Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/18/2011 4:57:13 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Is there no way to limit this board to actual profiles....his continued presence insults every last one of us.


_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to desiertoperro)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/18/2011 5:11:20 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Ill put my history up against either of them Mike.
ANYDAY
I gave my opinion on krugman, My opinion of Ryan is so low and utter disgust that I would be against TOS giving my opinion.
Im scraping the barrel just by not ignoring them again.
On second thoughts, thats just what I neeed, so do you!


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/18/2011 5:15:42 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Sounds like a good idea....and timely too,I fly too New York Wednesday Morning for a quick two week stay....little time for sock puppets.....or sanity's.
Let the ignoring begin.....(I feel better already...lol)


_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/18/2011 5:20:12 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Have fun:) 

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/18/2011 5:20:13 PM   
Sanity


Posts: 22039
Joined: 6/14/2006
From: Nampa, Idaho USA
Status: offline

It would be nice if your and Lucys petty, small minded derails really were behind us mike, I hope this is a promise you two intend to keep


_____________________________

Inside Every Liberal Is A Totalitarian Screaming To Get Out

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/18/2011 5:21:50 PM   
Hillwilliam


Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

dawg, I have not conflated anything.

Oil is where gasoline comes from.  You will note that gasoline is a synergistic multiple of crude since about what?  20% or so can be cracked into gasoline, which begs the question why a gallon of diesel costs more than a gallon of gasoline.

You impute and impugn me with things I never said.

In any case, as I thought you havent any proof that we use all canadian and north dakotan oil internally, nor have you proved that most of the offshore we lease is used internally.

You ain't changed nothin but the name.

Diesel costs more than gasoline because there is more energy that can be released from the chemical bonds in a gallon of diesel compared to gasoline.

Ethanol is similarly cheaper for the same reason. Less energy (mileage) per gallon.

_____________________________

Kinkier than a cheap garden hose.

Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio.

Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/18/2011 6:05:59 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

You want to talk about riots and what affects people, research Watts.

And people just wont get that pissed these days.


Lady tazzy, I disagree with you on this point.

You might be surprised what "people" end up doing, it is still very early yet, and things are going to get much, much worse.

When things get worse, we can discuss what "people" will do, when many, many people's backs are up against the wall.


It's amazing to me how many people still don't comprehend that things are never going to be the same as they were as recently as a few years ago. How can people not get that? The reason people aren't getting that angry yet is that they're still clinging to the illusion that the American Dream is within their reach, and the reach of their children. What you're seeing in Wisconsin and a few other places is the first rumblings of an awakening, a growing awareness on the part of the American people that the American Dream  is effectively over - that the ladder is being pulled up, and they and their families are being left behind.

Wait. Give it a year or two. 20 years from now, those of us who are still alive will be looking back on these past couple of years as the last good years of their lifetimes.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to Marini)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/19/2011 10:36:28 AM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
I love Lucy's posts- her avatars always have the cutest tushies...

Neither plan is workable- but Krugman's comments on Ryan's plan I think are accurate.

From my perspective we've got two choices-

1) Not make any hard choices and finger point as Ryan and Obama are doing. This will wind up with perhaps not nuclear armageddon, but a likely default on the US debt, inflation, and probably reissuing a currency. This has been the path since Ronnie Rayguns, in a fit of pique that he couldn't get rid of social security- did an abrupt about face and decided to raise the amount of taxes going to these programs from 12% to 15% in an effort to "bankrupt the beast". This has now been 30 years in coming, but was foreseeable from the time these new taxes passed. This has been a disaster since small businesses are being wiped out by these taxes- its probably one of the main reasons why new business successes have been declining. The second problem is health care costs which neither Obama nor Ryan addresses. These are the elephants in the living room..

2) We actually do make some substantive changes in the budget, taxes, and health care because we're forced to and enough politicians are scared off by option 1. This however, would require intelligence on the part of a bunch of the members of Congress and while I have certainly met some smart people in Congress, it seems that the dumb ones get more traction and shout them down.

Military costs are a current problem- but the military has seen its budget rise and fall over the years -but health care costs have only continued to rise.

Sam

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/19/2011 1:10:55 PM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct
Neither plan is workable- but Krugman's comments on Ryan's plan I think are accurate.

From my perspective we've got two choices-

1) Not make any hard choices and finger point as Ryan and Obama are doing. This will wind up with perhaps not nuclear armageddon, but a likely default on the US debt, inflation, and probably reissuing a currency. This has been the path since Ronnie Rayguns, in a fit of pique that he couldn't get rid of social security- did an abrupt about face and decided to raise the amount of taxes going to these programs from 12% to 15% in an effort to "bankrupt the beast". This has now been 30 years in coming, but was foreseeable from the time these new taxes passed. This has been a disaster since small businesses are being wiped out by these taxes- its probably one of the main reasons why new business successes have been declining. The second problem is health care costs which neither Obama nor Ryan addresses. These are the elephants in the living room..

2) We actually do make some substantive changes in the budget, taxes, and health care because we're forced to and enough politicians are scared off by option 1. This however, would require intelligence on the part of a bunch of the members of Congress and while I have certainly met some smart people in Congress, it seems that the dumb ones get more traction and shout them down.

Military costs are a current problem- but the military has seen its budget rise and fall over the years -but health care costs have only continued to rise.


If neither plan is workable, why dont you give us your plan, with complete information on every single line item and additional information on every concept. Its easy to dismiss a plan without reading it. Its easy to simply say "it sucks" because you dont like the person presenting the plan (or their political party). These are both tactics the GOP has used in the last three years.

Both plans do use your option 2 above. I've read both plans, and once again, the President has the right idea on the direction and speed. I could explain it, but most folks here have not read either document in its entirity. Would you take someone seriously if they give a negative view of 'War and Peace' after you find they never bothered to read the book? Why should this be any different?


(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/19/2011 2:19:47 PM   
samboct


Posts: 1817
Joined: 1/17/2007
Status: offline
Well, if you're looking for comments- it might help to post some links to make sure we're actually discussing the same economic plan since there have been quite a few as of late.

And in response to your question- how about a different analogy? If someone claims to have designed a perpetual motion machine- I don't need to look at the detailed specifications to know it won't work. Is either plan calling for a major revamp of medicine in this country?

Here's what lowering health care costs is going to take- And AFAIK- Obama's plan merely calls for reducing the growth in health care costs, but to be economically competitive, the US needs health care costs that are comparable to other countries.

1) Remove malpractice. Doctors are either practicing good medicine or they lose their license. Good medicine is evaluated by a board of people with no connection to the doc which can include other MDs but also scientists and engineers, i.e. potential professors of MDs. Bad medicine is operating drunk or incapacitated.
2) Bad outcomes are compensated by a pool- same as vaccines. No more lottery ticket lawsuits.
3) FDA has to mandate use of diagnostics before prescribing any drug costing over $10,000/course. We can't just guess and throw expensive treatments to terminal people on the offbeat chance they might recover. We also need better cancer diagnostics which will require a federal effort- pharma won't do it. But we can't afford to spend $100,000/head in the last six months of life- that's just extended dying. A big chunk of this is a legal problem- docs get sued if they "let" their patients die with dignity.
4) We need a single payer- i.e. National Health Care option. Insurance companies have been in the game of denying care and most of the difference in the costs of healthcare between the US and other countries can be laid at the door of insurance companies. Since I never saw a claims adjuster actually cure an illness- why are we shelling out all this money? Also- an ever increasing chunk of doctors gross income is going to a burgeoning office staff to deal with insurance company BS. Note that Microsoft estimated that 40% of health care costs don't involve health care.

It's possible that if we lower health care costs enough, there may be sufficient revenue to maintain programs like Medicaid. It's going to take some sophisticated modeling to figure that one out. But if we're going to avoid economic disaster- health care costs must come down.


Sam

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals - 4/19/2011 2:22:30 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

It's possible that if we lower health care costs enough, there may be sufficient revenue to maintain programs like Medicaid.


Having it based on 50 different formulas doesnt help.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to samboct)
Profile   Post #: 91
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Krugman on the Obama/Ryan proposals Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.070