RE: bi play

RE: bi play (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress

Message

PeonForHer -> RE: bi play (6/1/2011 5:07:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: OttersSwim EDIT: Is that a form of bi play? It could be. Why not? Phwoar! [;)]

LanceHughes -> RE: bi play (6/2/2011 2:31:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: OttersSwim EDIT: Is that a form of bi play? It could be. Why not? Phwoar! [;)] Now let me see if I understand this correctly. I have Peon and Otter in a dungeon and each of them is trying to get my [further] attention by saying things like, "Sir, he[or she] deserves the next six strokes, Sir. Not me, Sir. Please, Sir. HIM [or HER]! Yeow!" 'Scuse me, please. A personal matter just came up. I'll handle it and be back when done. [Of course, the entrende' is double. Just whom did you think was posting?] edited to 'try' different whom/who combos..... never did learn that properly :::sigh:::

PeonForHer -> RE: bi play (6/2/2011 6:00:32 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LanceHughes I have Peon and Otter in a dungeon and each of them is trying to get my [further] attention by saying things like, "Sir, he[or she] deserves the next six strokes, Sir. Not me, Sir. Please, Sir. HIM [or HER]! Yeow!" 'Scuse me, please. A personal matter just came up. I'll handle it and be back when done. [Of course, the entrende' is double. Just whom did you think was posting?] edited to 'try' different whom/who combos..... never did learn that properly :::sigh::: Otters would chicken out, Lance. He's a big milksop. [;)] For what it's worth: I was never all that confident about who/whom combos either. Tricky blighters, those whos and whoms.

OttersSwim -> RE: bi play (6/2/2011 6:41:58 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote: ORIGINAL: LanceHughes I have Peon and Otter in a dungeon and each of them is trying to get my [further] attention by saying things like, "Sir, he[or she] deserves the next six strokes, Sir. Not me, Sir. Please, Sir. HIM [or HER]! Yeow!" 'Scuse me, please. A personal matter just came up. I'll handle it and be back when done. [Of course, the entrende' is double. Just whom did you think was posting?] edited to 'try' different whom/who combos..... never did learn that properly :::sigh::: Otters would chicken out, Lance. He's a big milksop. [;)] For what it's worth: I was never all that confident about who/whom combos either. Tricky blighters, those whos and whoms. It's true...I faint dead away at the sight of Barry Manilow in his bicycle cape. Ooh crikey, ooh carrots, ooh crumbs! It's...It's...! [sm=runaway.gif] THUD

ElanSubdued -> RE: bi play (6/4/2011 1:13:54 PM)
Lady Pact, quote: LadyPact to msub4u2: While you're certainly welcome and I appreciate you agreeing with My original statement, this follow up borders on being a bit silly. I'd hate to think that your former Mistress was either so short-sighted or perhaps a bit homophobic to even be making such statements that sexual acts between those of the same gender weren't "normal" or that "real men" don't do this or that. I mean, if someone was going for the humiliation angle in particular, that's one thing, but as a general statement, it's pretty screwed up. And this, Lady Pact, is one of the many reasons why we all luvvvvs You. Really. Truly. E.

ElanSubdued -> RE: bi play (6/4/2011 1:24:01 PM)
OttersSwim, quote: OttersSwim to PeonForHer: Ah, a rousing game of Chuck the Other Sub Under the Bus does the soul good! [;)] EDIT: Is that a form of bi play? It is indeed bi play, especially if the rest of us male s-types get to join in afterward with some foot trampling. Don't worry. We won't mess up your mascara... just the rest of you... though actually I think you'd pull off the "tawdry and trampled slut with running mascara" look rather well. :-) Edited to add... quote of the day most certainly goes to you, Otters! "It's true... I faint dead away at the sight of Barry Manilow in his bicycle cape." E.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875