Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/27/2011 7:25:19 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: isoLadyOwner


The Libyan Rebels are an armed force very likely to seek a Muslim Theocracy.

The Libyan Rebels will probably be the next imminent threat to US interests if they take power in Libya.

The US can't afford this war. Each cruise missile could have employed a few US citizens, the Federal Government could have taxed that money. Instead its wasted supporting a new Taliban.



I'm afraid I haven't seen any credible evidence to support the claims you have made that I have bolded above. I have heard Ghadaffi (rather incredibly IMHO) try to label the rebels as Al Quada.

Perhaps you could share with us the evidence that makes you so convinced the rebels are Islamists. In all the (radio) interviews I have heard with rebel spokespersons, they have asserted their goal is to get rid of Ghadaffi and have a democracy in Libya. They have rejected Islamist ideologies and denied any connection with Al Quada.

So I'd really love to see evidence to the contrary, if such evidence exists.

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 3/27/2011 7:28:48 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to isoLadyOwner)
Profile   Post #: 161
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/27/2011 7:27:14 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Since you somehow missed it the first five or six times I explained it, since you choose to miss all the clues Ive dropped, why am I to believe youre not going to continue to choose to remain ignorant if I explain it yet again.

Nice try at trying to build a strawman argument btw, nice attempt to make the thread about me as well.

Psych, not really.

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

So than tell us again what your issue is ? Invading(under false pretenses) Iraq = good due to the liberation of all of those muslims.
Participating in prosecuting a NFZ= bad...though it might result in the liberation of all those muslims.
Now the above is an oversimplification of your position.....but I am trying to work on your level.
Please explain the problem you have...other than it being President Obama at the helm.



_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 162
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/27/2011 7:48:35 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moonhead

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
Here is the main point, Lib Dems went apoplectic over the mention that we were helping the Iraqi people.

Probably because you weren't: your government only fell back on the "human rights" story after the "WMDs" and the "Albert Kwaida" stories were both demonstrated to be complete and utter bullshit, and the GOPseparatist neocon RINO wing was desperate to find another excuse for knocking over a government that was no threat to America* but owned a huge amount of oil reserves Haliburton fancied.

Now, how is the intervention in Libya any more reprehensible than that one? At least it isn't pissing off the UN, unlike the chimp's crusade...


Unfortunately for you and your compatriot ideologues, your claim that "human rights" was not a concurrent reason for the 2003 invasion of Iraq seems to be false.  In fact, it started during the Clinton administration:

Iraq Liberation Act

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq. It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States to support democratic movements within Iraq.

...

The Act contemplated the future need for War Crimes Tribunals in Iraq stating, "The Congress urges the President to call upon the United Nations to establish an international criminal tribunal for the purpose of indicting, prosecuting, and imprisoning Saddam Hussein and other Iraqi officials who are responsible for crimes against humanity, genocide, and other criminal violations of international law."

A generalized statement of policy toward the post-Hussein Iraq was also set forth stating, "It is the sense of the Congress that once the Saddam Hussein regime is removed from power in Iraq, the United States should support Iraq's transition to democracy by providing immediate and substantial humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, by providing democracy transition assistance to Iraqi parties and movements with democratic goals, and by convening Iraq's foreign creditors to develop a multilateral response to Iraq's foreign debt incurred by Saddam Hussein's regime."

...

President George W. Bush often referred to the Act and its findings to argue that the Clinton Administration supported regime change in Iraq and further that it believed that Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction. The Act was cited as a basis of support in the Congressional Authorization for use of Military Force Against Iraq in October 2002


Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002

The resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq:

...

*Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."

...

*Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.

Most damaging to your belief that human rights was not a factor in the decision to go to war, is the document that the White House released, which included all of the reasons that the US should go to war.  There is a section devoted specifically, in detail, to human rights abuses.

In order to establish the reasons for the report, here is a concurrent CNN article about it:

White House spells out case against Iraq
September 12, 2002

As the Bush administration makes its strongest bid yet for international and domestic support for action against Iraq this week, the White House released a report early Thursday, listing some of the principal accusations against Iraq and its leader.

The report was intended to serve as a "background paper" for Bush's U.N. speech.

"This document provides specific examples of how Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has systematically and continually violated 16 United Nations Security Council resolutions over the past decade, " the report said in a preface.

Titled "A Decade of Deception and Defiance," ...

...

The two remaining resolutions demand that Iraq release prisoners and return property to Kuwait after the Gulf War, and condemns Iraq's repression of civilians.

The actual document is available on-line, and I'll quote the entire section about human rights abuses:


Saddam Hussein's Repression of the Iraqi People

UNSCR 688 (April 5, 1991) "condemns" Saddam Hussein's repression of the Iraqi civilian population -- "the consequences of which threaten international peace and security." UNSCR 688 also requires Saddam Hussein to end his repression of the Iraqi people and to allow immediate access to international humanitarian organizations to help those in need of assistance. Saddam Hussein has repeatedly violated these provisions and has: expanded his violence against women and children; continued his horrific torture and execution of innocent Iraqis; continued to violate the basic human rights of the Iraqi people and has continued to control all sources of information (including killing more than 500 journalists and other opinion leaders in the past decade). Saddam Hussein has also harassed humanitarian aid workers; expanded his crimes against Muslims; he has withheld food from families that fail to offer their children to his regime; and he has continued to subject Iraqis to unfair imprisonment.

Refusal to Admit Human Rights Monitors

   * The UN Commission on Human Rights and the UN General Assembly issued a report that noted "with dismay" the lack of improvement in the situation of human rights in Iraq. The report strongly criticized the "systematic, widespread, and extremely grave violations of human rights" and of international humanitarian law by the Iraqi Government, which it stated resulted in "all-pervasive repression and oppression sustained by broad-based discrimination and widespread terror." The report called on the Iraqi Government to fulfill its obligations under international human rights treaties.

   * Saddam Hussein has repeatedly refused visits by human rights monitors and the establishment of independent human rights organizations. From 1992 until 2002, Saddam prevented the UN Special Rapporteur from visiting Iraq.

   * In September 2001 the Government expelled six UN humanitarian relief workers without providing any explanation.

Violence Against Women

   * Human rights organizations and opposition groups continued to receive reports of women who suffered from severe psychological trauma after being raped by Iraqi personnel while in custody.

   * Former Mukhabarat member Khalid Al-Janabi reported that a Mukhabarat unit, the Technical Operations Directorate, used rape and sexual assault in a systematic and institutionalized manner for political purposes. The unit reportedly also videotaped the rape of female relatives of suspected oppositionists and used the videotapes for blackmail purposes and to ensure their future cooperation.

   * In June 2000, a former Iraqi general reportedly received a videotape of security forces raping a female family member. He subsequently received a telephone call from an intelligence agent who stated that another female relative was being held and warned him to stop speaking out against the Iraqi Government.

   * Iraqi security forces allegedly raped women who were captured during the Anfal Campaign and during the occupation of Kuwait.

   * Amnesty International reported that, in October 2000, the Iraqi Government executed dozens of women accused of prostitution.

   * In May, the Iraqi Government reportedly tortured to death the mother of three Iraqi defectors for her children's opposition activities.

   * Iraqi security agents reportedly decapitated numerous women and men in front of their family members. According to Amnesty International, the victims' heads were displayed in front of their homes for several days.

Torture

    * Iraqi security services routinely and systematically torture detainees. According to former prisoners, torture techniques included branding, electric shocks administered to the genitals and other areas, beating, pulling out of fingernails, burning with hot irons and blowtorches, suspension from rotating ceiling fans, dripping acid on the skin, rape, breaking of limbs, denial of food and water, extended solitary confinement in dark and extremely small compartments, and threats to rape or otherwise harm family members and relatives. Evidence of such torture often was apparent when security forces returned the mutilated bodies of torture victims to their families.

   * According to a report received by the UN Special Rapporteur in 1998, hundreds of Kurds and other detainees have been held without charge for close to two decades in extremely harsh conditions, and many of them have been used as subjects in Iraq's illegal experimental chemical and biological weapons programs.

   * In 2000, the authorities reportedly introduced tongue amputation as a punishment for persons who criticize Saddam Hussein or his family, and on July 17, government authorities reportedly amputated the tongue of a person who allegedly criticized Saddam Hussein. Authorities reportedly performed the amputation in front of a large crowd. Similar tongue amputations also reportedly occurred.

   * Refugees fleeing to Europe often reported instances of torture to receiving governments, and displayed scars and mutilations to substantiate their claims.

   * In August 2001 Amnesty International released a report entitled Iraq -- Systematic Torture of Political Prisoners, which detailed the systematic and routine use of torture against suspected political opponents and, occasionally, other prisoners. Amnesty International also reports "Detainees have also been threatened with bringing in a female relative, especially the wife or the mother, and raping her in front of the detainee. Some of these threats have been carried out."

   * Saad Keis Naoman, an Iraqi soccer player who defected to Europe, reported that he and his teammates were beaten and humiliated at the order of Uday Saddam Hussein for poor performances. He was flogged until his back was bloody, forcing him to sleep on his stomach in the tiny cell in Al-Radwaniya prison.

Executions and Repression of Political Opposition

   * Former UN Human Rights Special Rapporteur Max Van der Stoel's report in April 1998 stated that Iraq had executed at least 1,500 people during the previous year for political reasons.

   * The government continues to execute summarily alleged political opponents and leaders in the Shi'a religious community. Reports suggest that persons were executed merely because of their association with an opposition group or as part of a continuing effort to reduce prison populations.

   * In February 2001, the Government reportedly executed 37 political detainees for opposition activity.

   * In June 2001, security forces killed a Shi'a cleric, Hussein Bahar al-Uloom, for refusing to appear on television to congratulate Qusay Saddam Hussein for his election to a Ba'th Party position. Such killings continue an apparent government policy of eliminating prominent Shi'a clerics who are suspected of disloyalty to the government. In 1998 and 1999, the Government killed a number of leading Shi'a clerics, prompting the former Special Rapporteur in 1999 to express his concern to the government that the killings might be part of a systematic attack by government officials on the independent leadership of the Shi'a Muslim community. The government did not respond to the Special Rapporteur's letter.

   * There are persistent reports that families are made to pay for the cost of executions.

   * Saddam Hussein destroyed the southern Iraqi town of Albu 'Aysh sometime between September 1998 and December 1999.

   * Iraq has conducted a systematic "Arabization" campaign of ethnic cleansing designed to harass and expel ethnic Kurds and Turkmen from government-controlled areas. Non-Arab citizens are forced to change their ethnicity or their identity documents and adopt Arab names, or they are deprived of their homes, property and food-ration cards, and expelled.

Saddam Hussein's Abuse of Children

   * Saddam Hussein has held 3-week training courses in weapons use, hand-to-hand fighting, rappelling from helicopters, and infantry tactics for children between 10 and 15 years of age. Camps for these "Saddam Cubs" operated throughout the country. Senior military officers who supervised the courses noted that the children held up under the "physical and psychological strain" of training that lasted for as long as 14 hours each day. Sources in the opposition report that the army found it difficult to recruit enough children to fill all of the vacancies in the program. Families reportedly were threatened with the loss of their food ration cards if they refused to enroll their children in the course. The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq reported in October 1999 that authorities were denying food ration cards to families that failed to send their young sons to Saddam Cubs compulsory weapons-training camps. Similarly, authorities reportedly withheld school examination results to students unless they registered in the Fedayeen Saddam organization.

   * Iraq often announces food ration cuts for the general population, blaming US or UK actions. Among the most controversial have been cuts in baby milk rations. Iraq has blamed the shortages on US and UK contract rejections, although the UN has approved all baby milk contracts submitted.

   * Child labor persists and there are instances of forced labor.

   * There are widespread reports that food and medicine that could have been made available to the general public, including children, have been stockpiled in warehouses or diverted for the personal use of some government officials.

Disappearances

   * Amnesty International reported that Iraq has the world's worst record for numbers of persons who have disappeared or remain unaccounted for.

   * In 1999, the UN Special Rapporteur stated that Iraq remains the country with the highest number of disappearances known to the UN: over 16,000.

Basic Freedoms: Freedom of Speech, Freedom of the Press, Freedom of Information

   * In practice, Saddam Hussein does not permit freedom of speech or of the press, and does not tolerate political dissent in areas under its control. In November 2000, the UN General Assembly criticized Saddam Hussein's "suppression of freedom of thought, expression, information, association, and assembly." The Special Rapporteur stated in October 1999 that citizens lived "in a climate of fear," in which whatever they said or did, particularly in the area of politics, involved "the risk of arrest and interrogation by the police or military intelligence." He noted that "the mere suggestion that someone is not a supporter of the President carries the prospect of the death penalty."

   * In June 2001, the Human Rights Alliance reported that Saddam Hussein had killed more than 500 journalists and other intellectuals in the past decade.

   * Saddam Hussein frequently infringes on citizens' constitutional right to privacy. Saddam routinely ignores constitutional provisions designed to protect the confidentiality of mail, telegraphic correspondence, and telephone conversations. Iraq periodically jams news broadcasts from outside the country, including those of opposition groups. The security services and the Ba'th Party maintain pervasive networks of informers to deter dissident activity and instill fear in the public.

   * Foreign journalists must work from offices located within the Iraqi ministry building and are accompanied everywhere they go by ministry officers, who reportedly restrict their movements and make it impossible for them to interact freely with citizens.

   * The Iraqi Government, the Ba'th Party, or persons close to Saddam Hussein own all print and broadcast media, and operate them as propaganda outlets. They generally do not report opposing points of view that are expressed either domestically or abroad.

   * In September 1999, Hashem Hasan, a journalist and Baghdad University professor, was arrested after declining an appointment as editor of one of Uday Hussein's publications. The Paris-based Reporters Sans Frontieres (RSF) sent a letter of appeal to Uday Hussein; however, Hassan's fate and whereabouts remained unknown at year's end.

   * Saddam Hussein regularly jams foreign news broadcasts. Satellite dishes, modems, and fax machines are banned, although some restrictions reportedly were lifted in 1999.

   * In government-operated Internet cafes, users only are permitted to view web sites provided by the Ministry of Culture and Information.

   * In 1999, Uday Hussein reportedly dismissed hundreds of members of the Iraqi Union of Journalists for not praising Saddam Hussein and the Government sufficiently.

Withholding of Food

   * Relatives who do not report deserters may lose their ration cards for purchasing government-controlled food supplies, be evicted from their residences, or face the arrest of other family members. The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq reported in October and December 1999 that authorities denied food ration cards to families that failed to send their young sons to the "Saddam's Cubs" compulsory weapons training camps.

Crimes Against Muslims

   * The Government consistently politicizes and interferes with religious pilgrimages, both of Iraqi Muslims who wish to make the Hajj to Mecca and Medina and of Iraqi and non-Iraqi Muslim pilgrims who travel to holy sites within the country. For example, in 1998 the UN Sanctions Committee offered to disburse vouchers for travel and expenses to pilgrims making the Hajj; however, the Government rejected this offer. In 1999 the Sanctions Committee offered to disburse funds to cover Hajj-related expenses via a neutral third party; the Government again rejected the offer. Following the December 1999 passage of UN Security Council Resolution 1284, the Sanctions Committee again sought to devise a protocol to facilitate the payment for individuals making the journey. The Sanctions Committee proposed to issue $250 in cash and $1,750 in travelers checks to each individual pilgrim to be distributed at the U.N. office in Baghdad in the presence of both U.N. and Iraqi officials. The Government again declined and, consequently, no Iraqi pilgrims were able to take advantage of the available funds or, in 2000, of the permitted flights. The Government continued to insist that these funds would be accepted only if they were paid in cash to the government-controlled central bank, not to the Hajj pilgrims.

More than 95 percent of the population of Iraq are Muslim. The (predominantly Arab) Shi'a Muslims constitute a 60 to 65 percent majority:

   * The Iraqi government has for decades conducted a brutal campaign of murder, summary execution, and protracted arbitrary arrest against the religious leaders and followers of the majority Shi'a Muslim population. Despite nominal legal protection of religious equality, the Government has repressed severely the Shi'a clergy and those who follow the Shi'a faith.

   * Forces from the Mukhabarat, General Security (Amn Al-Amm), the Military Bureau, Saddam's Commandos (Fedayeen Saddam), and the Ba'th Party have killed senior Shi'a clerics, desecrated Shi'a mosques and holy sites, and interfered with Shi'a religious education. Security agents reportedly are stationed at all the major Shi'a mosques and shrines, where they search, harass, and arbitrarily arrest worshipers.

   * The following government restrictions on religious rights remained in effect during 2001: restrictions and outright bans on communal Friday prayer by Shi'a Muslims; restrictions on the loaning of books by Shi'a mosque libraries; a ban on the broadcast of Shi'a programs on government-controlled radio or television; a ban on the publication of Shi'a books, including prayer books and guides; a ban on funeral processions other than those organized by the Government; a ban on other Shi'a funeral observances such as gatherings for Koran reading; and the prohibition of certain processions and public meetings that commemorate Shi'a holy days. Shi'a groups report that they captured documents from the security services during the 1991 uprising that listed thousands of forbidden Shi'a religious writings.

   * In June 1999, several Shi'a opposition groups reported that the Government instituted a program in the predominantly Shi'a districts of Baghdad that used food ration cards to restrict where individuals could pray. The ration cards, part of the UN oil-for-food program, reportedly are checked when the bearer enters a mosque and are printed with a notice of severe penalties for those who attempt to pray at an unauthorized location.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Moonhead)
Profile   Post #: 163
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 3:46:52 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Thank you Firm, I missed seeing that post of Moons.

How soon some forget.




_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 164
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 3:59:55 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


My how time changes some things. Heres a post from 2008:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

We've already done what we set out to do. Remove Sadam and help them establish a government and army. They have both. Our work is done.



You could argue they had a government and an army beforehand. All that has happened is the power has been passed from Sunni to Shia.



Now, who do you suppose the new master in Libya will be? Ive yet to hear anyone say who will take responsibility for the outcome there.



Apples and Oranges trying to link Libya with Iraq. Lets not forget you were all chasing wmd`s that Bush and Blair new didnt exist. To say now it was to protect civillians is revisionist nonsense. As for who the new master in Libya will be, I havent a clue.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 165
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 4:24:45 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

I am guessing you somehow missed seeing Firms post above
 


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 166
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 6:58:06 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I am guessing that all you missed Ws speech because of the loud sounds throwing him under the bus and recribbling over the pages of history, you think he would have made that justification, BUT NO.....

<full text>
My fellow citizens, events in Iraq have now reached the final days of decision. For more than a decade, the United States and other nations have pursued patient and honorable efforts to disarm the Iraqi regime without war. That regime pledged to reveal and destroy all its weapons of mass destruction as a condition for ending the Persian Gulf War in 1991.
Since then, the world has engaged in 12 years of diplomacy. We have passed more than a dozen resolutions in the United Nations Security Council. We have sent hundreds of weapons inspectors to oversee the disarmament of Iraq. Our good faith has not been returned.
The Iraqi regime has used diplomacy as a ploy to gain time and advantage. It has uniformly defied Security Council resolutions demanding full disarmament. Over the years, U.N. weapon inspectors have been threatened by Iraqi officials, electronically bugged, and systematically deceived. Peaceful efforts to disarm the Iraqi regime have failed again and again -- because we are not dealing with peaceful men.
Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised. This regime has already used weapons of mass destruction against Iraq's neighbors and against Iraq's people.
The regime has a history of reckless aggression in the Middle East. It has a deep hatred of America and our friends. And it has aided, trained and harbored terrorists, including operatives of al Qaeda.
The danger is clear: using chemical, biological or, one day, nuclear weapons, obtained with the help of Iraq, the terrorists could fulfill their stated ambitions and kill thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country, or any other.
The United States and other nations did nothing to deserve or invite this threat. But we will do everything to defeat it. Instead of drifting along toward tragedy, we will set a course toward safety. Before the day of horror can come, before it is too late to act, this danger will be removed.
The United States of America has the sovereign authority to use force in assuring its own national security. That duty falls to me, as Commander-in-Chief, by the oath I have sworn, by the oath I will keep.
Recognizing the threat to our country, the United States Congress voted overwhelmingly last year to support the use of force against Iraq. America tried to work with the United Nations to address this threat because we wanted to resolve the issue peacefully. We believe in the mission of the United Nations. One reason the UN was founded after the second world war was to confront aggressive dictators, actively and early, before they can attack the innocent and destroy the peace.
In the case of Iraq, the Security Council did act, in the early 1990s. Under Resolutions 678 and 687 - both still in effect - the United States and our allies are authorized to use force in ridding Iraq of weapons of mass destruction. This is not a question of authority, it is a question of will.
Last September, I went to the U.N. General Assembly and urged the nations of the world to unite and bring an end to this danger. On November 8, the Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1441, finding Iraq in material breach of its obligations, and vowing serious consequences if Iraq did not fully and immediately disarm.
Today, no nation can possibly claim that Iraq has disarmed. And it will not disarm so long as Saddam Hussein holds power. For the last four-and-a-half months, the United States and our allies have worked within the Security Council to enforce that Council's long-standing demands. Yet, some permanent members of the Security Council have publicly announced they will veto any resolution that compels the disarmament of Iraq. These governments share our assessment of the danger, but not our resolve to meet it. Many nations, however, do have the resolve and fortitude to act against this threat to peace, and a broad coalition is now gathering to enforce the just demands of the world. The United Nations Security Council has not lived up to its responsibilities, so we will rise to ours.
In recent days, some governments in the Middle East have been doing their part. They have delivered public and private messages urging the dictator to leave Iraq, so that disarmament can proceed peacefully. He has thus far refused. All the decades of deceit and cruelty have now reached an end. Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours. Their refusal to do so will result in military conflict, commenced at a time of our choosing. For their own safety, all foreign nationals - including journalists and inspectors - should leave Iraq immediately.
Many Iraqis can hear me tonight in a translated radio broadcast, and I have a message for them. If we must begin a military campaign, it will be directed against the lawless men who rule your country and not against you. As our coalition takes away their power, we will deliver the food and medicine you need. We will tear down the apparatus of terror and we will help you to build a new Iraq that is prosperous and free. In a free Iraq, there will be no more wars of aggression against your neighbors, no more poison factories, no more executions of dissidents, no more torture chambers and rape rooms. The tyrant will soon be gone. The day of your liberation is near.
It is too late for Saddam Hussein to remain in power. It is not too late for the Iraqi military to act with honor and protect your country by permitting the peaceful entry of coalition forces to eliminate weapons of mass destruction. Our forces will give Iraqi military units clear instructions on actions they can take to avoid being attacked and destroyed. I urge every member of the Iraqi military and intelligence services, if war comes, do not fight for a dying regime that is not worth your own life.
And all Iraqi military and civilian personnel should listen carefully to this warning. In any conflict, your fate will depend on your action. Do not destroy oil wells, a source of wealth that belongs to the Iraqi people. Do not obey any command to use weapons of mass destruction against anyone, including the Iraqi people. War crimes will be prosecuted. War criminals will be punished. And it will be no defense to say, "I was just following orders."
Should Saddam Hussein choose confrontation, the American people can know that every measure has been taken to avoid war, and every measure will be taken to win it. Americans understand the costs of conflict because we have paid them in the past. War has no certainty, except the certainty of sacrifice.
Yet, the only way to reduce the harm and duration of war is to apply the full force and might of our military, and we are prepared to do so. If Saddam Hussein attempts to cling to power, he will remain a deadly foe until the end. In desperation, he and terrorists groups might try to conduct terrorist operations against the American people and our friends. These attacks are not inevitable. They are, however, possible. And this very fact underscores the reason we cannot live under the threat of blackmail. The terrorist threat to America and the world will be diminished the moment that Saddam Hussein is disarmed.
Our government is on heightened watch against these dangers. Just as we are preparing to ensure victory in Iraq, we are taking further actions to protect our homeland. In recent days, American authorities have expelled from the country certain individuals with ties to Iraqi intelligence services. Among other measures, I have directed additional security of our airports, and increased Coast Guard patrols of major seaports. The Department of Homeland Security is working closely with the nation's governors to increase armed security at critical facilities across America.
Should enemies strike our country, they would be attempting to shift our attention with panic and weaken our morale with fear. In this, they would fail. No act of theirs can alter the course or shake the resolve of this country. We are a peaceful people - yet we're not a fragile people, and we will not be intimidated by thugs and killers. If our enemies dare to strike us, they and all who have aided them, will face fearful consequences.
We are now acting because the risks of inaction would be far greater. In one year, or five years, the power of Iraq to inflict harm on all free nations would be multiplied many times over. With these capabilities, Saddam Hussein and his terrorist allies could choose the moment of deadly conflict when they are strongest. We choose to meet that threat now, where it arises, before it can appear suddenly in our skies and cities.
The cause of peace requires all free nations to recognize new and undeniable realities. In the 20th century, some chose to appease murderous dictators, whose threats were allowed to grow into genocide and global war. In this century, when evil men plot chemical, biological and nuclear terror, a policy of appeasement could bring destruction of a kind never before seen on this earth.
Terrorists and terror states do not reveal these threats with fair notice, in formal declarations - and responding to such enemies only after they have struck first is not self-defense, it is suicide. The security of the world requires disarming Saddam Hussein now.
As we enforce the just demands of the world, we will also honor the deepest commitments of our country. Unlike Saddam Hussein, we believe the Iraqi people are deserving and capable of human liberty. And when the dictator has departed, they can set an example to all the Middle East of a vital and peaceful and self-governing nation.
The United States, with other countries, will work to advance liberty and peace in that region. Our goal will not be achieved overnight, but it can come over time. The power and appeal of human liberty is felt in every life and every land. And the greatest power of freedom is to overcome hatred and violence, and turn the creative gifts of men and women to the pursuits of peace.
That is the future we choose. Free nations have a duty to defend our people by uniting against the violent. And tonight, as we have done before, America and our allies accept that responsibility.
Good night, and may God continue to bless America. </full text>



Some of you guys should actually involve yourself in facts, rather than the aftermarket of spin in justifiying a pure ideological war of agression.   

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 167
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 7:03:20 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Hint - its the agenda, stupid.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


Video - RAF Tornado jet destroys Libyan tanks

Since when did tanks fly, or shoot down aircraft?




Perhaps the question is in the domain of the RAF.  The difficulty with you is your simplistic kneejerk responses and thought processes.


Hint:  We ain't the fuckin RAF; its either gonna be Canada, UK, or Trinidad and Tobago, you seem to have difficulty with perspective and proportion, so I will give you a bigger hint, it is where you take Coals to Newcastle.   

This doesn't even deserve to be called a specious argument.



HINT:  Why are we doing this, all the rebels are dead.  I know, I heard it from a guy who gets everything wrong.  He heard it echoing thru rushes bowels whilst felching.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 168
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 7:06:39 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

Hint - you are posting out of ignorance.

US led air strikes


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 169
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 7:08:38 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

And no, I never wrote that the rebels were all dead, not only do you choose to remain ignorant but you also lie.

_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 170
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 7:13:23 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
LOL, ok, I've kicked the shit out of you enough for one day, and will leave someone else to get your words, in demonstration of that prevarication.  Sanity, you might be able to get away with some of the ignorant shit you posted at the inception of Iraq, most people are too lazy to find it, but they will 'refudiate' shit less than a week old you say.








Nah, you know what?

RE: Gadhafi tells rebels to surrender - 3/18/2011 8:23:18 AM   

post 107 thru 109, and maybe I can't recall 201 times is Cheney let go on FAUX NUZE, but that ain't so here, sport.

< Message edited by mnottertail -- 3/28/2011 7:19:30 AM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 171
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 7:19:16 AM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

LOLOLOLOL

Old man, you couldnt kick the shit out of a can these days

I posted some fun antiwar shit that "polite" sub wrote back in 2008 that would embarrass anyone who wasnt so in the tank for Obama and Islamic radicals as he is, Im sure I can dig up some of your old posts too  (except your gibberish is can  hardly be understood most days, maybe I will give it a try anyway some time).

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, ok, I've kicked the shit out of you enough for one day, and will leave someone else to get your words, in demonstration of that prevarication.  Sanity, you might be able to get away with some of the ignorant shit you posted at the inception of Iraq, most people are too lazy to find it, but they will 'refudiate' shit less than a week old you say.




_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 172
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 7:20:48 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Imbiciles cannot successfully distinguish logic from magic, or thought from gibberish.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 173
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 7:31:33 AM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline
Unfortunately, on this one, history is against us. EVERY time we have messed around in the middle east in the past 65 years, it has eventually bitten us on the ass. How long do you think it will take this time?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 174
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 7:35:16 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I do not know, I do not like us being there, or Iraq or Afghanistan, but am glad we are not in there with both feet.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 175
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 11:04:43 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I am guessing that all you missed Ws speech because of the loud sounds throwing him under the bus and recribbling over the pages of history, you think he would have made that justification, BUT NO.....

Some of you guys should actually involve yourself in facts, rather than the aftermarket of spin in justifiying a pure ideological war of agression.   

Posting a "bunch o' stuff" doesn't prove anything, Ron.

Below is a redacted and highlighted version of the version speech you quote in its entirety above.  Notice the comments about human rights, and the right of a people to an open and democratic government.

quote:

<full text>

...
This regime has already used weapons of mass destruction against Iraq's neighbors and against Iraq's people.

The regime has a history of reckless aggression in the Middle East. It has a deep hatred of America and our friends. And it has aided, trained and harbored terrorists, including operatives of al Qaeda.
...

Many Iraqis can hear me tonight in a translated radio broadcast, and I have a message for them. If we must begin a military campaign, it will be directed against the lawless men who rule your country and not against you. As our coalition takes away their power, we will deliver the food and medicine you need. We will tear down the apparatus of terror and we will help you to build a new Iraq that is prosperous and free. In a free Iraq, there will be no more wars of aggression against your neighbors, no more poison factories, no more executions of dissidents, no more torture chambers and rape rooms. The tyrant will soon be gone. The day of your liberation is near.

...

And all Iraqi military and civilian personnel should listen carefully to this warning. In any conflict, your fate will depend on your action. Do not destroy oil wells, a source of wealth that belongs to the Iraqi people. Do not obey any command to use weapons of mass destruction against anyone, including the Iraqi people. War crimes will be prosecuted. War criminals will be punished. And it will be no defense to say, "I was just following orders."

...

The cause of peace requires all free nations to recognize new and undeniable realities. In the 20th century, some chose to appease murderous dictators, whose threats were allowed to grow into genocide and global war. In this century, when evil men plot chemical, biological and nuclear terror, a policy of appeasement could bring destruction of a kind never before seen on this earth.
...

Terrorists and terror states do not reveal these threats with fair notice, in formal declarations - and responding to such enemies only after they have struck first is not self-defense, it is suicide. The security of the world requires disarming Saddam Hussein now.
As we enforce the just demands of the world, we will also honor the deepest commitments of our country. Unlike Saddam Hussein, we believe the Iraqi people are deserving and capable of human liberty. And when the dictator has departed, they can set an example to all the Middle East of a vital and peaceful and self-governing nation.


The United States, with other countries, will work to advance liberty and peace in that region. Our goal will not be achieved overnight, but it can come over time. The power and appeal of human liberty is felt in every life and every land. And the greatest power of freedom is to overcome hatred and violence, and turn the creative gifts of men and women to the pursuits of peace.
</full text>


How you could even quote this as some sort of counter-point to my post is beyond me, unless you simply didn't read it, or having read it, did not understand it.

Firm

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 3/28/2011 11:05:24 AM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 176
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 11:21:48 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
 
that is just to disingenuous, it is as if you have never considered political thought or its usage at all.

I coulda bolded alotta shit too, and had you been following Iraq in a logical reasoned manner as it unfolded (remember our little spat about recruiting levels and drafts?)

Anyway, the idea was that the neocons were full of we are going to go in there and fucking clean up on this guy and the entire country will be lifted in spirit, and so enheartend that they will enjoin the american troops and go bugshit and do what they had no fucking desire to do or did do.

So, since Obama said hope and change, you see hope and change, and thats all you talkin bout, right willis?

So, based on that, why are they bombing us, Firm?  One of us is wrong about this stuff, and I don't think it is the one wondering why we are being blown up by the very people we saved .... 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 177
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 12:28:54 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity
I posted some fun antiwar shit that "polite" sub wrote back in 2008 that would embarrass anyone who wasnt so in the tank for Obama and Islamic radicals as he is,



If you think what I posted was antiwar stuff you should try reading the whole thread, then get someone to explain "Context" to you. How the hell is a thread entitled "Define victory in Iraq" or come to that my words, any sort of anti-war stance ?

As for me being in the tank to radicals. Whats that about ? I have made clear my distaste for terrorism, in any form, over and over again. 

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 178
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 12:33:45 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity


I am guessing you somehow missed seeing Firms post above
 



No I just treated Bush`s statement with the contempt it deserves. Much of what he claimed was either out of date, or a blatant lie, such as the "Regime change act" giving him some sort of green light.

As I have said before, both Bush and Blair concentrated on one thing to sway any argument. WMDs which we know know for sure, and they knew all along, was based on faulty intel. 

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 179
RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. - 3/28/2011 1:00:01 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
PoliteSub, get in touch with ConservativeMike, they just put out a call for "Human Sheilds!"

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 180
Page:   <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Pentagon may add more air power in Libya. Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156