WyldHrt
Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008 Status: offline
|
http://www.thedailynorwalk.com/news/mother-defends-enrolling-son-norwalk-school http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/policereports/article/Bridgeport-woman-arrested-for-registering-son-in-1340009.php Further reading. It seems pretty clear that the powers that be are trying to make an example of this woman, and I think they made a horrid choice. If there are enough parents doing this in Norwalk disctrict to supposedly justify hiring private investigators (gee, I wonder how much that costs ), why the hell would the first person who has ever been arrested and prosecuted for this be a homeless woman? Her situation means there is little to no chance of gaining restitution, so why choose her? The whole thing smacks of 'easy target' and just leaves a bad taste in my mouth. The circumstances also suck. Had this woman known that all she had to do was register at the shelter and her son could go to Norwalk, why wouldn't she do it? My guess is that this is the first time she had registered a child for school and she somehow missed the part of the paperwork that reads 'If you are homeless, please use the address of the shelter where you are staying'... or gee, maybe that information is not included in the registration forms. I wouldn't exactly blame her if she was afraid that putting the address of a homeless shelter on school registration forms would bring CPS a calling to remove her son from her custody. Perhaps that is why she never registered at the shelter; I don't know. Should she have asked? Definitely. But I can understand why she may not have. That said, wouldn't the Norwalk district have been 'out' the same amount of money if she had registered at the shelter and legally sent her son to Brookside? Unless the district gets extra money for homeless students, the answer is 'yes' and this boils down to a paperwork error. While ignorance of the law is not an excuse for breaking it, I see this as one hell of a mitigating factor. Also, she received a message telling her that her son needed to leave the school and immediately pulled him out after only 4 months at Norwalk, yet they are going after her for $15,000+ - the cost of an entire year for a Norwalk student? WTF? I think the politicos in Norwalk had better fasten their seat belts, because the backlash on this has already started and I suspect that the whole thing is going to blow up in their faces. ETA- If Norwalk can claim 'theft of services' for educating a child who lives outside their district, I think that I should be able to claim 'theft of funds' when my tax money is used to educate other people's children. I don't have kids, so why do I pay for schools? It might be worth a letter to Jerry Brown, if only to make the sycophant who reads it twitch
< Message edited by WyldHrt -- 4/26/2011 10:02:14 PM >
_____________________________
"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel "We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore" Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!
|