Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama

Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

DarkSteven -> Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 6:58:34 AM)
http://news.yahoo.com/s/theweek/20110324/cm_theweek/213461 Ginmgirs could have enforced a no-fly zone immediately, as long as Obama didn't. As soon as Obama did, Gingrich decided that he would never have done it. Adultery is wrong if a Dem does it, military action is wrong if a Dem does it...

mnottertail -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:00:47 AM)
Yeah, their fall line-up looks pretty fuckin weak, won't even run past the pilot episode for most of them out there, wonder who is gonna end up taking one for the gipper. Cuz that's what it is.

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:11:11 AM)
You know what the right has that the left doesnt have steven? Our candidates get vetted by the media. Chances are that by the time the primaries are in full swing we will know exactly who each Republican candidate is, we will know what he or she stands for, and we will know if there are any insane Jeremiah Wrights barking away in their closets. And thats a plus for us. quote: ORIGINAL: DarkSteven http://news.yahoo.com/s/theweek/20110324/cm_theweek/213461 Ginmgirs could have enforced a no-fly zone immediately, as long as Obama didn't. As soon as Obama did, Gingrich decided that he would never have done it. Adultery is wrong if a Dem does it, military action is wrong if a Dem does it...

flcouple2009 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:18:33 AM)
So your saying the Republican Party is not capable of vetting out the liars and hypocrites themselves?

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:23:41 AM)
Thats not what I wrote at all. quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 So your saying the Republican Party is not capable of vetting out the liars and hypocrites themselves?

mnottertail -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:25:09 AM)
What you wrote wasn't accurate either.

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:28:30 AM)
Besides board legend youre appointing yourself judge of all things as well, now? At this rate you will be God almighty by this evening, at the latest. quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail What you wrote wasn't accurate either.

mnottertail -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:31:29 AM)
You had a witch made it way past the primaries, you had an unvetted ignorant cunt up for VP; there's more..... It does not require a divine nature to divine that you are wholly inaccurate in your statements, per usual. Odin, the one eyed god of war and confusion.

flcouple2009 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:31:57 AM)
Well Ron, we all remember how well the Republican Party vetted "The Mama Grizzly".

Musicmystery -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:33:12 AM)
Perhaps he's never heard of Bill Clinton, darling of the press.

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:33:45 AM)
Is it your contention that Palin wasnt vetted, or are you simply (quite simply) trying to twist my words quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 Well Ron we all remember how ell the Republican Party vetted Palin.

mnottertail -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:35:54 AM)
I believe we both have said that. Are you saying she was vetted? Certainly the media vetted her, that took all of 12 seconds, but that was way past your CPAC or your primary, and after you bought her some dresses that seem to get DYB all in a rut.

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:36:55 AM)
How the media reported that he was being persecuted by those mean ol Republicans for getting a blow job... Which in reality, he was an accused rapist who was also convicted of committing perjury while defending himself in a sexual harassment lawsuit Can you say "sexual predator" Yes, Ive heard of him quote: ORIGINAL: Musicmystery Perhaps he's never heard of Bill Clinton, darling of the press.

flcouple2009 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:37:49 AM)
The key part of that was "how well" the Republican party vetted her. If that's the best they can do then surely they should leave the vetting process to the media. Now back on topic oh lord of the hijack, Newt is the same liar and hypocrite he has always been. Nice of you to not touch that subject.

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:38:42 AM)
The moment she stepped into the spotlight the media erupted at her as quickly and as viciously as is humanly possible quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail I believe we both have said that. Are you saying she was vetted? Certainly the media vetted her, that took all of 12 seconds, but that was way past your CPAC or your primary, and after you bought her some dresses that seem to get DYB all in a rut.

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:40:20 AM)
Could I get a reading comprehension check on aisle nine, I never wrote anything about individual parties vetting candidates quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 The key part of that was "how well" the Republican party vetted her. If that's the best they can do then surely they should leave the vetting process to the media. Now back on topic oh lord of the hijack, Newt is the same liar and hypocrite he has always been. Nice of you to not touch that subject.

mnottertail -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:41:13 AM)
No more than it did any other person who was nothing but deceitful, and an ignorant cunt. Leona Helmsley was no darling of the press either.

flcouple2009 -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:44:11 AM)
Since you were the one posting the links with old Newt clamoring on about how he would have attacked immediately how are you feeling now that he has reversed course and says our participation is wrong?

Sanity -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:48:53 AM)
I dont recall posting the links you mention and Im not sure about Stevens source, it goes back to ThinkProgress which is equivelant to a story on Rush Limbaughs or Ann Coulters website... or worse. But if its true as reported then he would not be a good choice for president. quote: ORIGINAL: flcouple2009 Since you were the one posting the links with old Newt clamoring on about how he would have attacked immediately how are you feeling now that he has reversed course and says our participation is wrong?

Lucylastic -> RE: Gingrich's stance - criticizing Obama (3/25/2011 7:55:10 AM)
HIs facebookpage? http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=163128553742748 The thinkprogress page http://thinkprogress.org/2011/03/23/gingrich-libya-flip-flop/ with video and the today show link where he said he would not have intervened http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/42227087#42160716 oohhh and this http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/42227087#42227087

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125