Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 9:32:40 AM   
Rochsub2009


Posts: 2536
Status: offline
I'm late to this party, but I want to make a couple of points.

Firstly, I should preface by saying that I am a male sub.  And I feel no shame in that.

Despite my submissive role in my personal (and private) relationships, I am ALWAYS dominant in my vanilla life.  I'm a former general manager of a $1.5 billion division of a Fortune 25 corporation.  I now own my own company.  I have an engineering degree from a top university, and an MBA from a top 10 B-school.  I played college basketball, and was drafted to play professional baseball when I came out of high school.  Suffice it to say that when I'm at the local BDSM club, I'm ALWAYS the dominant male in the room.  And all of the "Doms" know it.  I could easily take on any 3 of them simultaneously in a physical confrontation.  I'm not bragging.  It's just a fact. 

Being an alpha male and choosing to serve a woman are not mutually exclusive concepts.  In fact, I fail to find any logical link at all.  The Gorean bs that someone posted is almost laughable.  Who is to define what is "natural"?

Frankly, to me, serving a woman is the greatest form of chivalry.  I protect my woman.  I provide for her.  I pamper her.  I cherish her.  I place her needs ahead of my own.  I dedicate myself totally and completely to her.  What's wrong with that?  Moreover, what's "unnatural" about it?




(in reply to NiceGuyNihilist)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 10:38:38 AM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
I haven't read the first eleven pages thank god, but this post rocked. So I will say: I have more respect for a dominant man who is submissive in private, than for a milquetoast who beats ass in the bedroom, or on Second Life.

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 222
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 11:34:55 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Proper top quality post.

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 223
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 2:59:40 PM   
HannahLynHeather


Posts: 2950
Joined: 4/4/2011
From: where it's at
Status: offline
quote:

Frankly, to me, serving a woman is the greatest form of chivalry. I protect my woman. I provide for her. I pamper her. I cherish her. I place her needs ahead of my own. I dedicate myself totally and completely to her. What's wrong with that? Moreover, what's "unnatural" about it?
is totally reconsidering her opinion of male subs. you ROCK rochsub (but that's not a surprise given your name eh?)

hannah lynn


_____________________________

clique? i don't need no stinking clique!

fuck a duck ~w. disney

My Twitter: http://twitter.com/HannahFuck

i hope you enjoyed the post, and as always my friends....have a nice day

(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 224
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 3:01:29 PM   
gothikbutterfly


Posts: 484
Joined: 12/4/2010
From: the deepest darkest recesses of your mind
Status: offline
The only way I would ever show contempt for a person, is based on their actions not their title in the BDSM world.

_____________________________

You're the brains of this operation, I just do what I'm told!

(in reply to HannahLynHeather)
Profile   Post #: 225
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 4:09:47 PM   
sunshinemiss


Posts: 17673
Joined: 11/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

I think that's what really bothers me.  Why settle for crumbs when you're capable of so much more - when your genetic legacy gives you the potential for so much force, drive, will to do.  To see that potential squandered by grovelling at the feet of a man who understands nothing of what it means to be a woman tells me they've simply given up.  And nobody likes a quitter.

People justify this by saying  "Hey, if they're happy, then who cares?"  - Fuck that.  It's not whether they're happy today, but whether they're capable of generating their own happiness on an ongoing basis.  And I see little to indicate they can do this.  It all seems to hinge on the whims of the men they encounter.  That's no way to live.



Interesting...

I moved just a few letters, and amazingly, I totally got this. LOL ... I often think something like this with the "does he love me, why doesn't he pay attention to me" nonsense we see so often from some of the female submissives.

For the people who are submissive - male / female - I do take issue with the helpless "save me " crap. I also take issue with the "it's all about me" nonsense. This is why for *me*, I divide people into little files in my head.

There are the "drama llama / neurotic / gimme what I want and I don't care what you want" folks who are just another flavor of narcissist.

And then there are the people who are in TPE with their lives. Adding another person to get their kink on, to complement their personality, to share an experience or life with is about bringing complete people to the table, being able to share the energy in a reciprocal way. Rochsub so eloquently described this. Thank you for sharing your POV.

It is irrelevant what side of things someone is drawn to. It is irrelevant how deeply they are interested in wiitwd. Where I find the line between comfort and dislike is for me how well they can interact with others and how comfortable they are in their own skin. Perhaps, to put it simply desperation and the bitterness that often ensues from that desperation is the line between comfort and dislike for me.

best,
sunshine

< Message edited by sunshinemiss -- 5/4/2011 4:11:35 PM >


_____________________________

Yes, I am a wonton hussy... and still sweet as 3.14

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 226
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 5:02:15 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ArizonaBossMan

to the question: YES.


Heh. I'd love to meet you, ABM. I'd be fascinated to see whether you could beat me in any competition, of any kind. I really would.


_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to ArizonaBossMan)
Profile   Post #: 227
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 5:19:34 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rochsub2009

Moreover, what's "unnatural" about it?





I really think we can ditch the 'natural/unnatural' debate, Roch. You'e wearing a shirt and tie. You evidently shave. That's unnatural. You don't see Mexcian fruit bats doing that do you? Do you? I rest my case.

The gormless bollocks-for-brains who invoke 'naturalness' in support of their sexual and romantic inclinations haven't got a leg to stand on. Jeez. You know, I seriously think I'd get respect from a certain few Doms if only I were to get really fat, grow a massive moustache and habitually wear wrap-around sunglasses. They'd tell me that I was now being 'natural'. You see gorillas and baboons doing exactly the same things in the wild, of course. Yup, every natural history doc, without fail.



_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 228
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 5:24:47 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Of course.  Which is why it's difficult not to see sub males as victims of some kind of pathology in their environment.  If there's a genetic issue which drops their testosterone count, then of course they're simply not going to be as masculine and aggressive as their counterparts.  But if you're rockin' the full set of testes, any environment which doesn't allow the full development of your masculinity is inhibiting your capability.

I think that's what really bothers me.  Why settle for crumbs when you're capable of so much more - when your genetic legacy gives you the potential for so much force, drive, will to do.  To see that potential squandered by grovelling at the feet of a woman who understands nothing of what it means to be a man tells me they've simply given up.  And nobody likes a quitter.

People justify this by saying  "Hey, if they're happy, then who cares?"  - Fuck that.  It's not whether they're happy today, but whether they're capable of generating their own happiness on an ongoing basis.  And I see little to indicate they can do this.  It all seems to hinge on the whims of the women they encounter.  That's no way to live.



Said by a man who hasnt a clue. Admitting I am a submissive male, and dealing with all the crap comments I get to hear from egotistical pricks who think they are tougher, or more manly, is boring. You are the one with a problem for not realising that not all men have to be the same. It doesnt make us less macho, it doesnt make you more macho, all it does is make you look as though you are posting about your own insecurities. Awareness ?..........Oh the irony.  

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 229
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 5:44:00 PM   
Rochsub2009


Posts: 2536
Status: offline
Edit:  I realized that I'd probably get a private note from the mods for this comment.  So I voluntarily removed it.

But those who got to read it before I removed it probably know that it was true. 


< Message edited by Rochsub2009 -- 5/4/2011 6:12:06 PM >

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 230
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 5:52:41 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
Sure, I'm with you here - the generalised "Natural Law" argument is a load of horse shit, and sure - evolutionary psychology has to have some of the answers, but surely you'd acknowledge that Nurture plays a role along side "Nature"?
  Of course.  Which is why it's difficult not to see sub males as victims of some kind of pathology in their environment.  If there's a genetic issue which drops their testosterone count, then of course they're simply not going to be as masculine and aggressive as their counterparts.  But if you're rockin' the full set of testes, any environment which doesn't allow the full development of your masculinity is inhibiting your capability.

I think that's what really bothers me.  Why settle for crumbs when you're capable of so much more - when your genetic legacy gives you the potential for so much force, drive, will to do.  To see that potential squandered by grovelling at the feet of a woman who understands nothing of what it means to be a man tells me they've simply given up.  And nobody likes a quitter.

People justify this by saying  "Hey, if they're happy, then who cares?"  - Fuck that.  It's not whether they're happy today, but whether they're capable of generating their own happiness on an ongoing basis.  And I see little to indicate they can do this.  It all seems to hinge on the whims of the women they encounter.  That's no way to live.




Awareness,

I honestly cannot see how any of that makes any difference to the matter of whether a man wants to get a woman to serve him, or to whether he wants to get a woman so that she can serve him. Why should it? I've been single for a frigging long time, and I'll remain that way if I don't find the right one. But . . . so I want to beat back dragons and all manner of demons in order to save some woman and then adore her forever after, as a being to admire and cherish and look up to. And stuff. (Fill in your own poetry. I don't do poetry.) In what conceivable way does that make me anyone's idea of un-masculine?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 231
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 6:27:05 PM   
RedMagic1


Posts: 6470
Joined: 5/10/2007
Status: offline
Yes. It was true.

That said, I don't consider you, or, eg, Peon, to be a submissive male. (Nor Awareness nor Arizona to be particularly dominant.) You inspire others to follow your lead, you produce loyalty and sexual attraction in women who will go out of their way to have a chance with you. I imagine you were licking your sugar baby's ass instead of caning it, but I doubt at any time she wielded more real world power than you did. What people prefer at home is inconsequential compared to what they do in life as a whole. Any man who doesn't believe that has my blessing to walk down Castro Street shouting, "All gays are pansies."

_____________________________

Not with envy, not with a twisted heart, shall you feel superior, or go about boasting. Rather in goodness by action make true your song and your word. Thus you shall be highly regarded, and able to live in peace with all others.
- 15th century Aztec

(in reply to Rochsub2009)
Profile   Post #: 232
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/4/2011 10:53:24 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
  Oh for fuck's sake.  I'm not sure which is worse.  The improbable scenario you present or your utter failure to get the point.

The idea that a Domme who engages in reputation dynamics from day one is suddenly overwhelmed by the unreality of what she hears about herself is an idea so ludicrous it's laughable.  But let's say I give you the benefit of the doubt on that.  It's irrelevant.  It's a simple example of the kind of self-promoting nonsense that Dommes on this board constantly engage in.  It's everywhere.  In their sigs and in their constant self-testimony of how wonderful they are and how wonderful their life is.

It really is a case of "methinks the lady doth protest overmuch".  And to be sure, the same problem exists with some of the self-identified male dominants here, but it seems nowhere near as prevalent.  And frankly, the tendency for people here to ego-stroke on one hand and lap up said ego-stroking on the other really does call into question the idea that they're complete individuals who can function without sycophancy in their life.

The purpose of the paragraph was to illustrate how Doms disdain - and are ostracised for - the kind of behaviours which are de rigeur for Dommes.  That essentially part of the dichotomy of my thinking on male vs female subs is tied into the behaviour and standards of the type of individuals to which they submit.

Now, I probably should have known better.  Some of the more pedestrian thinkers in the thread took this as a personal attack and instantly fell about frothing at the mouth.  Do you seriously think if I wanted to attack you personally, I'd make an oblique reference?  And do you seriously think I'd figure an alleged dominant would be bothered by the opinions of a single individual they neither know nor respect?  Give me a fucking break.  I expect idiocy from a lot of people on this board, but I don't expect it from you.

What basically this thread tells me is that there's a lot of incomplete people around here who demand that everyone thinks as they do.  While I understand cliques, I find active participation in them to be the kind of weak and insipid behaviour I tend to despise.  If anyone here seriously thinks I'm moved one whit by the opprobrium of a clique-driven lynch mob, then they really do need to get out more.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 233
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/5/2011 2:22:23 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

What basically this thread tells me is that there's a lot of incomplete people around here who demand that everyone thinks as they do. 


An interesting remark which you dont seem to hold yourself to. Everyone  who disagrees with you is incomplete ?  oh please.

One doesn`t have to be weak to submit to a woman, Roch has said much the same and he is correct. Alpha males can indeed be submissive when with a woman. Your thinking is like the notion that gay men cant fight, or undertake a dangerous job. It is just hot air and nonsense. Sexuallity isnt the same as being able to protect and provide for someone. I will protect my woman as much as the next man.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 234
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/5/2011 2:59:14 AM   
ranja


Posts: 2111
Joined: 11/1/2007
Status: offline
the problem seems to be that not all submissives are perceived by others to be submissive... they might be perceived to be dominants instead
same for dominants... some dominants call themselves dominants but really they are not perceived that way...
so if we don't even know who is who... or worse think people are other than they like to refer to themselves as...
then how we can hold the right person in contempt?
because the sub being held in contempt might actually think of themselves as a dom... or the sub is not being held in contempt because the person who holds subs in contempt thinks of him as a dominant
i am puzzled again

< Message edited by ranja -- 5/5/2011 3:00:37 AM >

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 235
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/5/2011 4:21:03 AM   
LordOdhinn


Posts: 37
Joined: 11/15/2006
Status: offline
No more than I would hold submissive females in contempt.  I'd rather see someone be true to their own nature than pretend to be someone they are not.  Since my fem sub possess her own boy (who I quite like as a person even if I have no interest in Dom'ming males), I say go for what floats you boat and respect others for being who they are.

Just me.


_____________________________

Chatte Wrangler Extraordinaire

50% Humbler than the Other Leading Brands!

Bearer of the "Heather Seal of Trustiness"

(in reply to ranja)
Profile   Post #: 236
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/5/2011 4:33:57 AM   
Charnegui


Posts: 1352
Joined: 5/1/2011
From: Puzzled
Status: offline
Ive got something of that going on here.
People do not believe, or question my submissiveness.

Who is one, behind an other computer screen, questioning about my feelings?
Do you know me then?

It's to easy to type that you have respect, you've got to show some!


< Message edited by Charnegui -- 5/5/2011 4:34:45 AM >


_____________________________

There's a difference between my personality and my attitude; My personality is who I ám, my attitude depends on who you are.

(in reply to LordOdhinn)
Profile   Post #: 237
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/5/2011 6:56:41 AM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
I've been busy with real life stuff and don't want to clutter up the board with a whole bunch of copying of all the great posts made recently but I've got to say that the people that identify as submissive, especially Roch, Peon and Sunny, have made some faaaabulous posts. You all have made me smile and think to myself "YES!, these are people I would love to meet personally!

Forget for a moment how people identify within their personal relationships, who they prefer has the power.......and look at the QUALITY of human being. That, to me, says it all.

A person, of either gender, that considers themselves dominant.......but feels they must demean all that do not agree with them.......only shows great character weakness. They may have a very dominant personality but that does not mean they are a strong and honourable man or woman. It shows great weakness as a human being. Is is dishonourable behaviour. An insecure, weak, dominant person is not asomeone I would want in my life, in any way. To me, they are untrustworthy. They are the type of person I would expect to betray me, especially under pressure. And then, of course, deflect all personal responsibility. Lord help the people in their lives.

< Message edited by LaTigresse -- 5/5/2011 6:57:17 AM >


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to Charnegui)
Profile   Post #: 238
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/5/2011 8:12:25 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
But let's say I give you the benefit of the doubt on that.  It's irrelevant.

Trimming here in an attempt to get to the point.

Seriously, I'd be happier if you didn't take My word for it.  Confirm it by your own methods.  I can promise you that what I've told you on the subject isn't unique.  Ask some of the female Dominants that you know if you can't take My word on the matter.

quote:

It really is a case of "methinks the lady doth protest overmuch".  And to be sure, the same problem exists with some of the self-identified male dominants here, but it seems nowhere near as prevalent. 

Which, oddly enough, was the sum of one comment on this thread before My name suddenly was being dragged into the thing, or at the very least, My prior sig line.  Kind of a chicken shit move, but if you want to try to call it chicken salad, be My guest.

quote:

The purpose of the paragraph was to illustrate how Doms disdain - and are ostracised for - the kind of behaviours which are de rigeur for Dommes.  That essentially part of the dichotomy of my thinking on male vs female subs is tied into the behaviour and standards of the type of individuals to which they submit.

I didn't think that had jack to do with it considering that's not even what the question of the original was.  The OP doesn't ask about Dominant woman at all.  It asks about a prejudice regarding male submissives as a category of people.  Had the same original been written with race or religion specified, rather than an orientation, there would have been no doubt that it was an obvious attempt to get folks to answer in the affirmative because they are basing it on a stereotype.

quote:

Now, I probably should have known better. 

Yeah, you probably should have, but I'm not going to hold it against you.  I'm actually going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you didn't know that I wouldn't have the opportunity to address your remarks directly there for a bit.  (Not the case for everyone, but we'll leave that.)  Ironic that the male submissives on this thread tangled with you in My absence. 

quote:

What basically this thread tells me is that there's a lot of incomplete people around here who demand that everyone thinks as they do. 

You do draw some funny conclusions.  Care to hear some of Mine?

It's somewhat amusing that My name got drug into this thread, not based on the comment that I made on it, but for completely different reasons.  In fact, I didn't see anybody debate My theory on the reason some male Dominants might have contempt for male submissives at all.  The personal attack bullshit was just....... well, bullshit.  Backhanded, cowardly bullshit in some cases, but the Mods already took care of that, by My understanding. 

Anyway, back to the point.  I'll share something with you that most female Dominants know that a number of male Dominants don't get much first hand experience with.  There are far more chest thumping male Dominants out there who secretly have a desire to submit than I think many people realize.  There are various reasons for that.  One of the major ones is that they just aren't strong enough to do it.  They're too worried about image and ego so they take the easier path.  They can't handle being who they really are and would rather be what people expect them to be.  I've watched people whose self loathing ate them up over it.  Are they happy now that they changed roles?  It depends on your definition of it.  Happy in what they settled for as a Dominant, but not happy if you think of what they could have had.

In My personal opinion, the numbers game plays into this in the category, too.  It's just not that easy to cut it as a male submissive looking for a Dominant woman.  It's certainly not a 1:1 ratio by any means.  There have always been fewer women on either side of the kneel, but the numbers do get a little better for male Dominants looking for a female submissive than those of a male submissive looking for a female Dominant.  In short, they gave up and that drives the bitterness that they have for male submissives who have been able to obtain what they were not able to achieve. 

It's important to remember that the male submissives on this thread don't have the status quo experience of the average male submissive.  Unlike the participants here, most males submissives don't have a number of Dominant women lined up to throw their hat in the ring.  The guys on this thread are by far the exception and not the rule.  The average male submissive isn't always going to win the numbers game.  When they don't, where do you think they go?  They either give up and go vanilla or they go to the other side of the kneel.

By the way, if you actually want to discuss how the numbers game effects the advantages of Dominant women that Dominant males don't have, I'll happily participate in the discussion.  You might even find us on the same side because I've been saying that for years. 


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 239
RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? - 5/5/2011 8:14:58 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline
Peon,

May I volunteer to run the book?

_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 240
Page:   <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master >> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188