RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


LaTigresse -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/18/2011 1:52:39 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Hmmm.  Still have a few things to learn about yourself by the looks of it.



Considering that I firmly believe that the day I stop learning and growing, is the day, or night, I die...........of course I do.




depravedslave -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/21/2011 6:42:23 AM)

I'm a guy who is into other guys exclusively, so I won't pretend to know women. I've just had several lesbian and bisexual female friends who are into B.D.S.M., and they've told me that the experience I have had is somewhat similar to their own.

Between two guys, there is often this rivalry that creates a dynamic where the submissive feels that if he can't "beat" the dominant, the submissive should join the dominant by serving him. There is a sort of envy that gets expressed as abject worship. I imagine that male-female relationships don't work the same way at all. But, again, this is all just anecdotal observation. I'm sure everyone is different.

I just think the different contexts are interesting. Everyone has a unique take that is usually influenced in some way by gender.




aromanholiday -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/21/2011 6:19:49 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: depravedslave

Between two guys, there is often this rivalry that creates a dynamic where the submissive feels that if he can't "beat" the dominant, the submissive should join the dominant by serving him. There is a sort of envy that gets expressed as abject worship. I imagine that male-female relationships don't work the same way at all. But, again, this is all just anecdotal observation. I'm sure everyone is different.

I just think the different contexts are interesting. Everyone has a unique take that is usually influenced in some way by gender.


I agree. And thanks for posting that information about guy/guy D&S relationships. I had no idea that happened, but it makes a lot of sense to me. It's never happened to me in a M/f D&S relationship.




LordShadow -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/21/2011 9:40:13 PM)

Not sure that contempt is the right word for it...but there is definitely a loss of respect as a man. Females slaves are of use to me, male slaves are not so some of it comes from that. I am of gorean belief so my belief in natural order and Men taking their rightful place as the dominant of the species also plays a role, actually its not fair to blame all of it on Gorean because I believed Men to be the dominant of the species long before I began to study the philosophies. Anyway there's my two cents...





PdxJ -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/24/2011 1:12:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

quote:

ORIGINAL: a1111

I'm not comfortable with it no, I deal with it but it has taken a lot away from me confidence and pride wise definetly


Stick around. There are some really fabulous submissive men here. Peon is one of them.

I am sure that, culturally, many submissive men have it damned tough. It would be excellent for you, if you could get to know some of these guys and understand that there is nothing 'weak' about their preferred relationship style. I think for many men, it actually takes great strength and courage to live their lives in a way that is authentic to who they are, rather than miserably, trying to be some cultural 'norm'.

In many ways being a 'dominant male' is the easy road. Being authentically YOU is, in my eyes, something to be proud of. Fuck what the unenlightened 'them' thinks.



This is an excellent point that I hadn't considered. Female subs and slaves are, by and large, extremely strong at heart. Sure, there are exceptions but there are exceptions to everything. Why wouldn't the male subs be? Just because they are men submitting to a female shouldn't make them weak.


Thank you LaTigresse,
I still don't want to watch it and I may not understand it but that gave me a different perspective to see it from.




ThundersCry -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/24/2011 5:34:44 PM)

contempt?
no...deep respect...if you think its so easy go try it for s period of time...you just might learn something.
besides why would I show ANY contempt to...anyone...childish.




PeonForHer -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/24/2011 6:28:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LordShadow

Not sure that contempt is the right word for it...but there is definitely a loss of respect as a man. Females slaves are of use to me, male slaves are not so some of it comes from that. I am of gorean belief so my belief in natural order and Men taking their rightful place as the dominant of the species also plays a role, actually its not fair to blame all of it on Gorean because I believed Men to be the dominant of the species long before I began to study the philosophies. Anyway there's my two cents...




What a funny thread this is.

I wonder, what would be the reaction if someone asked the question, 'Middle class people, do you feel contempt for working class people?', or 'Europeans, do you feel contempt for Americans?'

Me, I feel contempt for people who feel contempt for others, for whatever reason, and whichever (quasi) intellectual basis they want to give it. But maybe I feel that way because I'm a very highly educated, middle class, Brit.

Seriously, I don't give a damn about anyone's orientation. I just don't relate to people that way. I deem respect-worthy people to be those who are kind, thoughtful, good company, noble in an everyday way, have some wisdom in them . . . .

Pfft. Those who see this will think, 'Yeah, obviously, why bother to say it?' But those who don't see this, will probably never see it. They're not strong enough to get by without having some sort of contempt to keep them going.

This thread is CM's equivalent of a toilet. Everyone: come to this thread and take that much-needed dump.




MarcEsadrian -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/24/2011 10:42:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
What a funny thread this is.

I wonder, what would be the reaction if someone asked the question, 'Middle class people, do you feel contempt for working class people?', or 'Europeans, do you feel contempt for Americans?'


Indeed. Perhaps a socially relevant reversal to this question might be, "feminists, do you have contempt for submissive females?"

Middle class vs. working class, eh? I had to smile at that one. Being that the middle class is synonymous with working grunts of society, I don't see much of a distinction there. In America, at least.





sunshinemiss -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 3:06:42 AM)

quote:

Indeed. Perhaps a socially relevant reversal to this question might be, "feminists, do you have contempt for submissive females?"


Lady Pact started a similar thread ...
http://www.collarchat.com/m_3686272/tm.htm




DesFIP -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 3:15:26 AM)

I see that as a worthless question Marc, since so many submissive females, if not all, are feminists. We want equal pay for equal work, we want equal admission to college based on merit not gender, we want to be considered for promotions based on our abilities not our gender, we want equal focus on our health needs, we want equal funding for girls sports as well as boys, we don't want to have to be subjected to sexual harassment and/or rape in order to keep a job. We want equal protection under the law to rent apartments, buy homes and other such activities.

I really doubt we all are contemptuous of ourselves for wanting these things for us and our daughters.




LaTigresse -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 3:56:05 AM)

But Celeste, I am quite certain that there would be MANY vanilla feminists that would be appalled by the idea of a woman submitting to a man.




DesFIP -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 4:43:38 AM)

Certainly, but vanilla by definition means they don't understand power exchange. However he specifically wrote his question to make it appear that if you are submissive, you think you are worthless, and don't deserve equal protection under the law. It was that which I responded to. I have no conflict being grateful that my daughter's sport is funded as well as my son's despite the fact that I personally do better not being the leader in the relationship. My acceptance of my need for submission comes from being self aware, not from self loathing.




PeonForHer -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 6:27:56 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MarcEsadrian
Indeed. Perhaps a socially relevant reversal to this question might be, "feminists, do you have contempt for submissive females?"


I agree with DesFIP on this. Lady Pact's thread, as cited by sunshinemiss, didn't yield responses in the affirmative. I do think La T could be right that vanilla feminists might frown on femsubs - but that'd be principally because they don't grasp the concept of power exchange. But re femdoms particularly: I'd argue, further, that one needs a pretty clear idea of equality (as a feminist must have, by definition) in order to grasp what it really means to take power from, or give up power to, another person.

quote:

Middle class vs. working class, eh? I had to smile at that one. Being that the middle class is synonymous with working grunts of society, I don't see much of a distinction there. In America, at least.


Ah, there speaks someone who's never been truly immersed in Brit culture and society. [;)] I don't recommend that aspect of Brit life, I have to say. The father of our Prime Minister, David Cameron, has recently been reported as opining that 'working class people prefer to be led by someone of the upper class' (such as his son). The PM is, of course, no doubt embarrassed. You can think such things here, but it doesn't do to say them anymore.

It's an interesting facet of life here: meet a working class racist in a pub here, and after a few pints he'll be glad to tell you all about his dislike of the failings of other races. He'll say that they're 'just not like us' and that he prefers 'to mix with his own type'. You can't imagine the fury that you'll get if your response to that is something like, 'Yep, I agree. Working class people are just not like me and my type, so I don't mix with them.'

Of course you'll be called a snob. But what is a racist, if he's not a snob taken to the nth degree?








xssve -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 6:32:55 AM)

Honestly, it's never bothered me, gay never bothered me either, it's just one guy I don't have to fight, it's a good thing!

It bothers me a lot if it's a political thing, i.e., blind obedience to authority in general, which afflicts a lot people one would otherwise characterize as dominant, but on an interpersonal level, whatever works for you man.

But then, I've always sort of gone it alone, I'm not the kind of guy who likes to dogpile somebody for being "different", whatever it is, the way a lot of guys will do to women, gays, the mentally handicapped, etc., I think that's fucking weak, I'm more inclined to stick up for the underdog.




MarcEsadrian -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 8:44:29 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP
I see that as a worthless question Marc, since so many submissive females, if not all, are feminists.


I wouldn't say all submissive females are feminists, but that's beside the point that of course it's a worthless question, no more or less worthless than the notion being implied in this very thread's opening question.

I think LaTigresse does point out correctly, however, that there are many "feminists" (perhaps better described as extreme feminists or female supremacists) who would have a problem with women submitting to men, and you'd be fooling yourself to think they are only in the "vanilla world" (whatever that means today). When we flip the orientations and the sexes around, it still seems like an absurd premise and a complete waste of brain energy. This thread's premise is equally pointless.




LadyPact -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 5:01:10 PM)

For what it's worth, I didn't angle the thread on the other forum specifically towards feminists or supremacists at all.  I wanted it to be rather generic, just as this thread has been.  Even if the subject has banter included in it, I don't expect it to go on even a small percentage of what this one has.  We just honestly don't have the same issue on the other side of the gender fence.  Not as a category or a a group as a whole.  As a case by case basis?  Certainly, but that has far more to do with individuality, rather than the conflict that exists here.




heartcream -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 9:13:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MarcEsadrian


Indeed. Perhaps a socially relevant reversal to this question might be, "feminists, do you have contempt for submissive females?"

Middle class vs. working class, eh? I had to smile at that one. Being that the middle class is synonymous with working grunts of society, I don't see much of a distinction there. In America, at least.




You had to smile at that? This sadly sounds like a middle class statement. Since there is sooo much poverty here in Canada and the USA, what kind of grunts do you call them?




MarcEsadrian -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/25/2011 11:42:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact
For what it's worth, I didn't angle the thread on the other forum specifically towards feminists or supremacists at all.  I wanted it to be rather generic, just as this thread has been.  Even if the subject has banter included in it, I don't expect it to go on even a small percentage of what this one has.  We just honestly don't have the same issue on the other side of the gender fence.  Not as a category or a a group as a whole.  As a case by case basis?  Certainly, but that has far more to do with individuality, rather than the conflict that exists here.


I'm not sure what measure of "contempt" for submissiveness in one's own sex to the other lies in either the male or female demographic, though I have heard and seen revulsion expressed by both on more than one occasion over the idea. If I had to choose who carps about it more, I'd have to say it's the manly men.




Awareness -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/26/2011 11:56:03 PM)

  Christ, so much for edifying discussion.  It did indeed peter out into cheap shots and mutual agreement.  That's probably the first lesson for some people - there's more mileage in conflict than in insipidly agreeing with everyone.

quote:

ORIGINAL: sunshinemiss
I don't think it is true that "most people have contempt for racists." In fact, that's an interesting question. It would mean most people have contempt for themselves, for we are all "-ist" to some degree. Even the people who work toward greater understanding, who do their best to eliminate the tiniest kernels of prejudice in themselves are often able to maintain a certain understanding for people who are not able / choose not to eliminate it in themselves. That is not contempt, it is compassion, and it has to do with culture, time, age, and a myriad of other factors.
  This is a complex issue.  The first problem is that there's a difference between racism and cultural warfare.  Racism is xenophobia without limitations - to a certain extent it exists in us all - however it becomes 'racism' when one of us identifiably labels another as a racist.  That is, it crosses a mystical threshold in the observer which leads them to make that value judgment.

quote:

To bring it back to the question at hand, submissive men versus dominant men - the us vs them scenario set up within the OP. What is confusing(?) for me is this. I see the two very much in the same way. You (men, not you specifically) are men. You are socialized in similar ways, your brains and bodies work in similar ways, your goals are similar. Where is room for contempt?
  Indeed, where is the room for contempt in any of us?  Yet it exists in us all with the common, shared notion that there exists sufficient justification in our own minds.

Indeed, there is a particular irony in some people vilifying my honesty, but using my beliefs as justifying their contempt for me.  The abject hypocrisy of this is apparently lost on them.  In a lifestyle in which moral judgments are normally - for the most part - suspended, the reality that underneath it all everyone's just acting in self-interest is probably too much of a reality check for them to process.

There was very little exploration of my reasons - those simply weren't required, because the actual desire wasn't understanding but vilification and to silence the one voice in their midst which didn't join the general chorus of agreement.  The level of group-think is staggering but ironic for people who like to portray themselves as such free thinkers.

quote:

To my mind - and I could be wrong - this is not a place for contempt so much as an understanding that there are different places on the same continuum, and each group generally clusters at one end or the other. Don't both of you want to be in relation with your women in a way that pleases you and your partner?
   The thing here is you're positing your own rationales, not inquiring into mine.  I'm not fussed, there's very few capable of reasoned debate here, but you're unlikely to gain insight into someone's mind by commencing with your own viewpoint.


quote:

[:)]Oh, I've no need for simply mutual admiration societies - mutual respect yes (I may be splitting hairs, but to my mind it is an important distinction). I have great respect for a number of people I WHOLEHEARTEDLY disagree with. I don't want to stop the debate. How ever will I clarify my own viewpoint? How will I learn? How will I teach others if all I do is say, "oh yes, yes yes." It's true, if we all agree, what fun is that? How can we possibly interact in any but the most shallow of ways?
  When people become friends, they often suspend critical judgment.  As an example here, people frequently excuse behaviour from their friends which they publicly denounce in newbies.  When called on this, they pull together the most outlandish justifications.  That's a mutual admiration society.  That's a clique.  If you can't call your friends on their bullshit, then you're a sycophant.  I don't roll that way and I simply do not respect people who do.




HannahLynHeather -> RE: Do you have contempt for submissive males? (5/27/2011 12:20:18 AM)

quote:

gain insight into someone's mind
trust me, you really, really, really don't want to even peek into my mind. every time i do speak my mind on a topic it tends to implode.


hannah lynn




Page: <<   < prev  20 21 [22] 23 24   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875