CERCKL
Posts: 1039
Joined: 3/4/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
Hmm not sure what you mean by "most." Concepts of "self" are pretty widely varied (and a few off the wall) in philosophy. "most"...as in majority; okay, I am referring essentially to Western European and American philosophy here; and I do recognize that the definition of self itself ends up quite varied, but again I would hold that most within this parameter accept that the self is the intial cause of consciousness with in...this concept of seperation can be traced to Middle Eastern tribes coming up with the concept of self being seperate from God up through the Existentialists holding that the individual is responsible for itself (yes, that was as far as my academic studies went before I left college...I am certain that the tradition continued past the late 1940s). This dichotomy was most blatantly demonstrated by Descartes, which was actually more of an attempt to be an ontological discourse than just an attempt to define the self...as far as BDSM, some of the writings of Nietzsche can be entertaining...and you will have to excuse my rustiness; a topic I haven't really spent much focus on since leaving school almost twenty years ago. quote:
What's your definition of "pattern of consciousness"? How do we construct this? When? If we have not created a pattern, does that mean there is no "self"? For example an infant? What are the parameteres of being consciousness and material? Patterns...I would hold are just that patterns, i.e. repeated, identifiable, definitions...Does an infant have a sense of self? Ask one...I'ld be curious to know. I would hold that potentially not; the development of the areas of the brain which analyzes has not developed...and the infant is a pattern of behaviors; is there consciousness, yes, just like in any life but there are varying degrees of consciousness and not all consciousness is 'self-aware'. How do we construct this??? Well, if I knew that then I would be Cooler than Jesus...I hold that this is done as a function of the brain; the mind is obviously not consciousness but I suggest that perhaps it is a conduit for it...one cannot slice the brain and find the self but one can identify the different neurological paths which tend to be activated with thought. Is the neurological reactions thought or just traces of the paths which thoughts take within the material? The parameters of material and consciousness? Again back to the neurological...also, I would propose that the concept of ourselves, within our body is just one way of experiencing or defining this at this time; our mind cannot tell the difference between 'conscious' thought and dream thought and so the definition again gets caught with in the question. quote:
By what definition? Your definition doesn't define much... How are all of those things part of who you are? How are those external things somehow part of your internal consciousness? A definition wasn't actually given...which would be why my definition didn't define much. Though I suppose we could return to the definition as back to ourself recreating ourselves through the continual act of defining ourselves. What do I mean by that? Return to perception again; I experience a relationship breaking up, how do I react to this? The definition changes; first I am broken-hearted, bitter, angry, sad, defining myself through emotions felt; emotions being neurochemical reactions within this body which are then assessed and defined while I am experiencing them; my memory of the relationship is defined, judged and redefined...she was the best thing that ever happened to me; what's wrong with me why did she leave; she a rotten bitch from hell and I hope she dies a painful, extended death which stays with her through the afterlife, etc, etc...same experience, different judgements...until I meet another and again my memories are reconstructed again... As for how the external is a reflection of myself, I thought that was pretty self-evident; how I choose my surroundings, the people around me, my interactions, manner of dress, etc, all of these are external manifestations to how I choose to define myself. Who I believe I am. My focus is as big of a part of me as my desire to drink strong Turkish coffee or participate in intellectual masturbation. quote:
My questions here do not reflect any of my personal ideals or definitions. They are merely from a severely philosophical scrutinizing perspective. There are twelve step programs for this now...first, you have to be willing to admit that you do have a problem :-) C
_____________________________
AND I AM TOO AN ASSHOLE, I HAVE REFERENCES!!! "Please, please, please believe me, I really am an asshole. All that Enlightenment and Higher Learning shit was all a ruse."
|