it and should have expected it, because men cannot be expected to control themselves.  Social expectations are laid on the women to either put up with it or to hide from it, not on the men to stop the behavior.  A woman who strays outside "nice girl" boundaries is considered fair game for sexual behavior directed at her, whether she consents or not. 

Seriously.  Do you really not hear the echo of "but she was asking for it by being dressed like that?"  Cyber-crudity is not rape, but it is nonconsensual sexual behavior directed at women.  And more often than you think, it really does cross the line to threats of violence.  The rage and frustration and aggression in them can be overwhelming. 

Yes, I do see the "suck it up, you were asking for it by being on an adult site" meme as a real and serious problem for the online BDSM community.  The message you are sending women is "You must tolerate unwanted male sexual aggression if you want to participate in our community.  You can not set your personal boundaries of consent and expect to have them respected here.  Any woman who comes here is fair game and should expect to be sexually harassed.  So shut up and suck it up, or we'll call you a Nazi for complaining."

That's not a good message, people.  Think about it.

Changing the message to put the social expectations on the men to stop the nonconsensual behavior rather than on the women to "suck it up" if they want to participate at all on adult sites is not going to be an immediate fix, but it is a step in the right direction.




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875