Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: I hope that dumbass preacher in fl is proud of himself


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: I hope that dumbass preacher in fl is proud of himself Page: <<   < prev  11 12 13 14 [15]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: I hope that dumbass preacher in fl is proud of himself - 4/7/2011 4:18:25 PM   
Edwynn


Posts: 4105
Joined: 10/26/2008
Status: offline



This has already been pointed out in these posts for those who were paying attention, but the repeated failure of many to understand exactly what transpired and Jones culpability in incurring damage far more serious than pissing off a few Muslims, as witnessed by the mindless repetition of the 'free speech' thing, requires that facts be reiterated on a regular basis.

http://articles.nydailynews.com/2010-09-09/news/27074887_1_islamic-extremists-koran-security-risk

"A Florida pastor's plan of holding a rally to burn Korans on the anniversary of 9/11 has ignited fears that Americans' security may be at risk. The international police agency Interpol warned governments worldwide Thursday of an increased chance of terror attacks if the planned event takes place. "If the proposed Koran burning by a pastor in the U.S. goes ahead as planned, there is a strong likelihood that violent attacks on innocent people would follow," the agency said. Interpol added it was acting partly on a request from Pakistan. In the U.S., the FBI issued its own caution that the rally could lead to attacks on the pastor, his congregation and U.S. interests abroad. The State Department warned American embassies to be on high alert this weekend. "Depending on the continued national and international publicity the event receives, it may also inspire retaliatory attacks against U.S. facilities overseas," the FBI said in a statement. Geoffrey Morrell, the Pentagon spokesman, said the Obama Administration is contemplating whether U.S. leaders would call Jones and personally ask him to call the event off."

As it turns out, at least one US leader did in fact call Jones and laid out to him exactly the great danger to US personnel and significant damage to US interests that would unquestionably result were he to proceed with the action.

http://www.newsytype.com/2057-danger-in-koran-burning/

"General David Petraeus has cautioned the church that should the demonstration of burning the Koran take place, it will put servicemen and women in greater danger than ever before."

"The commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus, according to the Christian Science Monitor, has asked the church to not partake in any Koran burning. He said that a group of American Christians burning the Koran will accomplish nothing positive. He insists it will only be doing the Taliban and Al Qaeda a favor, as it will be a recruiting tool that highlights perceived American bigotry. He cautioned that American soldiers and civilians abroad will be put in greater danger. He also lamented that winning over hearts and minds in Afghanistan will be next to impossible if these sorts of threats continue."

So then Jones and his 'church' had all this information, and at least paused to give token tempory consideration to the lives of US personnel and US interests.

"The Dove World Outreach Center Church is weighing the decision to go through with the burnings. Pastor Terry Jones said that the members of the church were concerned about the potential impact and are thinking over the planned demonstration, according to CNN. Some pause was given to the members by the warning from Gen. David Petraeus, ... "

They held off on the Sept. date but, having been no less aware of the repercussions and considerations far beyond their little piss ant rock throwing tantrum decided to proceed anyway in March.

Did Patreus ask Jones to stand down on his constitutional right to free speech? He never mentioned it. He informed Jones of the sure and predictable damage that it would cause and asked that he reconsider the proposed action.

Jones considered. Jones said "F#CK YOU!" to soldiers and workers abroad and the national interests of the US, and he never even brought 'free speech' into it. It should not take much powers of observation to understand that Jones never mentioned 'free speech' (at least beforehand) because if he feels that his little nut case religious 'cause' is above and more important than national interests, then it is hardly likely that he would consider something so inconsequential to his concerns as the Constitution or anything therein to be worthy of consideration. His own interpretation of his god was the only thing that mattered, and contained all the 'law' and 'rights' he needed, screw all that secular stuff. 



Premeditated, unmitigated, and completely reckless action against his own citizens and his own country, nothing less.


But the constitution said he could.


Well I'm so glad that's been pointed out, what, several hundred times here?


What is actually pointed out is some people's incapacity to comprehend there ever being any consideration that could stand above the right to poop in the public well, being that it remotely, possibly, conceivably, be a 'free speech' issue.


Congratulations on your deep and well thought out understanding of priorities.


So then, we cannot abrogate the of right anyone in our 'society' (and what a complete joke to use the word 'society' at all in this mindset) to shoot himself in the foot  with an RPG just because the shooter is in a reclining position and the grenade will likely continue its path and kill several others.

We are not to take any measures in trying to prevent harm to numerous others if there's any possibility whatsoever that it could even conceivably interfere with his holy sacred right to shoot self in foot.



Got it.







< Message edited by Edwynn -- 4/7/2011 4:45:38 PM >

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 281
RE: I hope that dumbass preacher in fl is proud of himself - 4/7/2011 5:19:13 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster

Tweaky - excellent point about the interchangeability of Jones and the rioters.

I find myself in the uncomfortable position of being thoroughly disgusted by Jones' action, whilst simultaneously defending his right to perform such action. Jones is morally repugnant to me. But what is also repugnant to me is the attempt by some to assert that the murders were no worse than the burning of a book, and that Jones is responsible for those murders. I have yet to see any argument based on anything other than Appeals to Emotion.

Moving along, here's the thread about cognitive dissonance. I could have written the OP better.
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3372364/mpage_1/tm.htm

I think a strong case can be made for conservatives, regardless of their culture, being more prone to Cog.D., and also a case can be made connecting conservatism to well-developed Terror Management coping strategies. A belief in an afterlife is, IMO, the definitive coping technique. That would also be an interesting thesis. Which means it would go over like a Led Zeppelin. (I mean, look how many threads here are the intellectual equivalent of "Look at Kim Kardashian's Dress!")

I think I'll start a thread rating system for P&R.

I don't believe Jones should have exercised his right to do what he did because the probable harmful consequences (the deaths of innocent people) far outweighed any positive consequences. So, in my view, while it was legally permissible, it was morally indefensible.

Cognitive dissonance - the ability to reconcile contradictory data - is not the exclusive preserve of any one group. Any one with a world view indulges in CD to one extent or another - it's unavoidable. We all do it and we all have to do it because none of us is capable of constructing a perfect world view.

The thread was interesting - thanks HK for the link. I do like the way it exposes the insecurities that lie at the heart of conservatism. Pyschology tells us the how but to find out the why one needs to look at radical psychoanalysis. That provides the most persuasive explanations I've encountered of why ppl cling to ideologies that aren't in their interests - it answers the question: why do ppl desire their own oppression.

There is a school of thought that asserts all human ideologies are attempts to impose an order on a potentially chaotic Nature - they're all coping methods in other words. Jones, the mullahs and rioters can all be seen as trying to cope with challenges to their world views through attacking the symbols of those challenges, the Koran, the UN, in the naive belief that destruction of the symbol will force the challenge to disappear.

This tragedy and the pointlessness of such efforts underlines the stupidity of resisting change because of fears of the consequences of change. The same stupidity promotes inertia for inertia's sake and privileges uniformity for fear of diversity. But some ppl find that emotionally satisfying ........ they need it

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 4/7/2011 5:39:35 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to Hippiekinkster)
Profile   Post #: 282
Page:   <<   < prev  11 12 13 14 [15]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: I hope that dumbass preacher in fl is proud of himself Page: <<   < prev  11 12 13 14 [15]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.063